|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1341
   |
Posted - 2013.05.25 00:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
So instead of responding to the calls for Pilot and AVers joint discussion on matters, you want a AVer crew to block every vehicle proposal to "nerf" AV?
Wot? Most backwards idea ever, thanks. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1341
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 01:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sobeit.
LAVs, to the Van!
HAVs, take the rear and flanks!
Dropships, just fly around and look pretty, thanks guys! |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1342
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 03:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:New order of business: Plasma Cannon
Personally I feel it is a gimmick. It is bad against infantry(not surprising). Impossible to use on dropships and LAV's. Even HAV's are hard to hit when they have a competent driver in control. Opinions?
Plasma Cannon is laughable, everyone knows this. Either higher damage, faster reload speed or a clip instead of one shot, it scratches vehicles, even at proto level and is only good for killing Infantry. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1357
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 16:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Full Metal Kitten wrote:Keep it rolling. New idea: medium frame AV specialist suit to compliment Assault and Logi. Lose sidearm, gain second grenade slot. Role bonus to explosive damage. Discuss.
Nay to the additional grenades, but as a specialization, give each race power to their various weapons, Caldari for example, bonus to explosive damage, Gallente, bonus to shield damage. Would also be a good idea to have a larger ammo capacity per level too, making their usage more viable instead of a scout and swarms. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1363
|
Posted - 2013.05.26 15:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Skyhound Solbrave wrote:I personally think AV is okay, though i just barely started to spec into lvl 3 swarms. The only major issue I have seen is one HAV being so fast, he outran an LAV. He was impossible to hit. Tanks should be tough and powerful, they should never be faster than a jeep. Then again, I have no idea what sacrifices he had to make to be that fast, so I could be talking out of my ass. Probably nanofibers, jovian powerplant and a few shield extenders...
Wrong.
It's simple, Armor Tank, with a powerplant and Nitrous Injector. Armor is now faster than Shield Tanks, and no tanker would be stupid enough to place shields on an Armor Tank as it takes up much needed CPU and PG. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1363
|
Posted - 2013.05.27 02:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Logi LAVs make sense honestly, they need to be strong to fulfil their support role BUT there are issues regarding the LAVs as a whole and would like all AVers feedback here |
|
|
| |
|