|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
59
   |
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
If only there were a grenade that destroyed LAVS....
I know this sounds OP but lets make the grenade actually home in on the LAV like a heat seeking missle.
Maybe you could carry 3 of them and nanohives would refill you when you run out.
Idk just a thought on how to fix the LAV problem |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 22:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Adding a new grenade = awesome
Already got your solution = awesome
Coming up with lame excuses = pathetic |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 23:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:KOBLAKA1 wrote:I see what you did there...
But how about an emp grenade (only carry 1) disables vehicle movement for 10 seconds That's a grea- no -_- Seriously anti vehicle is becoming more and more accessible to non AV users.
I disagree...
Expanding the game, more options, more variety = Awesome Idea
Nerfing, losing options, less LAVs= Bad idea |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 23:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:It's really easy to see how bad your feelings got hurt by the incoming LAV nerf, Ehko.
its pretty easy to see how delusional you are because my feelings aren't hurt and as far as i know there is no "incoming LAV nerf"
just a bunch of delusional noobs begging for it, which is what im trying to stop
The majority of people in my threads agree with me.......HTFU |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 23:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Full Metal Kitten wrote:What the hell is an Audio Visual grenade gonna do to stop an LAV? Some people, geez.
 |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
62
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 23:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:It takes 2 AV grenades to destroy a militia LAV. Still not enough time for non-scouts. How about you run with your team and have 2 people throw 1 AV nade each. Boom! Problem solved. Also, LAVs should be able to take on 1 solo guy as the LAV should have 3 people in the car. So if you want a one shot AV nade, you are asking for a win button to kill 3 people with one throw. Doesn't make balance sense. Quickly! everyone drop what you're doing and start throwing grenades at a free, fast-moving vehicle that probably already ran someone over by the time I said this!
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ur37r/ |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
62
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 00:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Shadowswipe wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:It takes 2 AV grenades to destroy a militia LAV. Still not enough time for non-scouts. How about you run with your team and have 2 people throw 1 AV nade each. Boom! Problem solved. Also, LAVs should be able to take on 1 solo guy as the LAV should have 3 people in the car. So if you want a one shot AV nade, you are asking for a win button to kill 3 people with one throw. Doesn't make balance sense. Quickly! everyone drop what you're doing and start throwing grenades at a free, fast-moving vehicle that probably already ran someone over by the time I said this! Also, I learned at a very young age to look both ways before crossing the road. Something I learned before kindergarten and has saved countless lives. Maybe they grow up too fast in the future and fail to learn this simple knowledge based life saving technique. BTW, I don't drive anything in Dust, so it is not like I care if they get nerfed or buffed. I won't drive one until they stop soaring like a leaf on the wind, /impaledpilot.
+1 |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
84
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 00:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:EKH0 0ne wrote:If only there were a grenade that destroyed LAVS....
I know this sounds OP but lets make the grenade actually home in on the LAV like a heat seeking missle.
Maybe you could carry 3 of them and nanohives would refill you when you run out.
Idk just a thought on how to fix the LAV problem I've only ran AV nades (packed before, recently exo) and I often get run over by militia LAVs. Or I get hit by the debris of a LAV coming toward me and killed. Or the nade doesn't do any damage and I get run over. Or the nade just duds out and then I get run over. But hey. There is no issue. The murder taxi'ing going on is totally the player's fault for not thinking of using those in-game weapons. Such silly, stupid players and not totally awful gameplay. You're right, buddy. 
http://oi44.tinypic.com/311ksgz.jpg |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 01:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
http://bit.ly/11vN2LS |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 01:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:EKH0 0ne wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:It takes 2 AV grenades to destroy a militia LAV. Still not enough time for non-scouts. How about you run with your team and have 2 people throw 1 AV nade each. Boom! Problem solved. Also, LAVs should be able to take on 1 solo guy as the LAV should have 3 people in the car. So if you want a one shot AV nade, you are asking for a win button to kill 3 people with one throw. Doesn't make balance sense. Quickly! everyone drop what you're doing and start throwing grenades at a free, fast-moving vehicle that probably already ran someone over by the time I said this! http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ur37r/ By the time the first grenade hits (considering you've thrown it at the edge of its range) you don't have enough time to throw a second.
dude, cartman. You have to dodge LAVs not stand in front of them |
|
|
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 02:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
Only one suit moves to slowly, its called a heavy....
BTW, it doesnt matter if he was actually ******** or pretending to be ********.
He either is a ******** person who cant kill LAVs or Pretending to be a ******** person who cant kill AVS
Either way only ******** people cant kill LAVs you understand now |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 03:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:EKH0 0ne wrote:Only one suit moves to slowly, its called a heavy....
BTW, it doesnt matter if he was actually ******** or pretending to be ********.
He either is a ******** person who cant kill LAVs or Pretending to be a ******** person who cant kill AVS
Either way only ******** people cant kill LAVs you understand now ****** ***** ****** *****? ***** *** ****** ***** **** ****!
Now do you understand cartman? |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 06:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
Eldest Dragon wrote:I personally have to agree, everyone who sux just jumps in a lav, basically because then they can get kills, even good players do it bc they can get more kills that way than in a proto suit, with proto mods, and proto weapons and its quite a bit cheaper. If I want to be ran over i'll play frogger and cross the road, I play this game to shoot and be shot at, 2 much road kill for a mmofps if you ask me and way 2 much for my enjoyment. ;)
I personally have to agree, everyone who sux just jumps in a lav, basically because then they can get kills, even good players do it bc they can get more kills that way than in a proto suit, with proto mods, and proto weapons and its quite a bit cheaper
Dude...the only people who suck are the ones getting run over by the huge screaming barn that is an LAV.
. If I want to be ran over i'll play frogger and cross the road, I play this game to shoot and be shot at, 2 much road kill for a mmofps if you ask me and way 2 much for my enjoyment
If you want to get run over then by all means play frogger, if you dont want to get run over in DUST then stop standing in front of the giant car coming straight at you. |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 06:34:00 -
[14] - Quote
Mitsuko'Souma wrote:The problem is that no one wants to carry around a swarm launcher as their primary weapon. And switching to an anti-AV suit is just annoying and most people don't have enough SP to spec into more than one role anyways. Instead of turning logistics suits into assault suits with more equipment slots, they need to make it so logistics can carry a swarm launcher or other explosive weapon as their secondary weapon with non-refillable ammo. Plenty of soldiers during WWII lugged around a bazooka in addition to their primary weapon, and this is supposed to be the future you say?
If this were to happen you wouldn't hear anyone complaining about LAVs anymore.
So you admit its not the LAVs,
The real problem is : "switching to an anti-AV suit is annoying" and "no one wants to carry around a swarm launcher" |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
108
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 07:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:EKH0 0ne wrote:Xender17 wrote:KOBLAKA1 wrote:I see what you did there...
But how about an emp grenade (only carry 1) disables vehicle movement for 10 seconds That's a grea- no -_- Seriously anti vehicle is becoming more and more accessible to non AV users. I disagree... Expanding the game, more options, more variety = Awesome Idea Nerfing, losing options, less LAVs= Bad idea Expand... ok. Add a grenade that homes in on infantry. Expanding the game, more options, more variety = Awesome Idea :D
....omg dude dont go cartman on me |
EKH0 0ne
R.I.f.t
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 09:26:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tharak Meuridiar wrote:EKH0 0ne wrote:So you admit its not the LAVs,
The real problem is : "switching to an anti-AV suit is annoying" and "no one wants to carry around a swarm launcher" "I keep playing rock every time and for some reason everyone is using paper now. Paper needs teh nerf at so I don't ever have to change tactics." Proud to be scissors arguing against nerfing paper. 
Typical nerf rat |
|
|
| |
|