|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3426
   |
Posted - 2013.06.07 14:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Hell if you join one of tge big 3 you are really unlikly to even get a chance to play pc as most of the bigger corps will only front their A and B teams for pc battles. So realistically the only way most people will get to participate is if more districts and systens are opend up. But even when more distructs ect opeb up there is nothing stopping the big boys from pushing everyone who isnt on par out. And with no whare other than faction warfair and tbh its pretty lame at the moment . We need the return of corp battles to at least get practice fielding 16 man teams.
not true.
idk about others but EoN and i know 100% for sure SyN rotates and lets everyone play, we have a more selective recruitment process anyway so the ppl that actually get in are guaranteed to play if available |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3427
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 14:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:4 pages of nothing but whining If your not good enough to take a district you aint going to be good enough to defend it anyways Working as intended EnglishSnake wrote:How about you fight for a district instead of asking CCP to give you one? ^This. Also, for those who are saying the rewards of holding a District are too low, remember the lessons of null-sec in EVE. If you get too much money for just sitting on something, stagnation becomes the name of the game. What do you think will happen if no new corps/alliances get a shot of fighting over territory? Again...opening more territory will allow for new corps to seize and fight over territory. The big names are in a fight right now to be worried about conquering another region.
Any big name that gets kicked out or beat down too much will simply go to the new region and kick the little corps out
and now it provides a bigger problem cuz it creates LESS conflict because the big boys will spread out pwn the nubs
Another region isnt the answer atm, maybe more districts in MH
what needs to happen is a proper merc system and raiding system/rewards so ppl dont always have to grab grab grab
personally i dont want to hold alot of space for EoN. im comfortable with what we have but that dont mean i wont attack to have fights....raiding needs to be viable.
also keep in mind CRONOS is sitting on a BUNCH of **** they cant hold which also keeps out the little guys |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3429
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 17:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:mikegunnz wrote:I get your point Ydubbs, but as others have said... PC is cutthroat and not necessarily for everyone. Corps/Clans can still participate in Dust. They can group up and do pubs, or even FW.
I'm sure as the player population grows, CCP will add more planets/districts. Then maybe other corps will have a chance for a piece of the pie.
My one suggestion to CCP would be to change the timers to a range, not just a hard time.
As jump said: right now all you have to do is sequence your timers properly and you can hold a very large number of districts with just a small group of players. (assuming they're good enough to keep winning)
If you change the timers to a range. Maybe something like a 3-hour window. This leaves a district vulnerable for longer, meaning that it would take more players to defend the same number of districts, since players cant just log-in just in time for a scheduled match. They would be on-the-fly. Somebody decides to attack at any point during the window. Your corp gets a 10min warning. You have 10min to get a group together. This probably wouldn't be problem if you only have one or two districts. However if you have 10 districsts, all with a 3-hour window, it takes a lot of manpower to defend those. I, personally, don't see a problem with the current system. If you have 10 mins to get people together as opposed to 24 hrs then you will have to live on dust to hold your districts. For a small corp with about 5 districts....can be a busy day for a corp if their timers aren't overlapping.
i also personally dont see a problem with the current timers
a small grp can hold enough if they space it but lets be real not as we are currently witnessing not every corp/alliance is cut out for dealing with a constant siege
players get burnt out being forced to log in everyday to fight alot of fights so its up to u to know how much your corp can realistically manage and this is where alot of corps fail, cuz they just wanna keep grabbin more and more |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
3435
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 05:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Obodiah Garro wrote:
Sure it is, what isn't viable about it? They could introduce it the same way as PI for eve players where as you train a skill to allow another planet to be exploited. It curbs unlimited expansion and promotes competition.
So, tell me how larger corps will not be able to afford to train up an alt specifically so that they can grab more land. Also tell me how smaller corps will be able afford an alt to do something that larger corps can't. Please also tell me how having fewer districts in place now (where the playerbase is relatively small), does NOT promote competition while having more districts for a smaller playerbase would. In case you didn't understand, it's about supply demand. 100 corps fighting over 10 districts yield more competition than 100 corps fighting over 50 districts.
THIS.
PC needs a merc systems, raiding and a much easier way to re-enter if evicted
More districts means less conflict cuz everyone can hit their comfort zone and not want to expand
Making it cramped means ppl always wanna expand |
|
|
| |
|