|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
EoN.
308
   |
Posted - 2013.05.21 13:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Ironwolf, both of your examples suck you know.
In example 1 it's sad for Timmy, but in that case he should find a better corp for him since that CEO (or director or whoever that kicked him) is just dumb. If a corp doesn't have a CEO and directors that can manage the kick function properly they don't deserve to be in charge of anything. I don't see how this is a problem.
In example 2 you argue that once a player have been giving the ability to kick people from the match it's a problem that he can actually make use of that to sabotage the match? Like really? The corp shouldn't have given him the ability then. I don't see how this is a problem.
agreed in both scenarios all you QQers can feel free to use your 'HTFU' catch phrase. The tools are in place to remove the saboteur(s) from the match. The fact that Timmy and uncle Gus cant operate the 'kick' button properly isn't anyone fault except maybe Aunt Bunny  |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
EoN.
308
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
holy f@ck really? this is yet another example of inability of some people to understand the simple fact that console gamers are NOT PC GAMERS!
Us console players want to do just that... play. Not sit in the corner and play 'spin the bottle' with our e-friends cause we have no idea what day it is, much less if we need sunscreen to just walk upstairs out of the basement.
Sure spies can sabotage a match to an extent, but once discovered there should be no reason that player(s) be prevented from being removed from the match.
believe it or not.. we console gamers want to kill the opposition, work as a team to WIN. not CHEAT... which in its simplest form is all this bullsh1t is.
Nova, try acting like someone that is in a position that represents others... your thoughts mean NOTHING. YOUR job is to represent your constituents and provide a platform for US, the players of this game, to iron things out for YOU to then take to CCP and mesh out details.
a CPM member should have NO personal agenda, which you clearly do.
rough week for CPM lol... just lost faith in another one. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
EoN.
308
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 14:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sorry about the bad examples but here is where I see kick function being at
It will be the same as refunding isk a disgruntled director stole from the corp.
honestly I don't see that. We've already seen corps being disbanded and wallets looted from spies or whatever u wanna call them getting a trusted position allowing them access. It has happened a few times already and you know what? there has never been a call for CCP for 'fix' a broken mechanic. As the result every time ultimately was bad judgement of the CEO to make so and so a director.
this action sabotages the corporation and sets them back... no one yells for the devs to give them a way to stop it, cause everything is already in place to prevent it, aside from the wildcard of people being human.
now you are messing with actual gameplay, and us real gamers don't like that being messed with other than devs working to improve mechanics, otherwise we just move on to the next shooter and so forth until we find one that feels good in the palms of our hands.
the kick function provides control to keep the whole sabotage role out of actual gameplay, which is how it should be |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
EoN.
308
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
so explain how requiring a password would prevent TKers?
im done talking to stooped over here...
you wanna argue a 'kick' function causes other issues with someone's self esteem or all kinds of meta-game hoopla that only keyboard kowboys care about just gtfo.
seriously.. if you're a good spy and get promoted where u can do this, then it just takes your AWOXing to a whole new level, BUT at the end of it you only have yourself to blame....
so sad how some people try to overanalyze such an easily resolved scenario |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
EoN.
308
|
Posted - 2013.05.21 16:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:so explain how requiring a password would prevent TKers?
im done talking to stoopid over here...
you wanna argue a 'kick' function causes other issues with someone's self esteem or all kinds of meta-game hoopla that only keyboard kowboys care about just gtfo.
seriously.. if you're a good spy and get promoted where u can do this, then it just takes your AWOXing to a whole new level, BUT at the end of it you only have yourself to blame....
so sad how some people try to overanalyze such an easily resolved scenario Basically you setup a password and only share it with your trusted squad leads or fighters and they can get in, everyone else will be locked out unless you have a turn coat. But at least players have to earn the trust to earn that password.
ok after thinking about it I can see the argument, but still is just 1 more reason to sugar coat this...
this whole discussion is about impacting actual gameplay, not meta-game, not silly forum hijinx.. the match played on the battlefield.
There may be a place for this in EVE, but in a console shooter there simply isn't...
kick function solves all problems, and if someone in power is the spy, well there's the compromise for the 'welcome to new eden htfu' pansies out there |
|
|
| |
|