This is in no way against the rules, and is in fact actively encouraged. Welcome to New Eden, this ain't CoD or Battlefield.

It's not very difficult to infiltrate a corp in EVE. Have you ever heard of chainsmoking? That's pretty much what is going on here.

Should the corp doing the recruiting not be looking into who it is they are recruiting?

A battle won by minimal effort and minimal skill is a most efficiently won battle.

You have the tools to filter players into your corp without injecting them straight into front line roles. Don't pretend like you aren't bringing it on yourself by just fronting "newberries" straight into a PC match if you are already aware of the potential for strife that they can cause.

People defending a broken mechanic? SMFH. Saying welcome to new eden and this is how it is in eve?

I thought in EVE you can kick people from the fleet?

So directors and CEO's must not have the power to kick people from a battle? or better yet, SELECT WHO HE WANTS TO FIGHT IN THE BATTLE?

Nah, that sounds too logical to work right? Yea, HTFU. CEO's is in charge of an entire army, but can't kick people from battle. Yeah that makes perfect sense.

There are plenty of real fights. But if someone is beating you without having to fight, then kudos to them. If you're gonna quit over it, go ahead. Just means more spoils for the rest of us. Perhaps, instead of whining about "no real fights", you can start thinking of how to force your enemies into a "real fight" so you can put your "ub3r-1337-gunskillz" to use.

Seriously, not less than 24 hours ago, I saw someone complaining on these forums that the roles all the units have are useless unless they are forced into direct conflict in this game, because there is nothing but "shoot the enemy". Now I've got someone complaining that there is a mechanic available where you can win without firing a shot....

MAKE UP YOUR MINDZ!! ffs

No, but that's not really it, the real problem is that you're losing and you can't think of how to win, so you want CCP to change the game to your benefit. We've got pubbies like you in EVE too. We also have suicide ganking to deal with them. And that's why friendly fire needs to be available in EVERY match.

HAHA!! You tears, tey are lovely. Your assumption that I am in a sov alliance, also, brilliant. Rage more, silly twit, and please, keep breaking the forum language rules so you get bantears as well.

CCP invested money made from EVE, but EVE has no investment from DUST, so if DUST goes down, it's very unlikely it will drag EVE with it. It's also very unlikely that DUST will go down based on your assumption that people will find this kind of intrigue boring, or the assumption that this kind of gameplay will somehow result in the absolute be-all and end-all death of all fighting in DUST. It won't, because people who are enjoying the game are learning how to counter the methods used, while people who have either already decided it's crap or can't think for themselves are whining about it on the forums instead of playing.

Now, I do plenty of fighting, in both EVE and DUST. I currently have little to no stake in PC, but we're still sussing out the different allegiances, and waiting for a few to turn up, to see what's going on when the dust settles (no pun intended). We're just kind of biding our time for the moment, enjoying the simpler aspects of the game. Anyway, point is, before you start making assumptions about UDHI, you should really try to learn something about us first.

Also, I would recommend refraining from such angry language on the forums. It will get you all banned up outta here.