|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
   |
Posted - 2013.06.06 00:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Militia vehicles need to not exist.
At all.
I don't care what you say because I don't run militia vehicles.
Has nobody realized yet that it's people with experience in the game and greater than 8mil SP, vs people with little to no experience in the game with less than 1mil SP? You want to take away from their experience so we have basically the same people fighting, with an incoming trickle of new people who leave just as fast because everybody is far more advanced than they are?
Hell, I think new people having access to unlimited free vehicles makes it an even playing field. You have access to great AV grenades at relatively cheap cost both SP and ISK wise. It's not my fault you can't bother to use it. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Militia vehicles need to not exist.
At all.
Those are too difficult for you to blow up? |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:I know how to fix this problem..... It's called.... ANTI VEHICLE *GASPS* Here is the problem. You run out of AV, while free LAVs keep spawning at no cost. Eventually even supply depots stop giving you ammo to kill the swarms of LAVs that are being spawned.
Uh..................................................................................................
Press circle, select the same suit. Problem solved.
/your opinion |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Drop LAV HP. That's all that needs to happen. 1 advanced AV or higher should one hit kill militia LAVs. One Proto AV should take out LLAVs. Keep the one hit bumper bash. If you don't like getting run over, use AV. That way LAVs are still decent but they have a counter that actually works.
So why should one PRO AV grenade destroy a Logi LAV that has over 2000 base HP? One of my Limbus fits have 3300 armor. Why should one grenade be able to blow that up? |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Schalac 17 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:I know how to fix this problem..... It's called.... ANTI VEHICLE *GASPS* Here is the problem. You run out of AV, while free LAVs keep spawning at no cost. Eventually even supply depots stop giving you ammo to kill the swarms of LAVs that are being spawned. Uh.................................................................................................. Press circle, select the same suit. Problem solved. /your opinion Unless it is a glitch I am pretty sure you lose the suit when you do this.
................................................................. you're kidding................................................... |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Obodiah Garro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:DS 10 wrote:Drop LAV HP. That's all that needs to happen. 1 advanced AV or higher should one hit kill militia LAVs. One Proto AV should take out LLAVs. Keep the one hit bumper bash. If you don't like getting run over, use AV. That way LAVs are still decent but they have a counter that actually works. So why should one PRO AV grenade destroy a Logi LAV that has over 2000 base HP? One of my Limbus fits have 3300 armor. Why should one grenade be able to blow that up? because its a prototype anti vehicle grenade. a crappy IED can blow a Humvee apart and waste a squad of troops, why wouldn't a futuristic purpose weapon take out its counter part?
Are you thinking of a claymore mine?
Artillery rounds are used for vehicle IEDs. Those are big and very heavy. They're not crappy IEDs. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
XiBravo wrote:Their should be no OHK LAV Vs. Dropsuit either .
The Solution Enemy LAV damage is replaced with the current friendly LAV damage (No damage).
Explain your denial of physics. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Schalac 17 wrote:
Unless it is a glitch I am pretty sure you lose the suit when you do this.
................................................................. you're kidding................................................... [/quote]When I would play heavy I would do this to replenish armor and it cost me a suit. Granted the last time I did this was in chromo and haven't tried it in uprising because I specced out of heavy. Since uprising I have only used the supply depot to change suits. So no I'm not kidding.
[/quote]
I never lost a suit to that. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
XiBravo wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:XiBravo wrote:Their should be no OHK LAV Vs. Dropsuit either .
The Solution Enemy LAV damage is replaced with the current friendly LAV damage (No damage). Explain your denial of physics. Spark u say the same thing about physics all the time. It's funny bc I'm sure u have a middle school understanding of physics. That aside physics mean nothing in a video game. It's about balance and gameplay.
Hit a slab of meat in a butcher shop with a baseball bat, then hit a basketball with same baseball bat.
It literally denies science to say that you shouldn't die when getting hit by a car. In every other game I've played with vehicles, you could kill people by running them over. Why do you want this to be different? Why should it be different in that one aspect?
Just because in the lore, we developed faster than light travel, doesn't mean that cars magically stop killing people. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite
Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 02:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
XiBravo wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:XiBravo wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:XiBravo wrote:Their should be no OHK LAV Vs. Dropsuit either .
The Solution Enemy LAV damage is replaced with the current friendly LAV damage (No damage). Explain your denial of physics. Spark u say the same thing about physics all the time. It's funny bc I'm sure u have a middle school understanding of physics. That aside physics mean nothing in a video game. It's about balance and gameplay. Hit a slab of meat in a butcher shop with a baseball bat, then hit a basketball with same baseball bat. It literally denies science to say that you shouldn't die when getting hit by a car. In every other game I've played with vehicles, you could kill people by running them over. Why do you want this to be different? Why should it be different in that one aspect? Just because in the lore, we developed faster than light travel, doesn't mean that cars magically stop killing people. Sooooo what you're saying its you eat paint chips... Right, it all make sense now.
Still no answer. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|