DUST Search - Still no new game modes? are you serious?

Mobius Wyvern wrote:

Knight SoIaire wrote:

The devblog today didn't include everything, hopefully we see the return of Skirm 1.0.

I dont get it, how come its taking them so long to implement a gamemode they know works, anyway?

Because it didn't exactly work perfectly, man, which is why it was removed in the first place. It was extremely vulnerable to some pretty lame cheese.

KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:

General Regret wrote:

Help improve the core of the game first like mechanics and so. Plus with only 5k players active more game modes would mean more time waiting - less game time Big smile

Adios!

We only have 2 real modes, OMS should just be included with Ambush, and Domination should be included in Skirmish; the number of objectives does not justify a new mode, its like making 5 point objective its own separate mode.

Our 2 game modes aren't even that great, just TDM which every other shooter has, and some point control mode like every other shooter also has. There is no complex multi-stage game mode like the original Skirmish 1.0; this game fails when it comes to game modes.

Also the playercount argument is bad, players will quit because they're bored of the same 2 modes (and variations), and decrease playercount, and not adding game modes because of playercount decrease will only cause a downward spiral.

So, basically they have to fix every single problem all at the same time for 1.2?

Seems a little unrealistic, man.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
TheMarkOf22 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 219	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:32:00 - [1] - Quote people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game.
Knight SoIaire Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 894	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:34:00 - [2] - Quote The devblog today didn't include everything, hopefully we see the return of Skirm 1.0. I dont get it, how come its taking them so long to implement a gamemode they know works, anyway?
TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 1182	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:34:00 - [3] - Quote CCP: "Here's more stuff!" Community: "Not enough"
xLTShinySidesx Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance 430	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:35:00 - [4] - Quote I'm glad they used 1.2 to fix core skills personally, all the extras can wait. Priorities!
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 4029	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:38:00 - [5] - Quote TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: CCP: "Here's more stuff!" Community: "Not enough" I think people are just curious if CCP knows how to make game types. These game modes are getting might dry. At least we'll have a new area to fight the same fights on, that's exciting.
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2747	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:39:00 - [6] - Quote TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: CCP: "Here's more stuff! you didn't ask for or want" Community: "Really? smh." Only thing I saw that would be them going down the right road was ISK tranafer - which is important but would of seen real use back when people actually CARED about PC. And improvements on armor plates - which we all know will still probably suck. Anyways fixed your comment for you ;)
Taurion Bruni Nightingale Logistics Pty Ltd 73	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:48:00 - [7] - Quote CCP is hard at work to fix the millions of things that others have asked for, they are not super programmers, for a game to work right, you need time.
Poplo Furuya Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 76	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:49:00 - [8] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: CCP: "Here's more stuff!" Community: "Not enough" I think people are just curious if CCP knows how to make game types. Yep, that's the short of it. There's also the fact that the current game modes are not at all conducive to the integration of the infantry game and the vehicular game. They're quite unfocused and lacking in direction. In a gameplay sense they're lacking. In a thematic sense they're barmy, especially for PC.
Django Quik R.I.f.t 754	Posted - 2013.06.25 19:54:00 - [9] - Quote lol 2 years. Closed beta started March 2012. It's June 2013.
Draco Dustflier DUST University Ivy League 140	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:01:00 - [10] - Quote What i'm wondering is how they thought they could pull off something as complicated as what they were promising with dust if they can't even make a game mode.

Poplo Furuya Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 76	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:05:00 - [11] - Quote Draco Dustflier wrote: What i'm wondering is how they thought they could pull off something as complicated as what they were promising with dust if they can't even make a game mode. For the longest time I did actually believe Skirmish in it's current state was a slapdash placeholder mode for testing how the different elements of Dust interacted with each other.
low genius The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance 114	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:35:00 - [12] - Quote TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. have you tried crying about it? i hear that works.
low genius The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance 114	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:37:00 - [13] - Quote TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. you're not the best at counting, are you?
Spkr4theDead Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 204	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:38:00 - [14] - Quote TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. Go back to MAG then.
Cosgar The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 2098	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:40:00 - [15] - Quote I'd rather aiming and game mechanic balancing get fixed
TheMarkOf22 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 220	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:59:00 - [16] - Quote Spkr4theDead wrote: TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. Go back to MAG then. Why would I go back to the same situation?
TheMarkOf22 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 220	Posted - 2013.06.25 20:59:00 - [17] - Quote Cosgar wrote: I'd rather aiming and game mechanic balancing get fixed haven't been fixed yet, and never will be.
Severance Pay Purgatorium of the Damned League of Infamy 483	Posted - 2013.06.25 21:09:00 - [18] - Quote TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. CCP Eterne states that they will respond to user feedback, and start fixing the bugs so that it is playable and new content will come after. They have decided instead of adding new content they will fix all the bugs that were released in uprising. Please go somewhere and die.
ZDub 303 TeamPlayers EoN. 480	Posted - 2013.06.25 21:19:00 - [19] - Quote meh... so many things need to be fixed first before we even bother with new game modes.
General Regret PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY 0	Posted - 2013.06.25 21:53:00 - [20] - Quote Help improve the core of the game first like mechanics and so. Plus with only 5k players active more game modes would mean more time waiting - less game time Adios!

KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 4542	Posted - 2013.06.25 22:25:00 - [21] - Quote General Regret wrote: Help improve the core of the game first like mechanics and so. Plus with only 5k players active more game modes would mean more time waiting - less game time Adios! We only have 2 real modes, OMS should just be included with Ambush, and Domination should be included in Skirmish; the number of objectives does not justify a new mode, its like making 5 point objective its own separate mode. Our 2 game modes aren't even that great, just TDM which every other shooter has, and some point control mode like every other shooter also has. There is no complex multi-stage game mode like the original Skirmish 1.0; this game fails when it comes to game modes. Also the playercount argument is bad, players will quit because they're bored of the same 2 modes (and variations), and decrease playercount, and not adding game modes because of playercount decrease will only cause a downward spiral.
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. CRONOS. 2079	Posted - 2013.06.25 22:59:00 - [22] - Quote Knight SoIaire wrote: The devblog today didn't include everything, hopefully we see the return of Skirm 1.0. I dont get it, how come its taking them so long to implement a gamemode they know works, anyway? Because it didn't exactly work perfectly, man, which is why it was removed in the first place. It was extremely vulnerable to some pretty lame cheese. KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: General Regret wrote: Help improve the core of the game first like mechanics and so. Plus with only 5k players active more game modes would mean more time waiting - less game time Adios! We only have 2 real modes, OMS should just be included with Ambush, and Domination should be included in Skirmish; the number of objectives does not justify a new mode, its like making 5 point objective its own separate mode. Our 2 game modes aren't even that great, just TDM which every other shooter has, and some point control mode like every other shooter also has. There is no complex multi-stage game mode like the original Skirmish 1.0; this game fails when it comes to game modes. Also the playercount argument is bad, players will quit because they're bored of the same 2 modes (and variations), and decrease playercount, and not adding game modes because of playercount decrease will only cause a downward spiral. So, basically they have to fix every single problem all at the same time for 1.2? Seems a little unrealistic, man.
TheMarkOf22 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 223	Posted - 2013.06.26 00:33:00 - [23] - Quote Severance Pay wrote: TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. CCP Eterne states that they will respond to user feedback, and start fixing the bugs so that it is playable and new content will come after. They have decided instead of adding new content they will fix all the bugs that were released in uprising. Please go somewhere and die. What exactly are they fixing this build? and on what attempt are they on? They don't seem to have a problem adding new aurum gear everyday.... Are you really that dumb?
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 422	Posted - 2013.06.26 00:38:00 - [24] - Quote TheMarkOf22 wrote: Severance Pay wrote: TheMarkOf22 wrote: people have been playing this beta for almost 2 years and still only one Objective game mode in the game.. Still no large scale combat, still no new game modes.... Stop making marketplace products and start making a better game. CCP Eterne states that they will respond to user feedback, and start fixing the bugs so that it is playable and new content will come after. They have decided instead of adding new content they will fix all the bugs that were released in uprising. Please go somewhere and die. What exactly are they fixing this build? and on what attempt are they on? Read the blog and find out. Also don't forget tto read the one tomorrow and the one on Thursday.
Alik'ar Morbin Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2013.06.26 01:54:00 - [25] - Quote How hard is it to activate skirmish 1.0? CCP jian said "Skirmish 1.0 is coming back!" At fanfest this year. Wonder how long that will take? Lool Another line we can all wait and hold our breath for. ROFL #dustfailed
bolsh lee Ahrendee Mercenaries Omega Commission 208	Posted - 2013.06.26 02:23:00 - [26] - Quote I would rather have the "core mechanics" fixed like AIMING, hit detection, PC lag etc etc... Flush this ** out with these supposed "rapid fire updates".. Then next major content release, give us an amazing skirmish 3.0 with said repaired, solid foundation, 24v24 with all racial varients while making sure not to "fix ** that isnt broken..." Will CCP do this? Not gonna hold my breath...
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 4549	Posted - 2013.06.26 02:27:00 - [27] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Knight SoIaire wrote: The devblog today didn't include everything, hopefully we see the return of Skirm 1.0. I dont get it, how come its taking them so long to implement a gamemode they know works, anyway? Because it didn't exactly work perfectly, man, which is why it was removed in the first place. It was extremely vulnerable to some pretty lame cheese. KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: General Regret wrote: Help improve the core of the game first like mechanics and so. Plus with only 5k players active more game modes would mean more time waiting - less game time Adios! We only have 2 real modes, OMS should just be included with Ambush, and Domination should be included in Skirmish; the number of objectives does not justify a new mode, its like making 5 point objective its own separate mode. Our 2 game modes aren't even that great, just TDM which every other shooter has, and some point control mode like every other shooter also has. There is no complex multi-stage game mode like the original Skirmish 1.0; this game fails when it comes to game modes. Also the playercount argument is bad, players will quit because they're bored of the same 2 modes (and variations), and decrease playercount, and not adding game modes because of playercount decrease will only cause a downward spiral. So, basically they have to fix every single problem all at the same time for 1.2? Seems a little unrealistic, man. It doesn't have to come at 1.2, but it needs to be a top priority. LogicLoop said that despite him trying to push it, SK 1.0 is still not a big priority for CCP.
geddeylee Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2013.06.27 07:13:00 - [28] - Quote Just flip the switch for skirmish 1.0
freddy49 fix Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2013.06.27 08:07:00 - [29] - Quote geddeylee wrote: Just flip the switch for skirmish 1.0 I agree with the re release of skirmish 1.0. How hard can it be?
Michael Arck sephiroth clones General Tso's Alliance 40	Posted - 2013.06.27 08:37:00 - [30] - Quote Nothing happens overnight. EVE has came a very long way. No doubt Dust will have the same progression. I don't even understand your complaint since every FPS offers the same modes. It's just different executions and different titles.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page