|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
192
   |
Posted - 2013.06.20 03:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
I really don't care. I want this back.
Remember this? If you do, your gaming history is awesome. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
192
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 03:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Void Echo wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Charlotte O'Dell wrote:Alright, let's assume we'll get MTACs this year. I think it's safe to say they'll require vehicle skills, use small turrets, move slower than tanks, and have less HP than tanks.
How is a vehicle that moves slower than a tank and that has less DPS going to survive against current AV and even tanks? Or maybe you should assume less and just wait. look at what supports this, the new enforcers cost 2x as much as real tanks yet are far weaker, mainly because the assaulters crying "nerf everything" Enforcers are a specializations of the HAVs, not an entirely new vehicle type. MTACs are an entirely new vehicle type.
They're a specialization in death traps, like small sport coupe cars. Crash, and die. With an enforcer, you get hit once, you die. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
192
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 03:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jax Saurian wrote:MTACs don't even exist yet, not even concept art and you're complaining?
1. they are vehicles of COURSE they'll need vehicle skills
2. who's to say they don't get a single large turret or a small turret on both arms (two small turrets can be quite effective)
3. Where'd you get this information from? How do you know they'll move slower?
4. okay yeah they'll probably have less armor/shields
and to Void Echo,
Do you even know what the enforcers are meant for? rail tanking, they're weaker so they can be destroyed while they RAIL TANK in the red line they aren't meant for the front lines and they aren't a nerf they are a variant of HAVs.
Have you seen the bonuses the enforcers get? Blasters and missiles, not rail guns. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
192
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 05:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rogatien Merc wrote:Tank? Unless they want to go full Mechwarrior up in this *****, honestly thinking it's either a Heavy on steroids with 2x small turrets ... or an LAV that steps on you.
Nerf getting stepped on.
Edit: Actually... dual wield heavy weapons makes more sense.
I'd take the HMG with 3x the ammo the heavy has, due to it being a highly mobile vehicle. |
|
|
| |
|