|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1062
   |
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
I knew the whole AR line out DPSes every weapon in the game, but this is kind of excessive. That damn thing needs to be nerfed. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1063
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 07:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:The funny/worst part is, we've had absolutely 0 acknowledgement from CCP re: the TAC. No 'Working as inteded', no 'Broken weapon, we know', no 'We've got higher priorities'.. Nothing.
That's what stings the most. If they had plans to fix it, they should say it. Don't get me wrong - Dust DEV's Best Devs - but it seems that the actual devs of the game are the ones making the posts. No department dedicated to the forums. So if the devs are busy(which im about 100% sure they are), they cant really interact with us forum trolls.
It's a vicious cycle. :( CPMs fault.
More like CCP's fault for adding that 10% damage bonus to the only weapon class in the game that didn't take a severe nerf in uprising. The TAR and the other ARs were perfectly fine before the increase, but look at them now. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1065
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 08:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Repe Susi wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:To make a real life comparison, it's like saying that a .50 (what the large blaster represents) is the same as a .556 (what assault rifles are). CCP, you NEED to nerf this thing. If you're nerfing tanks bc we kill too many people, then this thing needs a double nerf bc NO tank can cause the amount of pain this can bc it can go ANYWHERE. What I don't understand is why CCP does not tone TAC's down (dmg/rof/range) bit by bit, finding balance that way? Why all so HUGE changes which lead to inevitable imbalance?
Trying to appeal to the CoD/BF crowd? |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1065
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 09:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
SERPENT-Adamapple wrote:Cosgar wrote:Repe Susi wrote:CharCharOdell wrote:To make a real life comparison, it's like saying that a .50 (what the large blaster represents) is the same as a .556 (what assault rifles are). CCP, you NEED to nerf this thing. If you're nerfing tanks bc we kill too many people, then this thing needs a double nerf bc NO tank can cause the amount of pain this can bc it can go ANYWHERE. What I don't understand is why CCP does not tone TAC's down (dmg/rof/range) bit by bit, finding balance that way? Why all so HUGE changes which lead to inevitable imbalance? Trying to appeal to the CoD/BF crowd? Another moron that thinks those games have 1 weapon in the game almost everyone uses, when in actuality those games have weapon variety. It's this community CCP is appealing to, not any other that cried buff, nerf, buff. Players from "COD/BF" that are coming in droves are seeing the imbalance.
Don't be silly, CoD/BF players care more about racking up kills than balance. That's why the TAR will probably never be touched, let alone the entire AR line. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1065
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 09:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
SERPENT-Adamapple wrote:Your being silly if you think any of those 2 games have 1 weapon 90% of the community uses. I stated those gamed have balance in their weapons. Who gives a **** what they care about. Don't try to derail the points I'm trying to make. It just makes you look more dum.
Riiight, like 90% of the people in CoD don't use SMGs...
Only person looking silly is you. I made a smart ass comment and you got all butthurt. You on Activision's payroll or something? |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1065
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 09:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
ITT: People that probably used Viziams last build blatantly ignoring facts. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1065
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 10:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Hate to be the bearer of bad news Exmaple Core, but tank turrets just got ninja nerfed. I hope you don't have to redo your math because of this. |
|
|
| |
|