As I've posted in other threads, a kick button completely negates any vision that CCP has for in-game griefing/spying/betraying. For example, they have stated their views that in the future, hopefully you can be offered a contract mid-game to turn against your employers. This could be at a key point, e.g. capping a point, or using Skyfire battery.

A kick button completely negates that feature. Why, you ask? Oh so simple. The commander gives an order, that soldier refuses to carry out said order, and is kicked immediately. Another soldier walks over and uses it instead. All that happens is a minor delay in what happens, rather than "oh **** we're screwed because we didn't ensure that our soldiers are loyal enough".

I can agree that the current mechanics are not viable long term, and the best solution would be to grant roles that allow said player into PC. This controls who enters the match, but doesn't impact on the saboteur capabilities of anyone who decides to sabotage the match. This path still needs for the saboteur/spy to gain the confidence of the directors or CEOs, but doesn't need any artificial methods such as creating a holding corp.

This is all correct, People complaining that EVE players have more control over Jenzaers are mistaken. And spies are actually useful in EVE and not useful at all in Dust.

We need more features to improve the abilities of spies and Awoxers/Jenzaers rather then limiting them.

Yea boo hoo, you can screw up one match and cost a corp like 100M. So what.

HAHA, but really. The damage an AWOXer can inflict is minimal, as time goes by it will mostly be used to try and cause a corp to lose a district. It will be to difficult to try and figure out who will attack your district and infiltrate them in advance. And anyways the defending corp will probably have a store of clones by then and probably won't even lose the district even if they lose the battle due to AWOXING.

The threat is minimal.