| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1424
   |
Posted - 2013.06.01 06:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
First off, I'd like to get the one true implementation of how this will work out of the way for all to see and then explain all of it afterward.
Make MCC's an item that is either manufactured or purchased by corporations/alliances.
Here's why:
If a Defender does not currently own an MCC or simply does not have one staged over a district and the attacker does not deploy one - than the game mode should default to Ambush/Ambush OMS.
In the event that the Attacker has an MCC deployed to the district but the Defender does not, the match should default to Skirmish 1.0
In the event that both sides possess an MCC that is on site, the match defaults to Skirmish 2.0
Now, obviously you're probably wondering: "What happens if the Defender has an MCC but the Attacker does not?"
Welp, looks like it's an option for a new game mode discussion friends. |
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1424
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 09:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Changed title to make more sense |
EXASTRA INVICTAS
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 09:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
A defender MCC with no attack game mode could become an offshoot of Skirmish where victory for the Attackers comes from either clone depletion or MCC destruction, but for defenders can only come from clone depletion?
Eh, that doesn't sound too good actually. I'm sure someone else can come up with a better idea. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
4163
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 09:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
This makes sense, I like it. |
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1427
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 09:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
EXASTRA INVICTAS wrote:A defender MCC with no attack game mode could become an offshoot of Skirmish where victory for the Attackers comes from either clone depletion or MCC destruction, but for defenders can only come from clone depletion?
Eh, that doesn't sound too good actually. I'm sure someone else can come up with a better idea.
Could make it to where the defenders have to seize control of or outright destroy an MCC killer turret. Sort of like a hybrid between skirmish 1.0 before the MCC starts moving and Domination. |
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1430
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 18:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Actually, does anyone remember assault lines mode in Battlefield 2142? Could do something like that |
tander09
RISE OF THE EMPIRE
The Superpowers
16
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 04:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
dont you know how much MCCs cost?
-1 |
xprotoman23
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
1802
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 05:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Players still part of NPC corporations shouldn't have any opinion on PC until they actively participate. |
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1433
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 05:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Players still part of NPC corporations shouldn't have any opinion on PC until they actively participate.
Still? I was part of PFBHz, brosef. I didn't much have a choice in the matter. Soooooooo bugger off and go QQ about Templars. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
4235
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 13:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
I still like this idea |
|
|
Aeon Amadi
Mannar Focused Warfare
Gallente Federation
1447
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 01:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:I still like this idea
Would definitely add a fresh dynamic to the game |
Terry Webber
Turalyon Plus
101
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 02:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
I think Skirmish 1.0 can be possible in all of these scenarios. The MCCs provide precision strikes and a spawn point. If the MCCs aren't available, you can't use the precision strikes or the spawn point. |
Terry Webber
Turalyon Plus
106
|
Posted - 2013.06.12 14:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bumping so more people can see this. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |