|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
mikegunnz
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
606
   |
Posted - 2013.06.05 19:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
1. PDiggy is a skilled player. (not as good as me, but really good)
2. Tac was OP. Sure it needed to be toned down.
3. Hipfire nerf, fine.
4. ROF nerf, fine.
5. Mag capacity nerf, questionable. 24 rounds might have been ok, but 18 is stupid. Gun is now crap.
Why? Use your brain. A good player will probably be able to hit with 2/3 of their shots on any AVERAGE day.
Duv Tact has 78 dmg per round x 18 rounds, means 1404 dmg per magazine. 2/3 of that is around 927dmg. This means that a GOOD player, cant kill a heavy with one magazine. They'll barely be able to kill a tanked assault if they hit 2/3 of their shots.
All the other ARs can EASILY kill a Heavy with one magazine. Might even have enough left over to kill an assault without reloading. How does this make sense? |
mikegunnz
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
606
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 19:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Don Von Hulio wrote:LOL all these people mad about the clip size. Oh noes, you have to reload now when shooting a heavy.... how sad. I like how you are not factoring headshots....
L2P like everyone else without a noob cannon.
Clearly math is not your strongest subject. The Tac Ars now do around 60-65% of the damage output per magazine that the other ARs do.
All ARs don't need to have the same dmg per magazine, but it should be closer than that. |
mikegunnz
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
606
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 19:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
EVEry DUSTOID wrote:mikegunnz wrote:1. PDiggy is a skilled player. (not as good as me, but really good)
2. Tac was OP. Sure it needed to be toned down.
3. Hipfire nerf, fine.
4. ROF nerf, fine.
5. Mag capacity nerf, questionable. 24 rounds might have been ok, but 18 is stupid. Gun is now crap.
Why? Use your brain. A good player will probably be able to hit with 2/3 of their shots on any AVERAGE day.
Duv Tact has 78 dmg per round x 18 rounds, means 1404 dmg per magazine. 2/3 of that is around 927dmg. This means that a GOOD player, cant kill a heavy with one magazine. They'll barely be able to kill a tanked assault if they hit 2/3 of their shots.
All the other ARs can EASILY kill a Heavy with one magazine. Might even have enough left over to kill an assault without reloading. How does this make sense? who is this?
lol, doubt you know me. (don't play that much) was in PFB.
PS. #1 is just me pokin' fun. chillax. |
mikegunnz
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
606
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 20:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Zahle Undt wrote:mikegunnz wrote:Don Von Hulio wrote:LOL all these people mad about the clip size. Oh noes, you have to reload now when shooting a heavy.... how sad. I like how you are not factoring headshots....
L2P like everyone else without a noob cannon. Clearly math is not your strongest subject. The Tac Ars now do around 60-65% of the damage output per magazine that the other ARs do. All ARs don't need to have the same dmg per magazine, but it should be closer than that. Why should they do the same damage when they have better range and accuracy? That's the trade off, if you want to do more damage quicker you have to get closer, if you want increased range and accuracy you have to trade some of that killing power. What made the Tac OP was it not having any deficiencies, it was the best at range and in close. Edit: I realize you said they don't need to have the same, but just closer. But I still think a good player with a Tac will still be good its just the mediocre players who thought they were gods of Dust because of an OP gun that will really be affected negatively.
The nerfed hipfire and ROF would have been perfect to balance the TAR against other guns. Reducing the capacity to 18 is overkill. |
|
|
| |
|