DUST Search - Bout time we fixed that dumbf**k weapon

Sgt Buttscratch wrote:

R'adeh Hunt wrote:

So wait...you are calling your initial post constructive? Lol

You clearly have never used the weapon yourself, haven't compared it to other sidearms, and for crying out loud you whine about losing militia/standard suits to proto weapons. Your entire post is a bitchy little whine post with clueless "suggestion" Roll

Learn to play the game instead of whining and making laughable suggestions like "one shot reload". Also, calling a flaylock a "mid range weapon" is another sign that you're simply beyond clueless.

I understand how other side arms work, I also never see an SMG user go 30/0, all the other side arms are very situalional, but the flalock is not. I have used it, and it was just a mockery of gun fights. there is no skill required
I was crying about loosing militia suits, especially considering, I dont use them. I was pointing the fact of how cheap the weapon is. I had a feeling that would fly over peoples heads.

Post was constructive in the matter of not hiding behind this crutch and explaining that I think thats its a cheap/gimmick weapon that shouldn't be ingame in the state its in.

I have leaned to play the game, and many other games, this is actually one of the first weapons i have ever just flat out thought to myself, what the **** were they thinking.

When i made this post I knew i would take a lot more flak than like, that is because, a lot of players nowadays will protect their kdr to the death, wether it benfits the game or not.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
R'adeh Hunt The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 114	Posted - 2013.06.23 20:11:00 - [1] - Quote 1 shot reload? So essentially, you want users to be dead if they miss a single shot...sounds reasonable. Wow you sound like a complete and utter whiner who sucks at the game How about you learn to not move in dumb predictable patterns? The flaylocks slower flight time means users have to lead shots a lot (which btw takes more skill than using an AR!!), which only works against opponents who are too dumb to not move in predicable patterns (you obviously are part of the dumb player group). Also, even a core flaylock won't kill a heavy in 2-3 shots....unless that heavy takes fire from other sources. Love clueless rage posts like yours, they're funny. Can I have your stuff....or are you willing to get better at the game instead of whining like a little b***? The reason the TAR was nerfed was because it was good at EVERYTHING without any major drawbacks. The flaylock has PLENTY of drawbacks. Range, small clip size, only 3 shots, pretty pointless against shields...do you want more? Don't be ridiculous if you expect people to take you seriously... Also, complaining about losing standard/militia suits to a PROTO weapon is beyond laughable
R'adeh Hunt The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 114	Posted - 2013.06.23 20:23:00 - [2] - Quote dday3six wrote: The biggest issue with the Flaylock is the bonus damage explosive weapons deal to armor. If that were lowered or armor had a skill to increase damage resistance I believe the Flaylock would be more balanced. So I take it you also want to lower SR's damage bonus to shields?
R'adeh Hunt The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 114	Posted - 2013.06.23 20:41:00 - [3] - Quote Sgt Buttscratch wrote: @ R'adeh Hunt i almost thought i was gunna read a well constructed post then, I know some people need these crutch/fotm weapons to make themselves feel awesome, fact of the matter is, its "drawbars" are very very minor, and it performance nullifies tem, excellent at range, damage, splash hitting people behind cover. I also already adressed the "predictable patterns" @ Pegasis clap clap, no tears here, I got real **** to deal with, don't let games actaully get to me, but have at it. @ Kevlar naw thats not my style, don't need crutches or a self given pat on the back. So wait...you are calling your initial post constructive? You clearly have never used the weapon yourself, haven't compared it to other sidearms, and for crying out loud you whine about losing militia/standard suits to proto weapons. Your entire post is a bitchy little whine post with clueless "suggestion" Learn to play the game instead of whining and making laughable suggestions like "one shot reload". Also, calling a flaylock a "mid range weapon" is another sign that you're simply beyond clueless.
R'adeh Hunt The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 114	Posted - 2013.06.23 21:03:00 - [4] - Quote Sgt Buttscratch wrote: R'adeh Hunt wrote: So wait...you are calling your initial post constructive? You clearly have never used the weapon yourself, haven't compared it to other sidearms, and for crying out loud you whine about losing militia/standard suits to proto weapons. Your entire post is a bitchy little whine post with clueless "suggestion" Learn to play the game instead of whining and making laughable suggestions like "one shot reload". Also, calling a flaylock a "mid range weapon" is another sign that you're simply beyond clueless. I understand how other side arms work, I also never see an SMG user go 30/0, all the other side arms are very situalional, but the flalock is not. I have used it, and it was just a mockery of gun fights. there is no skill required I was crying about loosing militia suits, especially considering, I dont use them. I was pointing the fact of how cheap the weapon is. I had a feeling that would fly over peoples heads. Post was constructive in the matter of not hiding behind this crutch and explaining that I think thats its a cheap/gimmick weapon that shouldn't be ingame in the state its in. I have leaned to play the game, and many other games, this is actually one of the first weapons i have ever just flat out thought to myself, what the **** were they thinking. When i made this post I knew i would take a lot more flak than like, that is because, a lot of players nowadays will protect their kdr to the death, wether it benfits the game or not. Oh, so you don't militia/standard suits? I guess you were lying then WHEN YOU SAID JUST THE OPPOSITE IN ONE OF YOUR PREVIOUS POSTS!!! Also, going 30/0 isn't the norm...plenty of SMG users go 30/0 once in a while, just like some flaylock users get the same scores when fighting DUMB players. But it's not the norm. Do you really want to "balance" the game based on the dumbest players? If they can't cope it, in your fantasy world it's overpowered? You're talking out of your ass and are pretty much lying as your latest post proves. Not only that, your "solutions" are so laughable, it's hard to take you seriously.