DUST Search - 0uter.Heaven

All Channels

The War Room

0uter.Heaven

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 81	Posted - 2013.06.10 03:58:00 - [1] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: GetShotUp wrote: Sontie wrote: Why have you guys not attacked NF yet? With the concentration of talent in OH and skill of the Hellstorm A team, I think only NF would be a good fight for you. I think top players of O.H and HS can take on NF but idk if that'll ever happen. How interesting I bet you could. I guess both sides have more important things to do right now.NF and OH/Hellstorm are both pretty loaded with talent right now... Both sides would lose battles to be sure. I think they would take you in a war because they are more dedicated. One loss and they sent up the bat signal. They had a fairly solid team for that second match and they managed to field something like 9 better players for the third match. They also probably have more money than you. A lot of respect for both crews. Hopefully you guys can decide which is the better group in a limited fashion.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 81	Posted - 2013.06.10 04:46:00 - [2] - Quote Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: GetShotUp wrote: Sontie wrote: Why have you guys not attacked NF yet? With the concentration of talent in OH and skill of the Hellstorm A team, I think only NF would be a good fight for you. I think top players of O.H and HS can take on NF but idk if that'll ever happen. How interesting I bet you could. I guess both sides have more important things to do right now.NF and OH/Hellstorm are both pretty loaded with talent right now... Both sides would lose battles to be sure. I think they would take you in a war because they are more dedicated. One loss and they sent up the bat signal. They had a fairly solid team for that second match and they managed to field something like 9 better players for the third match. They also probably have more money than you. A lot of respect for both crews. Hopefully you guys can decide which is the better group in a limited fashion. lol why do you keep directing it at me? "take you in a war" ..... "more money than you" Yeah, my bad. Really should have quoted getshotup instead. Shout out to Kono. Couldn't have gotten the win in STB/imps #2 without him.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 85	Posted - 2013.06.12 01:39:00 - [3] - Quote The Info Broker wrote: This thread has become really pointless. THANKS FOR THE REPORT.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers EoN. 85	Posted - 2013.06.12 01:46:00 - [4] - Quote The Info Broker wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: The Info Broker wrote: This thread has become really pointless. THANKS FOR THE REPORT. Haha, I realize it was a bit pointless in itself to comment. I guess I was in pain after reading the last few pages. Normally I enjoy dust drama to a degree. This was a bit beyond my threshold. Just trolling you. You do good work. Your data collecting/publishing skills enrich the community!
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 362	Posted - 2014.01.28 18:15:00 - [5] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: We were gifted a district by a generous corporation that wants to see more competition in PC. Not 2 hours after acquiring our district we were attacked by Nyain San. We beat them back and 1 hour after were attacked by AE. Makes me laugh to think back when Kujo and I talked about PC and how he would never remove a corp from PC completely. Times have changed I guess. One day maybe CCP will fix PC to a point where I can try to grow. Hopefully this corporation will maintain our gift for a few weeks. Is this a QQ post about game mechanics? or a QQ post about getting attacked in a game mode that favors the aggressor?
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 363	Posted - 2014.02.01 20:08:00 - [6] - Quote Arirana wrote: We did it because of the tactical advantage it gave to the coalition that is forming against us. They could take a snag at our districts whenever they wanted, meanwhile all we can do is defend and spend an hour trying to snipe. First: District locking is a legitimate strategy. Second: How aren't you guys hypocrites again? I liked Kujo's meta as much as the next guy, but you just ruined it :(
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 597	Posted - 2014.03.18 16:04:00 - [7] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: I think even tho they haven't said anything about vehicles I pray they looked into them and changed them a little Either Saberwing or Logibro said that they didn't think that any AV changes were to be made in 1.8 in IRC. I think we all made frowny faces :(.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 676	Posted - 2014.04.02 23:14:00 - [8] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: lol might as well. i mean even tho radar has screwed over damn near every corp currently in tsos... i dont think any were actually in the alliance when said shenanigans took place. and with the track record of tsos... they probably would be dumb enough to let history repeat itself yet again. then again i could be wrong... i know some in tso still have a good head on their shoulders. so there's always hope How have we screwed any corp over in TSO's? By playing them in PC and winning? We have never done anything to these corps except play PC. FA has done more to those corps and they were in the alliance. But i digress. I hope to see you tonight cubs. Ill try to take pictures of the kill feed every time i kill you. You have a reputation as a double-dealer/backstabber. You have earned this reputation through multiple instances displaying such behavior. Nothing personal against you myself,but FACT. Also, you actively poached members for an extended period of time.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 676	Posted - 2014.04.03 00:38:00 - [9] - Quote You poached GIANT members, hurting their ability to fight enough that they required EoN. help to field battles. Before this, they had no problem fielding their own battles. Poacher. You attacked Hellstorm unannounced, behaving quite unlike an ally and attempting to gain notoriety at the expense of your ally. Backstabber. You attacked Teamplayers in an attempt to start a war with EoN. without consulting your allies. Stupid and selfish. You joined EoN. (we felt bad for nearly dismantling your corp, biggest mistake that TP made) and then left as soon as the FEC war happened and charged outrageous fees for ringing. Backstabber. Double Dealer. We will never let you hold a district again. If you by chance come into one, it will always be under attack by us. This is what cubs means by "being on the island". You mass attacked your ally AE out of the blue. Backstabber, Double Dealer, Stupid, and Selfish. You have a year long track record of being opportunistic and have regularly taken actions that have harmed those that wished to help you. You will not be taking land tonight or any other night. I pity your allies. I feel bad for your corp members who have been excluded from PC simply because of your involvement with the operation. That being said, you are fun to play with and against. But that doesn't excuse you from receiving the treatment that you have earned based on your actions over the last year.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 680	Posted - 2014.04.03 03:49:00 - [10] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: You poached GIANT members, hurting their ability to fight enough that they required EoN. help to field battles. Before this, they had no problem fielding their own battles. Poacher. You attacked Hellstorm unannounced, behaving quite unlike an ally and attempting to gain notoriety at the expense of your ally. Backstabber. That was a friendly game that was talked about before the atk was sent. If it was backstab we would have attempted to take the district. You attacked Teamplayers in an attempt to start a war with EoN. without consulting your allies. Was not to start a war TP Escalated not 0.H we wanted the district solely because it was on that planet. Stupid and selfish. You joined EoN. (we felt bad for nearly dismantling your corp, biggest mistake that TP made) and then left as soon as the FEC war happened and charged outrageous fees for ringing. This is not backstabbing this is leaving with just cause. Double dealing would involve us consprIring against Eon I Tod you I wanted to be neutral Backstabber. Double Dealer. We will never let you hold a district again. If you by chance come into one, it will always be under attack by us. This is what cubs means by "being on the island". You mass attacked your ally AE out of the blue. Truly they weren't our ally. It wasn't my decision to atk but I will take the blame. I still agree that was stupid. Backstabber, Double Dealer, Stupid, and Selfish. You have a year long track record of being opportunistic and have regularly taken actions that have harmed those that wished to help you, for short term gain. You will not be taking land tonight or any other night. I pity your allies. I feel bad for your corp members who have been excluded from PC simply because of your involvement with the operation. That being said, you are fun to play with and against. But that doesn't excuse you from receiving the treatment that you have earned based on your actions over the last year. Quoting you quoting me.

Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 690	Posted - 2014.04.03 17:01:00 - [11] - Quote If you didn't want to be in EoN. then you shouldn't have joined EoN.. Plenty of outside corporations were at least marginally successful during that time period. Instead you joined, collected loot and bided your time until you could abandon us. Don't confuse my in-game/forum posts to how I would react in a real life situation. In real life we would probably laugh about all this while drinking a beer. But I would make sure that we are on separate tabs Butthurt high school girl or not, one important thing to realize is in the PC game mode, the people with the best power/logistic/player setup gets to dictate the terms of the game. In this game mode loyalty and trustworthiness are important. I simply named specific incidents an listed the shared perception of myself and Teamplayers (Most of EoN. share these perceptions as well). I have a feeling that most of the people who have been involved with PC for any period of time feel likewise.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 759	Posted - 2014.04.12 03:43:00 - [12] - Quote Still have to defend it :D. Or not, could just lock it up.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 759	Posted - 2014.04.12 21:10:00 - [13] - Quote BLUNT SMKR wrote: was some gg OH i enjoyed the fights RND doesnt get many fights like some of the other top DNS corps so we may not be on point sometimes but with every loss we learn alot so its all good I was actually bout to give up on dust cause ** was boring but this week was ight hope to have more PC again soon N for people complaining about DNS it doesnt matter how many top players they got cause it just comes dwn to 16v16 so if u have a solid 16 u should have no problem winning battles against DNS An also when u fight RND u fight mostly RND we try not to use ringers unless we have to The last OH battle we did have 6 ringers i think wich is uncommon for us but it was a fri XeroTheBigBoss wrote:** It was a good match Radar :) I can't believe you guys won with like 9 clones vs RND 66 clones. Hopefully next time they don't hide and give the game away. When the enemy is that low on clones and you have that big of a clone advantage you should be mass zerging for every little kill OR point one or the other. Either way would of resulted in a win. Was fun :) really? this is why i hate ringers From the sounds of it, everyone involved had areas that could have been improved. I was listening to comms, and everyone involved (ringers included) could have reacted better to the events in the game. I don't agree with how Xero summarized it (I wasn't actually in the game of course), but everyone learned and will be ready next time.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 824	Posted - 2014.05.08 07:00:00 - [14] - Quote 1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote: 0.H successfully defended our single remaining district against ERA tonight. You guys are getting complacent, you had to work with 120 clones yet you pushed as if you sent 449 against us, like you usually do, but at least those EVE OBs helped you kill off some of our clones, We here in 0.H are used to winning with clone packs and dropping OBs earned with blood, sweat and tears, it's not easy when the tables are turned is it? Looking forward to the next one. Special thanks to D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N for the much appreciated assitance o7 Forever yours. Signed, Keep yourself in check now, I don't get many OB kills vs you guys. Might have something to do with how many scouts you bring? Not going to accuse you of FOTM though, you guys have always loved scouts. The one good OB I have gotten against you was when the match was already over. Also, you have a very low success rate against ERA with clone packs as well. Here is a challenge for you: ERA will leave it's districts unlocked if you do. Ok, I just got done unlocking them. Your turn.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 838	Posted - 2014.05.08 19:40:00 - [15] - Quote 1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote: In terms of your challenge? I refuse, don't insult me by thinking I would ever play the game by your rules. We dictate our own rules of engagement. 0.H has constantly been a part of the grand challenge of fighting you, and your many corp names, over the previous months. It has been do or die for us day in and day out but its a necessary effort to uphold the 0.H Mentality and do our part to **** on your plans. We will do our best to continue being a pain in your ass, a pain that makes you bleed when you reach down to try and scratch it, and we will continue for as long as we have the players willing to do so. We don't have an abundance of talented players all under an alliance like you do, we don't have the luxury of sending 450 clones every battle or dropping EVE OBs every 3 minutes like you do, and we don't have the opulence from the bottomless coin purse you have established over the months of supremacy provides you, like you do. But there is one thing you will never have; a community... no, a family who's strength surpasses utter losses and defeat, who will always be the counterbalance to whatever evil or greed aims for complete dominance. You can try to beat us down however you will never kill us off. To the community of Dust514 who is still here and still willing to fight, follow Dark Legion's example and build up a team. If there was ever a time to rise up and follow suit, this is it. Start building, start training and keep a keen eye on the horizon. Long live 0uter.Heaven. Drinking Radar's homebrew Kool-Aid. If you stick around long enough, you guys might actually be the best. There is a time where we could have utterly defeated you. We propped you up and put you in an alliance with us instead, only for Radar to betray us at the first available opportunity. You can continue to rally the troops, but let it be known that PFC is ONLY being re-established after 100% And your districts will ALWAYS be under attack by ERA if they are online. We never wanted 100%(AE made that call for us) to start with, but at this point, why not? Radar is a snake. As evident by this thread, all he ever wanted was for him and his creation to be dust famous. 30+ pages of bumping later, he is probably dust famous. But he is DEFINATLY a snake. I missed out on a period where you guys were good without a crutch( I think?). But from what I have seen of your successes, OH seemed to do well when flaylock pistols were overpowered and when cloaking is overpowered. Use this to your advantage while you can (Probably a long time, given the State of Dust). I also say this knowing full well that my ability to operate depends largely on the mass driver being a decent weapon... But hey, I spend more time on the dust forum than I do playing dust... Probably a good call, considering the promise of the game has been taken from it and given to legion.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 839	Posted - 2014.05.08 23:56:00 - [16] - Quote 1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote: WhataguyTTU wrote: Fiddle you keep forgetting what it's like to not be on the side of the almighty power of stacked Corps and alliances Forgetting implies it's something he was familiar with to begin with. When I joined TP, we were losing to Delta Force consistently on the manus peak map.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Dirt Nap Squad. 839	Posted - 2014.05.09 03:00:00 - [17] - Quote 1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote: Fiddlestaxp wrote: When I joined TP, we were losing to Delta Force consistently on the manus peak map. Oh... :( You were questioning if I had ever been on the not stacked side.
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 1122	Posted - 2015.03.14 07:16:00 - [18] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: Guess I have to repost that photo since it's a bug no one has produced or reproduced and I have the only evidence. The convo after it was started on page10 of this thread. I'll repost it later. History? Well since you mentioned it... How many games does it take to get to the center of oh? 9. 9 straight losses and they are all done
Fiddlestaxp TeamPlayers Negative-Feedback 1122	Posted - 2015.03.14 08:37:00 - [19] - Quote Radar R4D-47 wrote: Hmmm Fiddlestaxp... I think I remember you. I'm getting a dinasouar vibe must have something to do with the TeamPlayer tag you have. 9 straight loses and we are done? What does that mean? Does it perhaps refer to our longest losing streak from 2 years ago? Maybe your talking about TeamPlayers since I haven't seen them around. Who knows. Fiddle make sure to go check back in to your museum I think they might miss you. Redline thales to try to make it better. I know that you know. You keep bumping the thread from years ago, ill keep bringing up how insufficient that you were then too.