Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
My squad went into a faction warfare battle the other day on the side of the Amarr. We absolutely destroyed our opposition, with them only holding a single objective for a total maximum time of 3 minutes. We held all 5 the entirety of the match outside of those three minutes. The images below are from the result of this match. Lucius Octavion and berzerka fist of the corp, 03M3NT30 M1N02, ended with the warpoint totals you see below. I would like to know how this is possible when your team loses every objective in no more than 3 minutes, you only get 7 kills, you did not use uplinks(the 3rd guy was their uplink guy), and were not supplying logistics the entire match, if at all.
More than anything, if you can explain the 2332 WP, please do because we were dumbfounded.
Their Scores
Our Scores Next to Theirs |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:My squad went into a faction warfare battle the other day on the side of the Amarr. We absolutely destroyed our opposition, with them only holding a single objective for a total maximum time of 3 minutes. We held all 5 the entirety of the match outside of those three minutes. The images below are from the result of this match. Lucius Octavion and berzerka fist of the corp, 03M3NT30 M1N02, ended with the warpoint totals you see below. I would like to know how this is possible when your team loses every objective in no more than 3 minutes, you only get 7 kills, you did not use uplinks(the 3rd guy was their uplink guy), and were not supplying logistics the entire match, if at all. More than anything, if you can explain the 2332 WP, please do because we were dumbfounded. Their ScoresOur Scores Next to Theirs
Squad orders, kills, turret kills, vehicle kills, drop uplink spawns, and resupply/res's/reps.
Basically, a tac-ar logi driving around in an lav, being useful.
EDIT: I just got to your last sentence - how do you know he wasnt? Were u spectating him? Hax?! |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:My squad went into a faction warfare battle the other day on the side of the Amarr. We absolutely destroyed our opposition, with them only holding a single objective for a total maximum time of 3 minutes. We held all 5 the entirety of the match outside of those three minutes. The images below are from the result of this match. Lucius Octavion and berzerka fist of the corp, 03M3NT30 M1N02, ended with the warpoint totals you see below. I would like to know how this is possible when your team loses every objective in no more than 3 minutes, you only get 7 kills, you did not use uplinks(the 3rd guy was their uplink guy), and were not supplying logistics the entire match, if at all. More than anything, if you can explain the 2332 WP, please do because we were dumbfounded. Their ScoresOur Scores Next to Theirs Squad orders, kills, turret kills, vehicle kills, drop uplink spawns, and resupply/res's/reps. Basically, a tac-ar logi driving around in an lav, being useful. I just got to your last sentence - how do you know he wasnt? Were u spectating him? Hax?!
They were in a missle tank in the red line behind "E" the whole match which is why they never died. Even with Squad Orders, their squad would not have given them enough points for the 2332 WP. 1500 would be about where I would draw the line in plausibility with this match. I wish I had a recording for you. |
Martin0 Brancaleone
Maphia Clan Corporation CRONOS.
301
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
I once got 3000 wp. i was squad leader in a team with 3 logi and 1 heavy.
We got 8000+ wp and 3 (or 4) OB.
We just moved as a group and revived / repaired / resupplied each other when needed.
It was awesome.
EDIT: all this before uprising, so 4 man teams and no "assault" logi suit. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills. |
Moronic Farce
Goonfeet
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
578
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
People have clearly misunderstood what the OP said - these guys did not do well in any manner whatsoever (by the sounds of things). If they didn't get many kills, hacks or installation destructions, the only thing that could have been getting them WP is uplinks and nanohives. If they nearly ran out of clones, then that's ~150 potential spawns at 25WP each. If each person stands on a nanohive and shoots until they get resupplied, that's another 10WP (+20% for the player and squad leader), I can see those sort of numbers being plausible. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
268
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills.
I find this very hard to believe.... they hold only ONE objective for 3 minutes ? Something doesn't add on... do you have any evidence that you team lost the match.. ? Like a screenshot or something ?
Sorry... but you sound a bit like a Troll.
|
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:People have clearly misunderstood what the OP said - these guys did not do well in any manner whatsoever (by the sounds of things). If they didn't get many kills, hacks or installation destructions, the only thing that could have been getting them WP is uplinks and nanohives. If they nearly ran out of clones, then that's ~150 potential spawns at 25WP each. If each person stands on a nanohive and shoots until they get resupplied, that's another 10WP (+20% for the player and squad leader), I can see those sort of numbers being plausible.
Thank you for helping clarify for me. That is was I am saying, as I said, the 3rd guy on the list was the one laying down most the drop uplinks. I know this because we killed everyone in the area of the most drop uplink spawns that match, including the guy who was dropping them. Meaning he was not one of the 2 who did not die at all. The fact that they were in the tank was deduced from the fact that the only thing we know we did not kill was that and it was there the whole match and we know it killed roughly that number when we were raiding that nest where the guy the was spamming his drop uplinks on "E". Just look at the numbers for both sides. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills. I find this very hard to believe.... they hold only ONE objective for 3 minutes ? Something doesn't add on... do you have any evidence that you team lost the match.. ? Like a screenshot or something ? Sorry... but you sound a bit like a Troll.
We won the match. Please look at the 2 screenshots I posted in the op. |
|
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
268
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills. I find this very hard to believe.... they hold only ONE objective for 3 minutes ? Something doesn't add on... do you have any evidence that you team lost the match.. ? Like a screenshot or something ? Sorry... but you sound a bit like a Troll. We won the match. Please look at the 2 screenshots I posted in the op.
Right sorry... you talking about WP exploit ?... Nothing new. The same way that you K/D ratio exploits, by snipers and tanks. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:Django Quik wrote:People have clearly misunderstood what the OP said - these guys did not do well in any manner whatsoever (by the sounds of things). If they didn't get many kills, hacks or installation destructions, the only thing that could have been getting them WP is uplinks and nanohives. If they nearly ran out of clones, then that's ~150 potential spawns at 25WP each. If each person stands on a nanohive and shoots until they get resupplied, that's another 10WP (+20% for the player and squad leader), I can see those sort of numbers being plausible. Thank you for helping clarify for me. That is was I am saying, as I said, the 3rd guy on the list was the one laying down most the drop uplinks. I know this because we killed everyone in the area of the most drop uplink spawns that match, including the guy who was dropping them. Meaning he was not one of the 2 who did not die at all. The fact that they were in the tank was deduced from the fact that the only thing we know we did not kill was that and it was there the whole match and we know it killed roughly that number when we were raiding that nest where the guy the was spamming his drop uplinks on "E". Just look at the numbers for both sides. Could they have had uplinks in the MCC or behind the tank or somewhere where most of the team could have been spawning in? |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Moronic Farce wrote:So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer.
I second this but was trying to be more polite in my assertions.
Somewhere in the OP's post there is a misunderstanding on his part or a misrepresentation of the facts. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Skilfer wrote:Django Quik wrote:People have clearly misunderstood what the OP said - these guys did not do well in any manner whatsoever (by the sounds of things). If they didn't get many kills, hacks or installation destructions, the only thing that could have been getting them WP is uplinks and nanohives. If they nearly ran out of clones, then that's ~150 potential spawns at 25WP each. If each person stands on a nanohive and shoots until they get resupplied, that's another 10WP (+20% for the player and squad leader), I can see those sort of numbers being plausible. Thank you for helping clarify for me. That is was I am saying, as I said, the 3rd guy on the list was the one laying down most the drop uplinks. I know this because we killed everyone in the area of the most drop uplink spawns that match, including the guy who was dropping them. Meaning he was not one of the 2 who did not die at all. The fact that they were in the tank was deduced from the fact that the only thing we know we did not kill was that and it was there the whole match and we know it killed roughly that number when we were raiding that nest where the guy the was spamming his drop uplinks on "E". Just look at the numbers for both sides. Could they have had uplinks in the MCC or behind the tank or somewhere where most of the team could have been spawning in?
They would have had to consistently spawn on that one guy's uplinks to get that number, which they very obviously were not as was made clear with the situation at "E". Even if they were farming WP, I find that it would have been extremely difficult for them to have pulled off the 2332. With how poorly the team was doing, he could not have been in the action and getting those WP without dying at least once.
** I would like to note that we did ask them afterwards how they managed it because as I said, we were dumbfounded. They refused to reply. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Moronic Farce wrote:So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer. I second this but was trying to be more polite in my assertions. Somewhere in the OP's post there is a misunderstanding on his part or a misrepresentation of the facts.
We did a lot of analysis and review afterwards because none of us could figure it out. We were crunching numbers too to see if he cold have been farming. That is why it seems like I was doing so much at once. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 09:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Moronic Farce wrote:So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer. I second this but was trying to be more polite in my assertions. Somewhere in the OP's post there is a misunderstanding on his part or a misrepresentation of the facts. We did a lot of analysis and review afterwards because none of us could figure it out. We were crunching numbers too to see if he cold have been farming. That is why it seems like I was doing so much at once.
Uh huh.
Can you link me to the security camera footage? Or the Instant replay button? |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
579
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:00:00 -
[17] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills. I find this very hard to believe.... they hold only ONE objective for 3 minutes ? Something doesn't add on... do you have any evidence that you team lost the match.. ? Like a screenshot or something ? Sorry... but you sound a bit like a Troll. We won the match. Please look at the 2 screenshots I posted in the op. Right sorry... you talking about WP exploit ?... Nothing new. The same way that you K/D ratio exploits, by snipers and tanks. This is pretty baffling even knowing the current WP exploits that exist - 7 kills each is 350WP x 2 = 700WP. If they're both in the tank, each one gets 35WP more for the assist, so that's another 245WP x 2 = 490WP. With a squad order on the tank that's 20% extra 1190WP x 1.2 = 1428WP.
That means between them they earnt over 2000WP in some other way without getting any hacks or installation kills. The only way I can see it being possible is that they got ~70 spawns on uplinks, which would theoretically be possible without either of them dying or restocking at a supply depot if one of them was a logi with all equipment slots filled by uplinks. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:03:00 -
[18] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Moronic Farce wrote:So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer. I second this but was trying to be more polite in my assertions. Somewhere in the OP's post there is a misunderstanding on his part or a misrepresentation of the facts. We did a lot of analysis and review afterwards because none of us could figure it out. We were crunching numbers too to see if he cold have been farming. That is why it seems like I was doing so much at once. Uh huh. Can you link me to the security camera footage? Or the Instant replay button?
As I said, I wish I had it recorded. Any person on that leaderboard can verify how the match went down through if you really are skeptical of the facts I have presented. It is not all that hard to piece together who was doing the big roles in a match based on the leaderboards though. Well-fit tanks and good snipers generally die a lot less if at all for example. |
Moronic Farce
Goonfeet
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:04:00 -
[19] - Quote
Or the guy missed a bunch of stuff and after the match tried to piece together everything he had.
Probably more likely is all I'm saying. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
269
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:05:00 -
[20] - Quote
A defend order in the tank, plus repair tools constantly on on it, could mount for the majority of that WP's.. also do you check if the Tank was a Command Center, where people could Re-spawn on it ? that could add more WP... maybe few resupply drops, and up-links too ?
Is plenty of ways to exploit WP's .... |
|
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:06:00 -
[21] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Skilfer wrote:Getting the number isn't the question here. It is how they managed to do so while being destroyed. They held 1 objective for no more than 3 minutes and that was the end of them holding any objectives, they had almost no clones left when their MCC blew up, and you can look at the K/D for yourself. All of our installations were intact as well. The individuals in question sat in a tank in the red line, didn't blow up anything and only got 7 kills. I find this very hard to believe.... they hold only ONE objective for 3 minutes ? Something doesn't add on... do you have any evidence that you team lost the match.. ? Like a screenshot or something ? Sorry... but you sound a bit like a Troll. We won the match. Please look at the 2 screenshots I posted in the op. Right sorry... you talking about WP exploit ?... Nothing new. The same way that you K/D ratio exploits, by snipers and tanks. This is pretty baffling even knowing the current WP exploits that exist - 7 kills each is 350WP x 2 = 700WP. If they're both in the tank, each one gets 35WP more for the assist, so that's another 245WP x 2 = 490WP. With a squad order on the tank that's 20% extra 1190WP x 1.2 = 1428WP. That means between them they earnt over 2000WP in some other way without getting any hacks or installation kills. The only way I can see it being possible is that they got ~70 spawns on uplinks, which would theoretically be possible without either of them dying or restocking at a supply depot if one of them was a logi with all equipment slots filled by uplinks.
Exactly, that is the same reaction we had, and this is about the only method we came up with as well which while possible seems incredibly improbable. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:A defend order in the tank, plus repair tools constantly on on it, could mount for the majority of that WP's.. also do you check if the Tank was a Command Center, where people could Re-spawn on it ? that could add more WP... maybe few resupply drops, and up-links too ?
Is plenty of ways to exploit WP's ....
The people were spawning on the uplinks above "E" for the entire final quarter of the match, not the tank. And even with all of that, they would not have had the 2332. Maybe if the people were spawning on the tank, but they were not. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Moronic Farce wrote:So while your team dominated the game you did nothing but watch these guys, take note of what they were doing, analyzed what each member of their squad did, and topped the leader board as well?
You certainly are a talented man Mr.Skilfer. I second this but was trying to be more polite in my assertions. Somewhere in the OP's post there is a misunderstanding on his part or a misrepresentation of the facts. We did a lot of analysis and review afterwards because none of us could figure it out. We were crunching numbers too to see if he cold have been farming. That is why it seems like I was doing so much at once. Uh huh. Can you link me to the security camera footage? Or the Instant replay button? As I said, I wish I had it recorded. Any person on that leaderboard can verify how the match went down through if you really are skeptical of the facts I have presented. It is not all that hard to piece together who was doing the big roles in a match based on the leaderboards though. Well-fit tanks and good snipers generally die a lot less if at all for example.
Listen. From your title one can come in to this post and already make a fairly accurate assumption that you're a dramatic and emotional person.
There's nothing wrong with this. Most women are like this so you'll either relate well to them and do well in the dating scene or your a normal, emotionally health, woman.
All of that being said, your post is riddled with holes and provides little supporting facts. It sounds as if you're trying to defend something you know may be hard to swallow.
The majority of your posts are coming from the stance that assume "you" were watching exactly what these guys were doing, which I suspect was put together with here say from your other young friends and an already biased mindset of 'these guys must be hacking because they got more wp and we own'.
Next time, if you would like to be taken seriously with these types of allegations you'll need to provide more then second hand anecdotal evidence about what the other team was doing to earn these totals.
Being on a losing team doesn't mean you can't rake in the WP. In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
581
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:A defend order in the tank, plus repair tools constantly on on it, could mount for the majority of that WP's.. also do you check if the Tank was a Command Center, where people could Re-spawn on it ? that could add more WP... maybe few resupply drops, and up-links too ?
Is plenty of ways to exploit WP's .... You don't get WP for repairing tanks or for people spawning on a tank CRU. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:16:00 -
[25] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:
In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning.
This is the point I am getting at. I do not believe they were hacking or cheating. I figured they must have been farming it, but with how the match went down and without endangering themselves as well, I find it hard making the numbers add up to one person getting 2332 WP within reasonable means. Here is the map we were on. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:
In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning.
This is the point I am getting at. I do not believe they were hacking or cheating. I figured they must have been farming it, but with how the match went down and without endangering themselves as well, I find it hard making the numbers add up to one person getting 2332 WP within reasonable means. Here is the map we were on.
So if you don't believe they were hacking or cheating what is it you're having a tough time with?
Do you think CCP's math is wrong?
I am still having trouble understanding what you want. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
581
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Listen. From your title one can come in to this post and already make a fairly accurate assumption that you're a dramatic and emotional person.
There's nothing wrong with this. Most women are like this so you'll either relate well to them and do well in the dating scene or your a normal, emotionally health, woman.
All of that being said, your post is riddled with holes and provides little supporting facts. All we have here is continuous claims with new "evidence" rebutting the aforementioned claims. It sounds as if you're trying to defend something you know may be hard to swallow. The majority of your posts are coming from the stance that assume "you" were watching exactly what these guys were doing, which I suspect was put together with here say from your other young friends and an already biased mindset of 'these guys must be hacking because they got more wp and we own'.
Next time, if you would like to be taken seriously with these types of allegations you'll need to provide more then second hand anecdotal evidence about what the other team was doing to earn these totals.
Being on a losing team doesn't mean you can't rake in the WP. In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning.
I never got the impression from the OP that he's accusing anyone of hacking or cheating - he just seems genuinely confused, as most people would be, and is trying to figure out how this could have been accomplished. Instead of being asinine and rude, why don't you try to be helpful and offer some sort of actual explanation more specific than you can get lots of WP and still lose. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Listen. From your title one can come in to this post and already make a fairly accurate assumption that you're a dramatic and emotional person.
There's nothing wrong with this. Most women are like this so you'll either relate well to them and do well in the dating scene or your a normal, emotionally health, woman.
All of that being said, your post is riddled with holes and provides little supporting facts. All we have here is continuous claims with new "evidence" rebutting the aforementioned claims. It sounds as if you're trying to defend something you know may be hard to swallow. The majority of your posts are coming from the stance that assume "you" were watching exactly what these guys were doing, which I suspect was put together with here say from your other young friends and an already biased mindset of 'these guys must be hacking because they got more wp and we own'.
Next time, if you would like to be taken seriously with these types of allegations you'll need to provide more then second hand anecdotal evidence about what the other team was doing to earn these totals.
Being on a losing team doesn't mean you can't rake in the WP. In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning. I never got the impression from the OP that he's accusing anyone of hacking or cheating - he just seems genuinely confused, as most people would be, and is trying to figure out how this could have been accomplished. Instead of being asinine and rude, why don't you try to be helpful and offer some sort of actual explanation more specific than you can get lots of WP and still lose.
I did, in my first post, but he's absolutely sure there's absolutely no way he ever took his eyes off of anyone in the squad so that they could have done that. Absolutely. Sure. Positively. Absolutely.
|
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:
In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning.
This is the point I am getting at. I do not believe they were hacking or cheating. I figured they must have been farming it, but with how the match went down and without endangering themselves as well, I find it hard making the numbers add up to one person getting 2332 WP within reasonable means. Here is the map we were on. So if you don't believe they were hacking or cheating what is it you're having a tough time with? Do you think CCP's math is wrong? I am still having trouble understanding what you want.
Numbers, math. I am trying to figure out a reasonable way to accumulate those numbers under the given circumstances. I believe they found a way that does not require one to completely detract themselves from the match itself, but what that is, is what I am trying to determine. |
Flamesea
Shadow Company HQ
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Maby there was a sniper or two next to that tank and he got out to revive them.. thats nice extra wp for you. |
|
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:23:00 -
[31] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Listen. From your title one can come in to this post and already make a fairly accurate assumption that you're a dramatic and emotional person.
There's nothing wrong with this. Most women are like this so you'll either relate well to them and do well in the dating scene or your a normal, emotionally health, woman.
All of that being said, your post is riddled with holes and provides little supporting facts. All we have here is continuous claims with new "evidence" rebutting the aforementioned claims. It sounds as if you're trying to defend something you know may be hard to swallow. The majority of your posts are coming from the stance that assume "you" were watching exactly what these guys were doing, which I suspect was put together with here say from your other young friends and an already biased mindset of 'these guys must be hacking because they got more wp and we own'.
Next time, if you would like to be taken seriously with these types of allegations you'll need to provide more then second hand anecdotal evidence about what the other team was doing to earn these totals.
Being on a losing team doesn't mean you can't rake in the WP. In fact, you can focus so much on raking in the WP that it becomes counter productive to winning. I never got the impression from the OP that he's accusing anyone of hacking or cheating - he just seems genuinely confused, as most people would be, and is trying to figure out how this could have been accomplished. Instead of being asinine and rude, why don't you try to be helpful and offer some sort of actual explanation more specific than you can get lots of WP and still lose. I did, in my first post, but he's absolutely sure there's absolutely no way he ever took his eyes off of anyone in the squad so that they could have done that. Absolutely. Sure. Positively. Absolutely.
The individuals that were in the front doing the stuff you originally purposed died at least once. These two (the first being the prime individual in question) did not. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
269
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:25:00 -
[32] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:A defend order in the tank, plus repair tools constantly on on it, could mount for the majority of that WP's.. also do you check if the Tank was a Command Center, where people could Re-spawn on it ? that could add more WP... maybe few resupply drops, and up-links too ?
Is plenty of ways to exploit WP's .... You don't get WP for repairing tanks or for people spawning on a tank CRU.
Don't you ?... that shows how much i know about WP exploits......
What about scanners ? |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:25:00 -
[33] - Quote
What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the hole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:27:00 -
[34] - Quote
Flamesea wrote:Maby there was a sniper or two next to that tank and he got out to revive them.. thats nice extra wp for you.
We were killing the guys at "E" in G17 on the map. The enemy tank was located at the top of E17. If there was a sniper he would not have been there long enough to have granted enough WP to make sense of this. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Django Quik wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:A defend order in the tank, plus repair tools constantly on on it, could mount for the majority of that WP's.. also do you check if the Tank was a Command Center, where people could Re-spawn on it ? that could add more WP... maybe few resupply drops, and up-links too ?
Is plenty of ways to exploit WP's .... You don't get WP for repairing tanks or for people spawning on a tank CRU. Don't you ?... that shows how much i know about WP exploits...... What about scanners ?
To my knowledge scanners still do not give WP |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
581
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. Please go and get over 1500WP on top of anything you could get from kills without dying and then explain how it's crying wolf for anyone to be confused by the accomplishment. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf.
lol, just because you are not observant during a match and cannot recollect a chain of events does not mean we all are so inept. I am looking for people to help me crunch numbers to make sense of the situation. I have restated this fact several times now. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:34:00 -
[38] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. Please go and get over 1500WP on top of anything you could get from kills without dying and then explain how it's crying wolf for anyone to be confused by the accomplishment.
Done.
Someones gotta be the grown up in the room and tell the kids story time is over and it's bed time. Sorry if that makes me the 'bad guy'. |
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. lol, just because you are not observant during a match and cannot recollect a chain of events does not mean we all are so inept. I am looking for people to help me crunch numbers to make sense of the situation. I have restated this fact several times now.
Crunch what numbers homie!?
You haven't told us anything.
You remember everything they weren't doing but remember nothing of what they were. They must be hacking! |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:38:00 -
[40] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. lol, just because you are not observant during a match and cannot recollect a chain of events does not mean we all are so inept. I am looking for people to help me crunch numbers to make sense of the situation. I have restated this fact several times now. Crunch what numbers homie!? You haven't told us anything. You remember everything they weren't doing but remember nothing of what they were. They must be hacking!
WP are numbers. They are added up and calculated. The process of adding up and calculating numerical values from other numerical values is often referred to as "crunching numbers." |
|
GLiMPSE X
Gigolos of the Interwebz
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:43:00 -
[41] - Quote
Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. lol, just because you are not observant during a match and cannot recollect a chain of events does not mean we all are so inept. I am looking for people to help me crunch numbers to make sense of the situation. I have restated this fact several times now. Crunch what numbers homie!? You haven't told us anything. You remember everything they weren't doing but remember nothing of what they were. They must be hacking! WP are numbers. They are added up and calculated. The process of adding up and calculating numerical values from other numerical values is often referred to as "crunching numbers."
Typically, when you are 'crunching numbers' you have the numbers given to you as a data set and you 'crunch' those into your 'sum'
Your number crunching is looking for someone to give you the data set that equals your sum. The problem is, no one else was there to log this 'data set'
You've got a memory like an iron trap so surely you've got a strong enough imagination to come with some numbers to crunch to get your sum. |
SGT Garrisson
On The Brink CRONOS.
66
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:47:00 -
[42] - Quote
did u take in to account kill assists ?
25 wp each and u said it was a missile tank if they got and assist on all ur team members as i can see u have some losses might be woth adding those up
ive had 46 assists in one match 25 x 46 = 1150 wp |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Skilfer wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. lol, just because you are not observant during a match and cannot recollect a chain of events does not mean we all are so inept. I am looking for people to help me crunch numbers to make sense of the situation. I have restated this fact several times now. Crunch what numbers homie!? You haven't told us anything. You remember everything they weren't doing but remember nothing of what they were. They must be hacking! WP are numbers. They are added up and calculated. The process of adding up and calculating numerical values from other numerical values is often referred to as "crunching numbers." Typically, when you are 'crunching numbers' you have the numbers given to you as a data set and you 'crunch' those into your 'sum' Your number crunching is looking for someone to give you the data set that equals your sum. The problem is, no one else was there to log this 'data set' You've got a memory like an iron trap so surely you've got a strong enough imagination to come with some numbers to crunch to get your sum. I suspect they must be hacking because there's no way you could be wrong about what they were doing the whole match. It's the only thing that makes sense. It must be true!
Total Kills = 7 WP/KIll = 60 WP (assuming +10 Squad order bonus) Squad Order Bonus/Kill = 10 WP Squad Order Bonus/Assist = ~2-5 WP Revive = 60 WP etc...
Numbers such as those. I am looking for people, such as yourself if you think you are capable, to come up with some numbers that would add up to the 2332 WP total in the situation I have described. Before trying to create an entirely different scenario, work with the one I have given and see if you come to the same conclusion. If that is true, then we revise. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
SGT Garrisson wrote:did u take in to account kill assists ?
25 wp each and u said it was a missile tank if they got and assist on all ur team members as i can see u have some losses might be woth adding those up
ive had 46 assists in one match 25 x 46 = 1150 wp
Check their kill count. I considered this at first, but he would need the a kill assist for every other kill in his whole team to come close to that number. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t Orion Empire
581
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:55:00 -
[45] - Quote
GLiMPSE X wrote:Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. Please go and get over 1500WP on top of anything you could get from kills without dying and then explain how it's crying wolf for anyone to be confused by the accomplishment. Done. Someones gotta be the grown up in the room and tell the kids story time is over and it's bed time. Sorry if that makes me the 'bad guy'. Done? Really? Okay, then please explain how and we'll lay this to rest. |
Skilfer
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 10:59:00 -
[46] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:Django Quik wrote:GLiMPSE X wrote:What he's not telling you is that he payed 0 attention to them and didnt notice the totals until after the match. Where he and his 5 buddies in squad chat started to have convenient, absolute, memory recollection about what the other team was doing the whole match, he then comes to the forums and proceeds to sucker you into his 'story'.
I have little patience for children crying wolf. Please go and get over 1500WP on top of anything you could get from kills without dying and then explain how it's crying wolf for anyone to be confused by the accomplishment. Done. Someones gotta be the grown up in the room and tell the kids story time is over and it's bed time. Sorry if that makes me the 'bad guy'. Done? Really? Okay, then please explain how and we'll lay this to rest.
He doesn't understand what I'm looking for. Whether it be because everyone here is so used to troll threads, or something else, I don't know, but it honestly isn't worth either of our time, and if he does not believe this thread is worth anything, I have trouble understanding what legitimate reason he would have to continue posting on it and bumping it. |
Porterian
Nova Corps Marines Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 16:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Okay I've had a general read of the of this thread due to interest in what people might have to say.
thank you for everyone's input it helped me put together a better picture of what happened. I have a fairly good idea on how this WP accumulation may have arose. but I still find myself puzzled due to a few simple factors that I noticed in match about the 2 main men.
I still query these numbers due to these simple factors.
1. Time spent in LAV (40%~ of match) 2. Only a logi and a scout suit was used. (I know, I saw them) (logi driving, Scout gunning) 3. Number of drop links on the field exceeds carrying amount even for 2 people 4. Only one orbital strike was used and obtained a max of 3-5 kills (end of match) 5. Only 3/4 successful hacks where made by the apposing team (not all necessarily performed by them) (cant be proven) 6. Not many hacks where made on turrets/depots 7. 7 kills
now I've gone over my points and looked at all options and this is my personal conclusions and confusions
1. time spent in LAV could of been used in transporting the player around the map to: -drop uplinks, nano hives gain kill assist bonuses i doubt that any revives where made within the beginning due to the distance from action that was spent driving around.
2. unless they where running back and forwards to the depot to resupply on drop up links they would of still only be limited to 4 to the pair. compared to the 10-15 that i can say where on the field and there is a time limit on each of the drop up links (alot of running backwards and forwards) so there wouldn't be many WP gained from re-spawn
3. we know that there wasn't and reviving within the pair of them due to 0 deaths so we can presume there was a couple of revives made but to my knowledge you can only gain WP once per clone per revive so again this limits WP on multi-revives
4. only 1 orbital with max 5 kills 250 WP max there
5. lets say one did get at 2 objectives with squad coms on them 240WP
6. ok the only reasonable explanation i have hacking is that they used the LAV to take northern and western turrets and the turrets an CRU at "Obj D" that's 450WP
7. 7 death is just plain simple 420 guessing there was SC.
This still leaves 990 WP uncounted for
so this leaves me questioning the likely-hood of gaining this may war points from healing, kill assists, re-spawns and resupply. that's over 40 (with 25WP~ earned each time) of these events happening within the match and what could be called a short match at that. very unlikely considering the majority of kill boards top 1000WP in a thrashing by the winning teams top player. still just makes me question its authenticity. it either that or these guys are good harvesters
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |