Rei Shepard
Spectre II
272
   |
Posted - 2013.05.21 09:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:So these are very simular weapons, both doing simular amounts of damage, rate of fire and "clip" size.
If you really wanna, you can have a tank cannon in your hands. Choose your tank cannon and slap on the correct amount of damage mods, you have a blaster. The only diffrence is you can fit your Duvolle in tight spaces
The diffrence is that you can one shot infantry, but Tac infantry can only scratch your paint.
I can see why Infantry whines about it, i don't get why tankers need to whine about it ?
|
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
273
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 09:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Rei Shepard wrote:Quote:So these are very simular weapons, both doing simular amounts of damage, rate of fire and "clip" size.
If you really wanna, you can have a tank cannon in your hands. Choose your tank cannon and slap on the correct amount of damage mods, you have a blaster. The only diffrence is you can fit your Duvolle in tight spaces The diffrence is that you can one shot infantry, but Tac infantry can only scratch your paint. I can see why Infantry whines about it, i don't get why tankers need to whine about it ? Tanks do not need to whine about it, it does like 7% efficiency rate against vehicals lol like you said its all about infaintry
Then i dont see why you need to vs use the tank gun caliber damage to use in your post, they use the same metrics in damage applied, but one of them cant shoot at oranges, only apples.
And while i agree the TAC needs to be balanced, comparing it to a tank turret is not the way to go. |
Rei Shepard
Spectre II
273
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 10:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Rei Shepard wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Rei Shepard wrote:Quote:So these are very simular weapons, both doing simular amounts of damage, rate of fire and "clip" size.
If you really wanna, you can have a tank cannon in your hands. Choose your tank cannon and slap on the correct amount of damage mods, you have a blaster. The only diffrence is you can fit your Duvolle in tight spaces The diffrence is that you can one shot infantry, but Tac infantry can only scratch your paint. I can see why Infantry whines about it, i don't get why tankers need to whine about it ? Tanks do not need to whine about it, it does like 7% efficiency rate against vehicals lol like you said its all about infaintry Then i dont see why you need to vs use the tank gun caliber damage to use in your post, they use the same metrics in damage applied, but one of them cant shoot at oranges, only apples. And while i agree the TAC needs to be balanced, comparing it to a tank turret is not the way to go. It certianly is the way to go, it clearly can do as much damage as a proto tank turrent. Its not an AV weapon so it will not kill tanks like a tank blaster will but it certainly preforms simularly to kill infaintry. I did not say it is exactly as effective as a tank blaster turrent but the facts are there and tons of ppl know how it works in game. If you like, i can spec an alt into proto assult with cpu enhancers damage mod D TAC and post up a video on how badly i would destroy in PC and pubs?
Maybe, but i have yet to get one shot from a Tac, where ive been one shot multiple times from tank turrets.
Ive played with the TAC myself and have 1m sp into blaster AR, with 1 level in SS but i have a fully maxed out SCR tree, i kill allot more each time i pick up the TAC regardless of terrain.
And while i can one shot a good deal of people with the charge shot on the SCR and get 2-3 headshots a match, the extra scope zoom on the tac makes each game 5-8 headshot kills.
Quickscope & Dragshots are the main source of kills with it, ive tried 3 damage mods, but never thought the gun needed more damage.
Like i said, it needs to be toned down, i am not sure how, if you lower its ROF to say 400 it won't change anything, change damage down and it might not be usefull anymore.
Less Range & a bit more recoil but then again, we all know recoil means nothing in the hands of someone who can shoot properly.
But it is definatly not inline with the Imperial Scrambler, thats for sure.
|