So you want an easy ride, yes? I am ok with some dirty little secrets you want to keep. But it is strange you want to keep others from telling them out loud.

If you can't keep your secrets yourself and get catched red handed you deserve to be ratted on

A lot of us know that, as well as that its coming to Dust being an inevitability. I don't think it unreasonable to raise priority .

So, now that we've established your lack-of-point as completely inane, let's get back to allowing the Dust-only players that can't figure out how to talk to EVE players to see corp history, thus decimaring yet another of their meritless excuses for eliminating meta entirely and turning this into Call of Halo with added Carebear sauce.

EDIT:
And those packs are not pay to win. They're equivalent ot standard-level gear. Suck less.

And why is this corp accepting the nobody with no corp history, no SP, etc., and then letting him in on the corp fights on top of it?

I get that you're a Call of Halo kid, so these are foreign concepts to you, but basic screening techniques and standards will catch what you're describing almost every time, even without corp history and API access (though it's helpful to have).

Do it! It's legitimate gameplay! Seriously. All we're talking about here is providing the basic tools for basic screening. A skilled spy can still get in and cause damage, if he's good and works at it. What we're talking about are the basic tools that mitigate just how easy it is right now. Most of the whinging is from two camps: the carebears that want complete immunity, and those that simply don't screen or find it too much work. You can't help the failtards that want it removed entirely, but they'll eventually quit anyway and we'll be better off for it (a common truism in EVE is that every time WoW player quits eve to go back to WoW, the average IQ of both games improved; gotta love math humor ). For the others, offering more of the basic tools diminishes their already-meritless arguments, by making it easier to screen for obvious spais, and thus placing the blame more solidly on their own laziness and poor recruiting standards and practices.

Honestly, thanks to this last post of yours, you remind me of my sister: arguing for the sole sake of argument itself. You know there's no real or legitimate reason to argue against the OP, you're just arguing to do it, the very definition of trolling.

I guess I should just say kudos to you for displaying the fact that we should disregard everything you've said in this thread, since it's pure trolling.