|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians
Orion Empire
229
   |
Posted - 2013.06.03 16:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Severance Pay wrote:Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:So we've had all kinds of conspiracies so far.
- BPOs not being refunded.
- Manhunt event delayed.
- ISK issues, making everyone rich...
- ISK 'solution' issues, making people worse off than they should be.
And now this 'server outage'?
Either CCP's servers ****ing suck.
or they are up to something.. -_- To say there is a conspiracy you need a theory. You can't just say... "Sky is blue! Grass is green! Water is wet, So is my bed! Arrrgh conspiracy!"
A theory is a falsifiable, testable and preferrably confirmed explanation of an observation. A theory also needs to have a defined area of validity and must provide a basis for testable predictions in that area.
Conspiracy "theory" is an oxymoron. What the word describes is rather a "weak hypothesis" at best and "made up ****" at worst. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians
Orion Empire
230
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 16:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:gbghg wrote:Tin foil hats everyone. Do we have nothing more to say? Or are we just eavesdropping between posts to try and make a clever-sounding statement for thumbs ups? Get out of here, I didn't want to see what childish and idiotic reply you could have thought of. If you're going to reply, at least take the effort to constructively destabilise my argument. Goddamned kid. You don't have an argument in the first place. All you provide is a short list of unrelated observations and a completely useless hypothesis that is largely based on a confusion of correlation and causation.
You have yet to show why your hypothesis is even worth considering and thus very, very far away from demanding falsification of your baseless claims. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians
Orion Empire
231
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 16:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:You don't have an argument in the first place. All you provide is a short list of unrelated observations and a completely useless hypothesis that is largely based on a confusion of correlation and causation.
You have yet to show why your hypothesis is even worth considering and thus very, very far away from demanding falsification of your baseless claims. Two wrongs don't make a right, now get the hell out of my thread. Severance Pay wrote:
Lol, all you did was spout a few facts and didn't designate where thry are leading or how they are related. Seriously dude?
I did say how they were related, go and look again before posting so you can spare us your stupidity, thanks.
There we have it ladies and gentlemen. A prime expample of the Dunning Kruger effect in action. I'd like to advice you to go read a book, Sir. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians
Orion Empire
231
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 16:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:"Up to something" isn't much of a "theory". The level of depth and confidence in your theory is right up there with "I think I might actually exist".  Nonetheless it is a theory, and unless it is clearly made apparent on the internet the degree of a theory to be valid (which is as absurd as saying an opinion is wrong), I will continue to generate them. It is not a theory. You are beeing handed all the knowledge you need to realize that you are wrong about pretty much everything you said in this thread, yet you refuse to even look at the most basic rules of logic and how to construct a proper argument and just keep repeating falsehoods. |
Malkai Inos
The Vanguardians
Orion Empire
233
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:"Up to something" isn't much of a "theory". The level of depth and confidence in your theory is right up there with "I think I might actually exist". Nonetheless it is a theory, and unless it is clearly made apparent on the internet the degree of a theory to be valid (which is as absurd as saying an opinion is wrong), I will continue to generate them. It is not a theory. You are beeing handed all the knowledge you need to realize that you are wrong about pretty much everything you said in this thread, yet you refuse to even look at the most basic rules of logic and how to construct a proper argument and just keep repeating falsehoods. How can my opinion be wrong / false? -_- The theory about The Big Bang probably has flaws, but no one says 'it is wrong'. Opinions don't have to be wrong because they are completely useless by themselves. If you want to define all your earlier posts as "opinion" that's fine by me because it makes all of what you stated in this thread completely irrelevant and your argument void.
|
|
|
| |
|