|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
317
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 08:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
No you attacked him while misreading his statement. Your belligerence hopefully won't blind you from recognizing your folly and apologizing. He essentially said it's not good enough of a killer to warrant the downsides of its known cqc ineptitude. SMH. |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
319
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 15:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:No you attacked him while misreading his statement. Your belligerence hopefully won't blind you from recognizing your folly and apologizing. He essentially said it's not good enough of a killer to warrant the downsides of its known cqc ineptitude. SMH. checked my copy log (program I made that has a picture of every site and page that I ever looked up for this exact reason), and there was no "not", which makes me correct, and he's trying to be slick, and he's not slick.
No you are trying to be slick instead of apologizing. If he'd changed it it would have an edited text in red. No text, you are simply wrong, and now you are trying to cover it up. |
Zatara Rought
TeamPlayers EoN.
325
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 22:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
XV1 wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:No you attacked him while misreading his statement. Your belligerence hopefully won't blind you from recognizing your folly and apologizing. He essentially said it's not good enough of a killer to warrant the downsides of its known cqc ineptitude. SMH. checked my copy log (program I made that has a picture of every site and page that I ever looked up for this exact reason), and there was no "not", which makes me correct, and he's trying to be slick, and he's not slick. No you are trying to be slick instead of apologizing. If he'd changed it it would have an edited text in red. No text, you are simply wrong, and now you are trying to cover it up. I even edited this post so you can see the red overhead. DOUBLE SMH. I didn't know that it put red text in. Thought there was just a small message at the top of post. Either way it's not there, checked when he said he checked his "copy log." I would like to look into this program though as it could be useful, however I do not think I would use it primarily to argue on forums Hm, I see it as red here, but on your post it lacks the red and does not link to the original post. Strange.
Edited cause I was tired to clarify. ^_^ |
|
|
|