|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 19:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
I love all the ppl with horrible KDRs bragging on how they always pwn imperfects in pub matches. |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 20:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
hooc order wrote:semperfi1999 wrote:I love all the ppl with horrible KDRs bragging on how they always pwn imperfects in pub matches. I love how someone with such a low a KDR / SP thinks he is good. You are carried scrub.
You just made me LOL........... |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 20:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:ReGnYuM wrote:hooc order wrote:semperfi1999 wrote:I love all the ppl with horrible KDRs bragging on how they always pwn imperfects in pub matches. I love how someone with such a low a KDR / SP thinks he is good. You are carried scrub. Be thankful your corp is not good enough for PC because I would hate to see you corp disband. Forum peasant you know you could just face him one on one and prove he's wrong....the fact that you need pc and a corp battle to counter a comment on you being carried is just wrong.
In this game 1 on 1 means 1 or both ppl hide in the mountains trying to snipe eachother thinking that whoever wins proves that they are the greatest. The test on this game of how good you are is how well you do when its 16v16 competitive players calling strategies and different techniques to win. |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 20:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Brutus Hawke wrote:gbghg wrote:So what your saying is that STB have never heard of a thing called planning? And as can be expected they got completely owned going up against the imperfects? Hey, we crush you every time we face you, whether its a 187. PC match or SVER one. I don't know why you're talking
You might want to look up the Ad Hominem fallacy and educate yourself there brutus.
Assuming your telling the truth....just because you beat him and his corp mates in PC that doesnt make his statement any less true. |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 21:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:hooc order wrote:ReGnYuM wrote:hooc order wrote:semperfi1999 wrote:I love all the ppl with horrible KDRs bragging on how they always pwn imperfects in pub matches. I love how someone with such a low a KDR / SP thinks he is good. You are carried scrub. Be thankful your corp is not good enough for PC because I would hate to see you corp disband. Forum peasant 10 million SP does not mean you are good. All it means is you have been here longer. The fact that this alludes you only proves you are a scrub. But yeah keep clinging to your 10 million SP, PC districts, and carried KDR like it means anything....it is good for the LuLz and the impending sweet taste of your bitter tears. So - the fact they keep winning 95% of all there PC battles means.. nothing? Lol - I love people who think they're tough on the forums then refuse to back it up in game.
Sota they dont want the crushing reality that would be placed right before them if they had to face us............ |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 22:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Commander Tuna wrote:Imperfects sure love to pubstomp.
What else can we do once we have fought all of our PC battles. Heck half of our PC battles are glorified pub stomps anyway. |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
484
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 22:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Um HOOC you realize that even without booster if you started when the game went to open beta then you are close to getting 10 mill SP right? I have 8.6 mill SP and I have hit almost every SP cap. If you used even 1 30day booster for passive and active then you would have over 10 mill SP. I would say the majority of players who have been here since the open beta have more than 10 mill SP.
Oh and in reality one only really needs about 5 mill SP to be competitive against proto tiered players. |
|
|
|