Well I know there is in theory something very wrong between armor and shields and its a bit lopsided favoring shields but right now the tools required to correct this has not made it into the game yet.

P.S: When I say Armor tank and Shield tank I do not refer to a class who COMPLETELY depends on the tanking style, what I mean is a class who gets the majority of its EHP from said style. No suit should entirely depend on a specific style.

Amarr sentinel is a dual tank, the suit comes with 466 base shields.

I never called it a shield tank, I called it a dual tank. Also Amarr and Gallente are predominantly armor tanks, I was just pointing out that the Amarr has shields to prove that no class is suited for one tanking style alone.

reative is wayy to much pg there i mean i get it being more PG, and i like the hp number sure, but when a suit has 66 base ish pg more than 20 on 1 module is way to much
especially since amarr is armor liking and scramblers are 20 pg

it's just too much logi are like the only ones that could hope to fit one and not seriously screw wit the fit

All the numbers you suggested are really wonky and hurt my eyes to sort through this number soup.

Ferroscales do not bring anything to the table to be worth using with your stats, although the have no movement penalty they have a pretty high CPU/PG cost and the HP is rather low. The CPU/PG costs of reactives are insanely high, I understand your suggesting that plates aren't meant to be stacked, in your opinion, but if that's the case whats the difference between your plates and our plates since our plates can't be stacked either. The HP for reactives is also way to high, they should fall in line with the HP of shield extenders and have very low speed penalties to make it useful for medium armor suits, or front-line suits.

Overall your stats have more penalties than the plates we have now, reactives are rather OP even though they can't be stacked, and instead of balancing it just flips the switch as to why armor tanks cannot compete with shield tanks. Instead of not being able to compete in terms of speed penalties and resistances, it would be the level of weapons and equipment we CAN'T equip because our modules will be hogging all of our resources.

IMO the best balance for the armor would be

Normal plates: High HP-High speed penalty-Low CPU/PG

Ferroscale plates: Medium HP-No penalty-Highest CPU/PG costs (Not by much)

Reactive plates: Low HP-Repair half of a repairer of same tier-Medium CPU/PG costs

Armor repairers: no HP- High repair 2/4/6- CPU/PG costs between reactives and ferroscale.

IMO the best balance for the armor would be

Normal plates: High HP-High speed penalty-Low CPU/PG

Ferroscale plates: Medium HP-No penalty-Highest CPU/PG costs (Not by much)

Reactive plates: Low HP-Repair half of a repairer of same tier-Medium CPU/PG costs

Ferroscales are fine in HP, but their CPU/PG should be increased slightly higher than armor repairers. PG of armor repairers should be buffed back to normal, and scale down the penalty of armor plates to be whole numbers because in Dust decimals round up. The HP of normal plates is very good compared to their CPU/PG costs and penalty.

Also when I said that reactives should be the same as shield plates its so that they benefit the medium suits the most, while normal plates and ferroscale would benefit heavy suits the most. Of course each suit can choose out of one another like a reactive stacked heavy or a ferro stacked medium, but the idea is to bring medium armor suits in line with the Minmatar and Caldari, and put heavies as the highest EHP by a lot.

EDIT: New stats are a bit more reasonable.

Here is a fitting tool with your revised stats implemented into it.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhnLhOBhdjKOdERzT3RQX2NUWVlyTjllNHFOYl9BaUE&usp=sharing

I second this, militia reppies to high slot is accurate.