|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
525
   |
Posted - 2013.06.08 14:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
It might be nice if there wasn't always so much LAV killing. I mean, if we look back at real battlefields in the past it wasn't all about people driving jeeps through enemy lines and running over all the officers.
It's easier to be aware, find cover, and shoot the crap out of the vehicle (even with several infantry weapons) until either it, the driver, or both are dead than the game conveys.
Have the LAVs take damage when they hit a pedestrian. I can't run down cattle with my car and expect to be able to drive to the next farm after I finish off Bessie's herd.
So, I'm talking about the B word I suppose. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
526
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Just let infantry weapons whittle away at LAVs. If they go into enemy filled territory they should be able to be brought down -- they aren't tanks. I don't know... maybe 20-30% effectiveness or something.
It would at least up the risk.
And, yes, though i often get the swarms out LAVs are often fast enough to take a hit and zip across the field back out of range before zooming in for another lap.
We just need a way to get appropriate risk and reward metrics. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
527
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:
Nope
Not until stupid ppl realise that AV is needed to kill vehicles and not an AR
Sounds like someone is leaning on the LAV crutch. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
527
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Crash Monster wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:
Nope
Not until stupid ppl realise that AV is needed to kill vehicles and not an AR
Sounds like someone is leaning on the LAV crutch. 14mil of SP all into vehicles, i drive the Logi LAV and have it pimped out Fast and **** Resistances easy over 50% By the time you lock on im gone By the time you throw that nade your dead By the time you look both ways your dead Stop crying to get the best LAV in the game nerfed and milita are easy enough to take out, but i do agree that the milita HP buff wasnt needed but still easy to kill
I have no issue with investment in LAVs making them better. I also realize that some LAVs are hard to take down with swarms -- particularly the ones with serious investment.
However, this does not imply that LAVs are set up with appropriate risk/reward when it comes to running people down. The terrain does not offer enough places for infantry to be inaccessible. Short of a tank it should be possible for infantry, especially with combined fire, to cause meaningful damage to LAVs. IIf someone takes several assault rifle clips to my car I wouldn't expect to be driving it. Alternately, hitting deer, moose, cattle or other objects can cause serious damage at speed. LAVs aren't tanks.
Tanks are supposed to be tanks.
Sorry that I'm kicking your crutch... as I'm sure its fun to pwn, but it just isn't realistic the way things are. And no, I'm not asking for a huge nerf. I'm suggesting to add some realism so that its fun for all parties... meaning both infantry and LAVs. |
|
|
| |
|