|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
155
   |
Posted - 2013.05.23 08:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Elrick Mercer wrote:Wow this is a first blame it on the reviewer for saying a bad game is bad!
You fan boys really need to take the blinders off. Everything he said is true the battles are not fun shooting is bland.
These are things that we've been saying about Dust for over a year now and then when it releases you thought people would say hey it has potential in 10 years Dust will be fantastic! WTF is gonna wait for 10 years?
The only thing that this reviewer has a good point on are the lack of game modes and the lack of eve/Dust interaction. Beyond that, he's an idiot. |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
156
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 08:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:Elrick Mercer wrote:Wow this is a first blame it on the reviewer for saying a bad game is bad!
You fan boys really need to take the blinders off. Everything he said is true the battles are not fun shooting is bland.
These are things that we've been saying about Dust for over a year now and then when it releases you thought people would say hey it has potential in 10 years Dust will be fantastic! WTF is gonna wait for 10 years? The only thing that this reviewer has a good point on are the lack of game modes and the lack of eve/Dust interaction. Beyond that, he's an idiot. Care to describe HOW he is a idiot?
The entire review is a blatantly obvious comparison to COD and the rest, with the reviewer not judging it on it's own merits.
Now, if the reviewer had done a shred of research and known the future plans of this game from CCP and mentioned that in his video, his score might be fair for what is in the game already.
But no, he doesn't. He judges it in a comparison to Battlefield and COD and the like, and even goes as far as saying that dropsuits don't matter, when anyone with any intelligence can tell you that heavy versus scout are both completely different ballgames.
He's obviously a fool, and should not have reviewed the game. |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
160
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 18:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:Elrick Mercer wrote:Wow this is a first blame it on the reviewer for saying a bad game is bad!
You fan boys really need to take the blinders off. Everything he said is true the battles are not fun shooting is bland.
These are things that we've been saying about Dust for over a year now and then when it releases you thought people would say hey it has potential in 10 years Dust will be fantastic! WTF is gonna wait for 10 years? The only thing that this reviewer has a good point on are the lack of game modes and the lack of eve/Dust interaction. Beyond that, he's an idiot. Care to describe HOW he is a idiot? The entire review is a blatantly obvious comparison to COD and the rest, with the reviewer not judging it on it's own merits. Now, if the reviewer had done a shred of research and known the future plans of this game from CCP and mentioned that in his video, his score might be fair for what is in the game already. But no, he doesn't. He judges it in a comparison to Battlefield and COD and the like, and even goes as far as saying that dropsuits don't matter, when anyone with any intelligence can tell you that heavy versus scout are both completely different ballgames. He's obviously a fool, and should not have reviewed the game. Reviews have NOTHING to do with future plans of a game. All those other chicken poop reviews you been watching where they go on praising the "potential" of this game are irrelevant in a review. The whole purpose of a review is to show the audience what the game has to offer RIGHT NOW. NOT what it has possibilities to offer in the future. I felt the guy was dead on accurate with his review for Uprising514. I don't think he was constantly comparing it to COD he threw in a little joke this isn't about KDR and getting diamond guns. Not once did I hear him say this works much better in COD.
You need to learn to read between the lines when people speak.
As it is, his score would be fair if he actually played it for more than a day. I'm well aware this game has issues.... but half that review is outright lies.
|
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
161
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 23:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arramakaian Eka wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:You need to learn to read between the lines when people speak.
As it is, his score would be fair if he actually played it for more than a day. I'm well aware this game has issues.... but half that review is outright lies.
Main complaints were perfectly valid. Dust is a poor FPS, there's no way around it. And it will justly be judged as an FPS. If the FPS mechanics don't improve - like us FPS players have been demanding and giving them feedback for close to a year -, Dust will die slowly.
If you can't admit this reviewer has no idea what he's talking about, did not do research, and lied numerous times.... we have nothing to discuss; as you are obviously a trolling hater looking for any excuse to trash Dust. |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
161
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 00:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Arramakaian Eka wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:Arramakaian Eka wrote:Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:You need to learn to read between the lines when people speak.
As it is, his score would be fair if he actually played it for more than a day. I'm well aware this game has issues.... but half that review is outright lies.
Main complaints were perfectly valid. Dust is a poor FPS, there's no way around it. And it will justly be judged as an FPS. If the FPS mechanics don't improve - like us FPS players have been demanding and giving them feedback for close to a year -, Dust will die slowly. If you can't admit this reviewer has no idea what he's talking about, did not do research, and lied numerous times.... we have nothing to discuss; as you are obviously a trolling hater looking for any excuse to trash Dust. Zyrus Amalomyn: active on forums since January. Roughly 300 posts, 161 likes = half a like per post. Arramakaian Eka: active on forums since August. Roughly 600 posts, 555 likes = almost one like per post. Nice try.
So you resort to Ad Hominems instead of proving me wrong.
Awesome stuff. |
|
|
| |
|