|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2814
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 16:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:The topic is the question, provide your answer. Are you happy with the way BPOs work, or would you prefer that they operated differently, or maybe even not at all? Are there guidelines CCP should follow for them, or is anything free game? ANything you can think of in regards to BPOs, anything at all.
Personally, I dislike the idea that BPO are AURUM only, and that they are not EVE like. In EVE, a BPO just means that you won't lose the Blueprint, not that you have infinite copies of whatever is on the paper. You still need to pony up the components and labor costs. I'd be fine with DUST BPOs if they allowed you to buy copies of that item anywhere regardless of local market availability once the player market hits, but they would still cost a fair deal of ISK(or minerals if there ends up being some new DUST mineral/mining thingy, whatever happens), possibly the standardized prices we have now.
Also, nothing above Militia level modules if BPOs are kept at current functionality, Standard level stuff like the MAG tribute suits is already pushing it.
I'm sort of happy with the way they currently work. So long as there are not too many BPOs. Also, standard BPOs is kind of pushing it. Let's hope they don't go any further. I generally treat them as fallback items in case I have to tighten my belt whenever my wallet runs dry.
In regards to guidelines, this is New Eden. Anything is considered fair game. Although I'm not sure about sniping from MCCs part. That's something I'm having trouble trying to decide whether to agree or disagree with. Besides that, players should be able to do as they please with whatever is given to them. People do that in Eve Online all the time anyways. Look at ChribbraX with his Veldnaught in Amarr. He's mining... in a dreadnaught... meant for siege warfare... in high sec.
Currently, I don't like seeing the BPOs as AUR only. However, CCP did mention last year that they intend to one day open the secondary market and allow players to sell AUR items to other players for ISK the same way Eve Online players do already with PLEX and vanity items. CCP will still make money because at least one player has to constantly purchase the AUR item with cash to be able to keep the supply in the market sustained. This will also create wild variations in prices in the market as players negotiated or estimate the buying/selling value of the AUR items based on the laws of supply and demand. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2814
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 16:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:it would be cool if at the end of the match you got a little bit of each resource in eve and you needed to use them to build adv+ suits
and you could buy resources with isk or sell them and if you wanted a factional suit it would be a high resource cost like 5,000 tritanum or stuff like that
would be awesome ~ Personally I think we'd need a new set of resources, partially to keep large EVE alliances from owning DUST mercs with fleets of Hulks, and partially because it says in the description of Tritanium that the metal is useless within atmospheres and I'll be damned before I let CCP forget that :3.
Actually, there are already resources in the planets that are only accessible via planets that Eve Online players need for the production and operation of player-owned structures. These are things you normally get via planetary interaction. If Eve Online players and Dust players were to be given a chance to work together via this already-established mechanic that's been around since the Tyrannis Expansion, then we can see Dust players being able to negotiate with Eve players to make sure they don't get shafted.
Either way, Dust players should be the ones to provide the materials in some way while Eve players do the production since Eve players have already established a solid system of wholesale and manufacturing at incredibly efficient rates. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
2822
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 19:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Geth Massredux wrote:Zero Harpuia wrote:The topic is the question, provide your answer. Are you happy with the way BPOs work, or would you prefer that they operated differently, or maybe even not at all? Are there guidelines CCP should follow for them, or is anything free game? ANything you can think of in regards to BPOs, anything at all.
Personally, I dislike the idea that BPO are AURUM only, and that they are not EVE like. In EVE, a BPO just means that you won't lose the Blueprint, not that you have infinite copies of whatever is on the paper. You still need to pony up the components and labor costs. I'd be fine with DUST BPOs if they allowed you to buy copies of that item anywhere regardless of local market availability once the player market hits, but they would still cost a fair deal of ISK(or minerals if there ends up being some new DUST mineral/mining thingy, whatever happens), possibly the standardized prices we have now.
Also, nothing above Militia level modules if BPOs are kept at current functionality, Standard level stuff like the MAG tribute suits is already pushing it. So are you mad that there are BPO's in the game... Where are you going with this? Its a BPO, why complain and ***** about it... get over it - GETH I'm not mad about BPOs, I just think that having an infinite supply of something is a bad concept for the heavy risk-v-reward system EVE relies on to run its markets, and it will negatively impact Standard and Militia production.
Again, once the secondary market opens up, players will be able to purchase the BPOs with ISK from other players while still allowing CCP to profit so long as the variety of BPOs is kept to a minimum. There is a reason why we don't see free tanks or free dropships anymore and a legit reason why we don't see BPOs for advanced and proto gear.
Of course, the vast majority of the profits for CCP will come from the constant consumption of non-BPO gear that are constantly lost in every match. This will probably make up a large part of the secondary market in the future compared to BPOs. |
|
|
|