|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kain Spero
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1500
   |
Posted - 2013.05.30 20:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
While our focus right now is helping to deepen the relationship between the CPM and CCP, it does not change the fact that establishing a player elected council is the main goal that the CPM was appointed for, and it is a task that I will gladly look forward to helping accomplish.
The CPM is also dedicated to doing our best to make sure that the community's voice is heard loud and clear by CCP. |
Kain Spero
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1563
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 15:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
I know that the one of the main reasons I signed up for the CPM was to establish a voting procedure for a player-elected CPM1.
Not really much action on that front. I know one thing is clear I think that whatever we end up with in terms of the voting procedure none of the CPM0 should be elegible to run for CPM1.
Also, i think it should be abundantly clear that the players should have full control over who is selected to run and the idea of any CCP appointed Councilors should be thrown out the window. |
Kain Spero
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1563
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 17:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:[quote=Kain Spero]I know that the one of the main reasons I signed up for the CPM was to establish a voting procedure for a player-elected CPM1.
It *IS* important that we come up with a fair system of election. As the CPMs are in charge of making such a system, bias may be introduced as a means to secure re-election. In such a scenario the CPM0 ban makes sense as a safeguard...
Absolutely this. People don't need to establishing a voting system and then running themselves for election. Even if we somehow ened up with an appointment system (which would be awful IMO) that would be double the reason to make sure that CPM0 is not elegible for CPM1. |
Kain Spero
Spero Escrow Services
1838
|
Posted - 2013.07.16 19:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Klivve Cussler wrote:What's the term limit in the CSM?
I find it interesting that the default for any term limit seems to be "two". Is this because the US Presidential term limit is currently two? I come from a country with no term limits, so it seems interesting to me.
In any case, the term limit for a position like this, in my opinion, is primarily to reduce burnout. By making people take a break, we avoid the implied obligation to run again if you are currently in a position to win again. I'm not certain that the other purpose of term limits, which is to limit corruption, applies to this situation.
There is no term limit for the CSM. For example Trebor Daehdoow has been on CSM 5 through CSM 8. |
|
|
| |
|