|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1858
   |
Posted - 2013.06.10 12:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Salt2131 wrote:INQUISITOR Pardus wrote:lol quoting Wikipedia as an actual source. since when was wikipedia an unreliable source? Wait nevermind, i know the answer As soon as it doesnt agree with you
Uh, you're obviously not familiar with how to use Wikipedia as a research source on something like a college paper.
You follow the page citations back to the original sources and then cite those. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1858
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 12:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Salt2131 wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Salt2131 wrote:INQUISITOR Pardus wrote:lol quoting Wikipedia as an actual source. since when was wikipedia an unreliable source? Wait nevermind, i know the answer As soon as it doesnt agree with you Uh, you're obviously not familiar with how to use Wikipedia as a research source on something like a college paper. You follow the page citations back to the original sources and then cite those. Just cause its not the original source doesnt mean its not a reliable one or cant be used as a source on your college paper. dumbass
Not sure what school you're going to, brah.
In any case, as I've said in other threads, CCP is trying to keep this under the rug until they fix it, but a new hire to their company ****** the backend database so bad they're still trying to fix it weeks after the fact, and half the balance issues we have right now came from all the data other than Instant Battle being left out of the balance tweaks because no one realized it was messed up until it was too late.
Expect to see a DevBlog detailing this when they get it sorted out. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1859
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 13:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tectonious Falcon wrote:Salt2131 wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Salt2131 wrote:INQUISITOR Pardus wrote:lol quoting Wikipedia as an actual source. since when was wikipedia an unreliable source? Wait nevermind, i know the answer As soon as it doesnt agree with you Uh, you're obviously not familiar with how to use Wikipedia as a research source on something like a college paper. You follow the page citations back to the original sources and then cite those. Just cause its not the original source doesnt mean its not a reliable one or cant be used as a source on your college paper. dumbass Wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it.
^This.
Friend of mine in high-school demonstrated this not long before the Moderation Council was implemented.
He went to the George Washington page and typed "I like cheese" into the middle of a paragraph he selected at random.
It was 3 days before it was noticed and corrected. |
|
|
| |
|