|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
   |
Posted - 2013.05.22 19:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
I rarely use a GLU-tac. I mostly rock nova knives, flaylocks, and subby's lately. sometimes a shotty. People just jumped on the bandwagon. It's no big deal. digital weapons are digitally lethal.
It's kind of annoying when people play a war game and get killed by war weapons. might i suggest angry birds? OR tetris? |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 19:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:mollerz wrote:I rarely use a GLU-tac. I mostly rock nova knives, flaylocks, and subby's lately. sometimes a shotty. People just jumped on the bandwagon. It's no big deal. digital weapons are digitally lethal.
It's kind of annoying when people play a war game and get killed by war weapons and complain about it. do you even knwo what kind of game you are paying? What do you expect? might i suggest angry birds? OR tetris? Its called balance, its a vital part of these war games you seem to know little about.
lololol. It's not balance you seek. It's bland vanilla wins where you get to dictate your enemy and their equipment that you seek.
let's not delude ourselves, shall we? I nova knife, shotgun blast, and sub machine gun Tac users every single battle. I have no problem with people using the weapon of their choice.
So what's your excuse?
And please, let's not try to hide behind the balance excuse. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 19:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:mollerz wrote:Jin Robot wrote:mollerz wrote:I rarely use a GLU-tac. I mostly rock nova knives, flaylocks, and subby's lately. sometimes a shotty. People just jumped on the bandwagon. It's no big deal. digital weapons are digitally lethal.
It's kind of annoying when people play a war game and get killed by war weapons and complain about it. do you even knwo what kind of game you are paying? What do you expect? might i suggest angry birds? OR tetris? Its called balance, its a vital part of these war games you seem to know little about. lololol. It's not balance you seek. It's bland vanilla wins where you get to dictate your enemy and their equipment that you seek. let's not delude ourselves, shall we? I nova knife, shotgun blast, and sub machine gun Tac users every single battle. I have no problem with people using the weapon of their choice. So what's your excuse? And please, let's not try to hide behind the balance excuse. you are delusional, its unbalanced.
You suck at this game so I am delusional  
Okay. whatever keeps you coming back.
|
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 20:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:
My argument= a valid argument about the importance of balance in a fps.
Your argument= name calling and nonsense.
Name calling? Surely you jest. It's dishonest to say I called you any names, but you know- it is a common tactic for someone who made no points to say they did and throw in a BS I get to stay above making said point because you called me a name.
but you see, I didn't. So let's go back to the fact you never made a point or an argument.
The word balance is not an argument or a point. The way you say it, it's merely an opinion. But please, don't let me segue you out of your mock poutrage. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 20:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:mollerz wrote:Jin Robot wrote:mollerz wrote:I rarely use a GLU-tac. I mostly rock nova knives, flaylocks, and subby's lately. sometimes a shotty. People just jumped on the bandwagon. It's no big deal. digital weapons are digitally lethal.
It's kind of annoying when people play a war game and get killed by war weapons and complain about it. do you even knwo what kind of game you are paying? What do you expect? might i suggest angry birds? OR tetris? Its called balance, its a vital part of these war games you seem to know little about. lololol. It's not balance you seek. It's bland vanilla wins where you get to dictate your enemy and their equipment that you seek. let's not delude ourselves, shall we? I nova knife, shotgun blast, and sub machine gun Tac users every single battle. I have no problem with people using the weapon of their choice. So what's your excuse? And please, let's not try to hide behind the balance excuse. And you do all that on short range maps...on every single long range map you're completely useless against TARs. I love knives and short range weapons too, but to claim you own in every single game against TARs is a ridiculous lie.
Long range maps? I bust out my LAV. I do a lot of sneaking around.
Well.. I don't own, but I am routinely in the top 4 spots. I routinely get at least ten kills. Many many assists, and I die a lot sometimes as well... to TACs to tanks. to mass drivers. pretty much everything a player a kills me with ;)
There is not a balance issue. Just a desire to control the weapons your enemy uses because it is apparently such a good counter to the way you stubbornly play it means you play to get owned.
um.. lol.. adapt or die much? Which one? |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 20:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:
It's about versatility...and in that respect no other weapon even comes close. A TAR is waaaaaay more effective at various ranges than anything else. Every single other weapon has some drawback (SR overheats and has less range, LR is crap up close, mass driver has less range AND a non-direct flight path, sniper rifles are crap up close, shotgun is only usable up close) but the TAR doesn't. Tell me, what's the drawback of using a TAR other than it not fitting your play style?
When it comes to pure effectiveness and versatility, nothing beats it.
I'm not saying all other weapons suck, I'm saying they simply aren't as good as TARs for k/d ratios. I get good results with knives/flaylocks too, but compared to a TAR user it's playing the game on hard mode while he gets to play on easy mode.
Spec into TARs and then compare it to your puny little shotgun in terms of effectiveness ;)
I've spec'd into AR enough to use the GLU-Tac here and there. It is pretty boss. Like before chromosome.
However, I just don't have as much fun with the play style it dictates. I use weapons that suit my play style and as a result have more fun. And that is probably the reason I do well enough most times. Of course, if your play style is owned by a particular play style or weapon that is popular, your fun is going to go down and your performance along with it.
The topics we should be talking about are lag, the stickiness of objects and terrain, etc. These are major problems above and beyond small balance issues.
|
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
276
|
Posted - 2013.05.22 21:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Fair enough :) There are always going to be power players. Their play style is going to be focused on the numbers. They can't do anything else. So if it is not TARs it will be Proto lasers, or whatever. I also kind of see all these topics as a bit disingenuous and self serving. If that weapon kills you, in the least, use it to kill them back. Better yet, use your play style to kill them is more like it. That's where you'll be the most effective. so ninja, LAV blapping, etc. One way I dominate is with a turret. Get me in a rail turret, and I also have a lot of fun. It OHKs TAR users too.
FWIW, I always run over the logi in any group with my BPO LAV. I also knife them first.
It doesn't always work out, but when it does.. I am sure I had a better time either way ;) |
|
|
| |
|