| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xprotoman23
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
1595
   |
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Spot on review except for the P2W BS. |
lllIIIlI IIIlIl
Holdfast Syndicate
Amarr Empire
39
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good review. |
Dust CEOM
OverKill Corp
31
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
lllIIIlI IIIlIl wrote:Good review.
bad |
BOOOGERTRON BORTZORG
Expert Intervention
Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
The closing comments pretty much summed it up for me.
Good intentions but poorly executed. |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Well that was fair.
At least he didn't lie *cough*gametrailers*cough*. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1328
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:23:00 -
[6] - Quote
Solid review apart from the p2w comments, reviewers need to spend more time on that section to understand it. |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
RISE of LEGION
1787
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
That was actually the best dust 514 review I've seen, very fair and accurately sums up the plus's and benefits, though he did overdo the P2W thing. |
Snaps Tremor
The Tritan Industries
RISE of LEGION
281
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Solid review apart from the p2w comments, reviewers need to spend more time on that section to understand it.
The emphasis is on CCP to make it more understandable. Nothing needs to be dumbed down to make it clear that AUR weapons are identical guns with lowered skill requirements, but the market goes out of its way to hide that fact. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1402
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
In his defense, it doesn't look like CCP have any real intentions of ACTUALLY removing the P2W aspects anytime soon. I mean, they're still releasing AUR only items that are superior to ISK items. Honestly, I was on CCP's side on this for awhile, because they keep giving the problem lip service. However, just take a look at the Blood Raider Saga for example. It's a regular Saga, but with a MUCH higher shield recharge rate, better than any other LAV in the game.
If they want to people to take the "AUR items just let you get stuff faster" argument seriously, THEY need to take it seriously. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
1603
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:In his defense, it doesn't look like CCP have any real intentions of ACTUALLY removing the P2W aspects anytime soon. I mean, they're still releasing AUR only items that are superior to ISK items. Honestly, I was on CCP's side on this for awhile, because they keep giving the problem lip service. However, just take a look at the Blood Raider Saga for example. It's a regular Saga, but with a MUCH higher shield recharge rate, better than any other LAV in the game.
If they want people to take the "AUR items just let you get stuff faster" argument seriously, THEY need to take it seriously.
CCP took away some of the variation in STD and ADV weapons so no wonder things are perceived as being P2W. When I first started speccing into the SCAR and realized the assault versions were unlocked at levels 4+5 i couldn't help put think things appeared to be P2W. |
|
|
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1403
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
xprotoman23 wrote:Baal Roo wrote:In his defense, it doesn't look like CCP have any real intentions of ACTUALLY removing the P2W aspects anytime soon. I mean, they're still releasing AUR only items that are superior to ISK items. Honestly, I was on CCP's side on this for awhile, because they keep giving the problem lip service. However, just take a look at the Blood Raider Saga for example. It's a regular Saga, but with a MUCH higher shield recharge rate, better than any other LAV in the game.
If they want people to take the "AUR items just let you get stuff faster" argument seriously, THEY need to take it seriously. CCP took away some of the variation in STD and ADV weapons so no wonder things are perceived as being P2W. When I first started speccing into the SCAR and realized the assault versions were unlocked at levels 4+5 i couldn't help put think things appeared to be P2W.
Like I said, as long as they CONTINUE to release AUR only items that don't have ISK equivalent versions the game IS, by definition, P2W.
CCP keeps telling us that it's not their intention to release items like this, and then keep releasing them. How hard is it to pull up the specs of the current ISK versions of an item and cross check the AUR version you're about to release? The obvious conclusion is that, as usual, CCP are saying one thing, but doing something else entirely. I don't know if it's just awful management, or intentional deceit, but neither bodes well. |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
483
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 22:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Solid review apart from the p2w comments, reviewers need to spend more time on that section to understand it.
Its CCPs fault for not explaining it properly. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1672
|
Posted - 2013.05.25 01:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
Omega Booster. Yeah, they enjoy pay to win items. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |