|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1572
   |
Posted - 2013.06.14 01:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
I posted this several builds ago (who knows where it is) but here goes again.
Swarm launchers should get 1 new variant (breach), and a redo of the assault variant
Currently, the assault variant is completely useless, because locking onto 2 targets at once just is.
Instead, there should be 2 new types.
Currently, regular swarm launchers do 330 damage per missile.
STD has 4 missiles (1320) damage), ADV 5 (1650), and PRO 6 (1980)
The new assault swarm launchers will focus on increasing missiles per swarm
At 220 damage per missile
STD has 6 missiles (1320), ADV 7 (1540), and PRO 8 (1760)
As you can see, there's a slight damage decrease, but a much higher chance to hit
Lastly, Breach swarm launchers will do more damage per missile, as to be more effective when you're sure to hit
At 700 damage per missile
STD has 2 missiles (1400) ADV 3 (2100), and PRO 4 (2800)
This leaves a massive damage increase, but having a missile miss the target would drastically decrease total damage.
What does everyone think? |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1572
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 01:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I posted this several builds ago (who knows where it is) but here goes again.
Swarm launchers should get a redo of the assault variant
Currently, the assault variant is completely useless, because locking onto 2 targets at once just is.
Currently, regular swarm launchers do 330 damage per missile.
STD has 4 missiles (1320) damage), ADV 5 (1650), and PRO 6 (1980)
The new assault swarm launchers will focus on increasing missiles per swarm
At 220 damage per missile
STD has 6 missiles (1320), ADV 7 (1540), and PRO 8 (1760)
As you can see, there's a slight damage decrease, but a much higher chance to hit
What does everyone think? Fixed.
What's wrong with breach? |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1572
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 01:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:A bit high on the dammage values for a lock on wepon reffering to your breech model of course . Bit before any new swarms are introduced id like to see ccp fix the invisible swarm glitch
If you can throw out better stats, please feel free to suggest it. My defense is lowering the damage would make it too weak at STD level.
I think it should be fine because in my experience, it isn't often that every swarm in the volley hits. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1572
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 01:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Psychotic Shooter wrote:Nerf AVnade and swarms and we will be fine
AV nades are fine this build. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1572
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 01:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Assault should have a dumb fire setting, but an arming distance of 20 meters.
I would like it, but I don't think CCP is ever going back to dumbfire with those. The first build of semi-open beta was terrible with dumbfire, and apparently nerfing splash didn't help. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1579
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 15:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Psychotic Shooter wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Psychotic Shooter wrote:Nerf AVnade and swarms and we will be fine
AV nades are fine this build. Are you tarded AV nades are not fine
It takes 2 to destroy a starter fit LAV. If your HAV gets blown up, either it's a bery high-tier grenade, or you just sat there to get hit repeatedly |
|
|
| |
|