DUST Search - Dust514 meet Section 8

All Channels

General Discussions

Dust514 meet Section 8

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 137	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:24:00 - [1] - Quote SECTOR 8 Does this game look similar? Look at the video and how the aiming tho not perfect, is still a lot better than dust. The game could be called dust grand daddy is nails on a lot of the FPS mechanics. heavy "feel" but without the downgrade to aim. No falling through floor or getting stuck at rock. and for the PVE loving carebares here, SECTION 8 HAD AI BOTS!! DRONES! Your half a team? DRONES TO THE RESCUE! Smart drones. other then KZ2, and arma the AI was very good in here. Too similar to give dust a pass for how it did it's FPS. You guys are playing SECTOR 8 now. just called dust. Did someone say exo-skeleton? yup. I'm posting this up, to see what along with other "complete" FPS games core mechanics can be twicked to give Dust more complete FPS feel. Keep the meta and lore for the eve mmo guys in dust. but KEEP the game play FPS. And a good FPS. I've stocked piled in omega boosters. I might take a break from dust, but I know I'll check back. and hopefully dust would have gotten it's **** together as a FPS EVE GAME. What? you think I trust you guys to watch the ladies for me? greedy cheeky monkeys. I'll be back, if I do leave. For the ladies of course. Hi ladies. give em your smile
PonyClause Rex TRAMADOL KNIGHTS 21	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:26:00 - [2] - Quote Jet packs, can i has?

CCP FoxFour C C P C C P Alliance 4023	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:27:00 - [3] - Quote That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though.

Natu Nobilis BetaMax Beta CRONOS. 322	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:29:00 - [4] - Quote Section 8 Thanks for the reference, i-¦ll try the game out. (Now i want jetpacks, turrets barraging the skies to kill the dropping soldiers, exosqueletons....)
Knight SoIaire Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 570	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:32:00 - [5] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. Section 8 tribute suits please
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3973	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:33:00 - [6] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. Yay! someone else who likes the game.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 137	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:34:00 - [7] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. Oops. and right in front of the ladies.. Thanks man. Just grabbed the you tube vid. It's been a awhile since I've played. And I also played the DLC. Agree with you on all parts.
Rei Shepard Spectre II 303	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:38:00 - [8] - Quote Sadly Section 8 did not have a long life.
Fox Gaden DUST University Ivy League 332	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:45:00 - [9] - Quote All the Section 8 Devs should be allowed to play DUST for free as a tribute! ....Oh wait...
Panther Alpha WarRavens 277	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:51:00 - [10] - Quote Ahh Section 8... I did play that game for a full 10 minutes,...Great game.

D3MON 5280 Neanderthal Nation 0	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:56:00 - [11] - Quote When describing this game to friends, I say it's a combination of MAG & Section 8. I've only been playing for a week and that seems to be an accurate comparison at this point for me.
Coleman Gray GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 294	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:10:00 - [12] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. I'd be willing to bet that when you Devs was thinking on how EVE foot soldiers would be, one of you stumbled across Section 8 and thought, We gonna do that, but muuuuch better"
Spkr4theDead Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 77	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:12:00 - [13] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. It's not even DLC, Prejudice is its own game.
Muramasa Armads Defensores Doctrina 14	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:19:00 - [14] - Quote Section 8 definitely looks a lot like Dust 514. If you only look at the infantry part of the video then you might be able to trick someone into thinking it was a Dust video from the closed beta era. If you take out the jet packs, super sprint, and giant robots then it looks like a carbon copy of Dust 514 when it comes to game play. I have never heard of Section 8, but I definitely see the comparison.
Dr Stabwounds Molon Labe. League of Infamy 38	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:42:00 - [15] - Quote Section 8 was actually pretty cool, too bad no one played it for long. Bots made it okay though.
Ninjanomyx Imperfects Negative-Feedback 70	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:47:00 - [16] - Quote I've always said this since Precursor......... DUST is just MAG w/ less Objectives, Section 8 w/ less Function, StarHawk w/ less RTS, & Battlefield w/ less Flash. Inertia Dampener is just a less used Carbon Copy of Section 8 (You can kill Infantry & damage Installations w/ it in Section 8). The "Dash" in Section 8 is just here in the form of Speed Mods. MAG has Emo Tears when it saw Domination in DUST..... Battlefield says Skirmish 1.0 should be in PC (As does MAG Interdiction). StarHawk says future plans of getting Warbarge Installation Drops belongs to them (Also Jetpacks & better Mechs). Still waiting on that Chat Separation ala MAG tho.....would be nice (CO, SL, & Squad Chats).
StubbyDucky KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 2	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:14:00 - [17] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. I'd be willing to bet that when you Devs was thinking on how EVE foot soldiers would be, one of you stumbled across Section 8 and thought, We gonna do that, but muuuuch better" What happened to the, "but muuuuch better" part?
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. CRONOS. 1623	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:34:00 - [18] - Quote PonyClause Rex wrote: Jet packs, can i has? I pray to whatever deity that this game NEVER sees jetpacks, jumpjets, whatever. It's just a bad idea.
Herpn Derpidus Outkast Blood 22	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:53:00 - [19] - Quote section 8 prejudice was miles ahead of section 8, they really pushed that game in the right direction, there is so much dust can learn from them, with deployables, and the fps mechanics, and well everything, i think im gonna take a break from dust to go play s8p right now lol
IceStormers Forsaken Immortals Gentlemen's Agreement 31	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:56:00 - [20] - Quote lets hope dust does not go the same way

Jason Punk DUST University Ivy League 104	Posted - 2013.05.24 15:59:00 - [21] - Quote Down with Jet packs...but if you use them...you have to consider the effects of gravity ;) Prefer to see them employed in different atmospheres (water/ gas planets)
Asmadai HavoK Core RISE of LEGION 88	Posted - 2013.05.24 16:08:00 - [22] - Quote I believe one of the aiming benefits was that your rounds actually tracked the enemies if you "got a lock" on them. It was like aim assist and bullet assist combined. Was a very good game. Edit: Because I occasionally can't spell
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 4623	Posted - 2013.05.24 21:52:00 - [23] - Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W5lhUAy6hY lol
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 143	Posted - 2013.05.25 03:50:00 - [24] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W5lhUAy6hY lol Ha ha. sadly same happens in dust. out of mcc and face first in to ground! lol
Skipper Jones ZionTCD Unclaimed. 71	Posted - 2013.05.25 04:19:00 - [25] - Quote I love Section 8. One of my favorite shooters on the ps3
Nonya Bizznizz DUST University Ivy League 10	Posted - 2013.05.25 04:50:00 - [26] - Quote Herpn Derpidus wrote: section 8 prejudice was miles ahead of section 8, they really pushed that game in the right direction, there is so much dust can learn from them, with deployables, and the fps mechanics, and well everything, i think im gonna take a break from dust to go play s8p right now lol Deployables were the best part. Squashing people with supply depots or an AA turret really brings me back to when people played Section 8. I DEMAND SEQUEL!!!!
Xocoyol Zaraoul Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 277	Posted - 2013.05.25 05:21:00 - [27] - Quote I've played Section 8 and good god was that game a piece of crap in how ludicrously long it took to kill someone, stupidly high amounts of HP for everything. That's just my take on it, though. It was a cool concept and nifty visuals and gameplay, just absurd durability. S8P though was drastically better... Now that's a fun game.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 143	Posted - 2013.05.25 11:45:00 - [28] - Quote Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: I've played Section 8 and good god was that game a piece of crap in how ludicrously long it took to kill someone, stupidly high amounts of HP for everything. That's just my take on it, though. It was a cool concept and nifty visuals and gameplay, just absurd durability. S8P though was drastically better... Now that's a fun game. S8P was definite better. Did you notice your complaints about part one are the same complaints noobs have about this game? lol
Ayures II Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 137	Posted - 2013.05.25 12:26:00 - [29] - Quote Actually... MCC's, NULL cannons, OB's, it's all there.
Deskalkulos Ildigan CrimeWave Syndicate 125	Posted - 2013.05.25 12:46:00 - [30] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: PonyClause Rex wrote: Jet packs, can i has? I pray to whatever deity that this game NEVER sees jetpacks, jumpjets, whatever. It's just a bad idea. To be fair it worked in other games just fine (namely Section 8 and Killzone 3)

Surt gods end Demon Ronin 144	Posted - 2013.05.25 12:49:00 - [31] - Quote Section 8 Prejudice This was section 8 "sequel" Again, it would be great to have a Assassinate the enemy team leader game mode here. EDIT: might wanna do something about the MCC AFKing for that mode first. Otherwise match could go like this "Assassinate an IMP" Imp is in mcc. "DOH"
Rynoceros One-Armed Bandits Unclaimed. 76	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:08:00 - [32] - Quote Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future.
Crash Monster Snipers Anonymous 378	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:09:00 - [33] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W5lhUAy6hY lol I don't have a video of it but I landed in the toxic waste portion of a dug in installation (out of the MCC). While it was laughable it happened after being killed a couple times... I seriously considered taking my first ragequit!
Ayures II Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 137	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:11:00 - [34] - Quote Rynoceros wrote: Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future. BF2142 did pretty well and was far more similar to DUST than this unknown mech game.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 144	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:19:00 - [35] - Quote Rynoceros wrote: Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future. It's a shame to what happened to that studio. But negative reviews? This is negative reviews.. Metacritic score of Dust514
Nstomper Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 445	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:24:00 - [36] - Quote I enjoyed both section 8 and prejudice it was sad to see that they died off fast
Ayures II Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 137	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:27:00 - [37] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: Rynoceros wrote: Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future. It's a shame to what happened to that studio. But negative reviews? This is negative reviews.. Metacritic score of Dust514 http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/eve-online EVE got ****** reviews when it was new. 10 years later with consistent and constant growth, people take it a lot more seriously. It'll be a few years before DUST really comes into its own. In its current state, it's not even done and should still be in beta, IMO.
Rynoceros One-Armed Bandits Unclaimed. 76	Posted - 2013.05.25 13:33:00 - [38] - Quote Surt gods end wrote: Rynoceros wrote: Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future. It's a shame to what happened to that studio. But negative reviews? This is negative reviews.. Metacritic score of Dust514 Just for comparison, I looked back at their reviews for that "unknown" mech game (Section 8), which scored almost 50% higher than Dust. If heads aren't rolling at CCP, they should be. If everyone is standing around acting like they have a cape and a big S on their chest (which is the reaction I perceive), then save your Aurum fellas - the legal team will not be able to recoup your funds.
Panther Alpha WarRavens 287	Posted - 2013.05.25 14:18:00 - [39] - Quote Rynoceros wrote: Surt gods end wrote: Rynoceros wrote: Same engine, 4 years ago. Soon after... "due to troubled development, the game was released in a rushed, incomplete state and received mostly negative reviews. This led to TimeGate laying off twenty-five members of its staff after its release." "In 2013, it was announced that TimeGate was developing a new free-to-play game, titled Minimum, expected to be release at the end of the year. On 2nd May 2013, it was reported that the studio had filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy." Know your history, know your future. It's a shame to what happened to that studio. But negative reviews? This is negative reviews.. Metacritic score of Dust514 Just for comparison, I looked back at their reviews for that "unknown" mech game (Section 8), which scored almost 50% higher than Dust. If heads aren't rolling at CCP, they should be. If everyone is standing around acting like they have a cape and a big S on their chest (which is the reaction I perceive), then save your Aurum fellas - the legal team will not be able to recoup your funds. Yeah... i'm sock with the comparison too..Section 8 have to be one of the worst games i had ever played . Yet every one is linking the two games together like is a "Good" thing. To don't mention, that Dust 514 is not where near as complete as Section 8 was... which adds to the Puzzle ...I will be ok with Dust 514 been a better version of Section 8.. BUT IS NOT.
Phantasmal Priestess Purgatorium of the Damned League of Infamy 0	Posted - 2013.05.25 15:19:00 - [40] - Quote deleted comment on the failings of Uprising.

DoomLead Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 21	Posted - 2013.06.13 22:05:00 - [41] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. I'd be willing to bet that when you Devs was thinking on how EVE foot soldiers would be, one of you stumbled across Section 8 and thought, We gonna do that, but muuuuch better" Now I have played dust 514 for 2 months and i actually found where you got the idea for dust 514 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j_t_HfLSBs honestly CCP should fire every single person who is on the development team for spending 3 years to develop this game and hire the people who made section 8 prejudice game in 18 months for 3 platforms I know this is extreme but I feel like the idea of dust 514 can have a the same impact as games like doom or halo. the problem is the game is very buggy and has a lack of options it is basically like like battlefield or call of duty. you should reskin section 8 prejudice and make it dust there are a couple of things you would have to make in order for it to work but right now that is a better game and it came out 2 years ago. for everyone who said section 8 was crap Section 8 prejudice has supposedly fixed alot of the issues that were wrong with the original (I never played the Original Section 8). in comparison to dust it is a little easier to play. Dust 514 has better graphics, and dropsuit customization which leads to better survivabilty howver section 8 prejudice has better guns and more customization to the guns. The DCM or Dynamic combat missions make it feel like it you are doing something different every single battle not to mention without any dlc there are 3 different planets that affect your dropsuit differentIy (currently on dust we are fighting on the same planet over and over). I personally would love to see CCP flatout hire the developers for this game and reskin it to fit in the dust lore. Since I downloaded and played this game for the last 2 days I been sitting here playing it like why couldn't dust be more like this. Even with its outdated graphics.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 286	Posted - 2013.06.13 22:33:00 - [42] - Quote Wow.. this thread. @DOOM I Still have this game up on my ps3 and still play it. Wonderfully wicked AI. They can kick your kitten, if your not careful. I've lost conquest match cause I got cocky. you cocky? NEVER! shut up.
Anmol Singh The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 128	Posted - 2013.06.13 22:37:00 - [43] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. this sounds like Dust...
DoomLead Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 21	Posted - 2013.06.13 23:11:00 - [44] - Quote Anmol Singh wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: That would be Section 8. I have it and the stand alone DLC that came out Section 8: Prejudice or whatever. Really good game, never got the attention it should have. I think it lacked reliability. The co-op mode was just so much fun though. this sounds like Dust... watch the video
Andius Fidelitas The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 75	Posted - 2013.06.13 23:15:00 - [45] - Quote Not sure if really good aim, or auto-aiming is activated. Either way, THAT is what Dust should be aiming for in it's hit detection system! THAT's how it's done!


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.