| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saucy Butt Love
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
Interstellar Murder of Crows
13
   |
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why is it in 2009 the gameplay looked so much better. :/ now release day 4 years later it's nothing you said it was going to be.
You said 10 vehicle classes 8 for release we have 3. You showed the doors opening and closing with elevators to other rooms we have one room in merc quarters and one in the war room. Gameplay showed much better maps and better hacking computers. It's like a whole new game that yes has been improved in terms of It probably more stable, but you can't take away things like 8vehicles and only putting in 3. Thanking away the roaming areas which is what makes every game feel like an MMO.
Look CCP your game is awesome but you look back at 2009 and wonder what happend. I love what dust it now but can't stop realising you could have simply made it so much better with a few things. Prone, the other vehicles, the wepon attachments. I don't think you were ready to release the game as full release. I think you rushed to get it out on the 5/14 date, and if that honestly is the only reason why it's called 514 then that's stupid.
I want you to know I love the game and love playing it but am honestly a little sad about not having the things we used to see in 2009. |
Ulysses Knapse
DUST University
Ivy League
376
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dust 514 from 2009 is a different engine with the same concept. PS3 couldn't handle it. |
slypie11
Planetary Response Organisation
292
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:Dust 514 from 2009 is a different engine with the same concept. PS3 couldn't handle it.
but it had so many cool features like vehicles, attachments, moving and pilotable MCCs, installation drops, and Skirmish 1.0. Why did CCP have to remove all the cool features just to bring them back in 3 years? |
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe
Planetary Response Organisation
321
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
It was also a prototype demo. It wouldn't have been playable in any real sense. You might as well be asking why the trailers look better than the current gameplay. |
Princeps Marcellus
Expert Intervention
Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 21:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe wrote:It was also a prototype demo. It wouldn't have been playable in any real sense. You might as well be asking why the trailers look better than the current gameplay.
I'd word it this way: that I'm disappointed in the fact that the proof of concept didn't turn out to be as good as promised. They had so many wonderful concepts and ideas and such, but it didn't work out so well on release. |
Azri Sarum
DUST University
Ivy League
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.19 22:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Princeps Marcellus wrote:Alan-Ibn-Xuan Al-Alasabe wrote:It was also a prototype demo. It wouldn't have been playable in any real sense. You might as well be asking why the trailers look better than the current gameplay. I'd word it this way: that I'm disappointed in the fact that the proof of concept didn't turn out to be as good as promised. They had so many wonderful concepts and ideas and such, but it didn't work out so well on release.
You're acting like now that the game is released its done. Its only just beginning. |
Shady IceCream Truck
Silent Stalkerz
Hephaestus Forge Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 02:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
beginning of the end imo |
Draxus Prime
BurgezzE.T.F
Orion Empire
572
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 02:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shady IceCream Truck wrote:beginning of the end imo
when eve first came out alot of ppl said the same thing
eve has grown into the largest mmo experiance ever,when eve was first out there were 3 types of ships and now there r undreds
ccp dont stop adding stuf
all of what ccp is today started by them making a boardgame to earn enough to start making eve |
David Spd
Isuuaya Tactical
Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 02:31:00 -
[9] - Quote
Developing for console is highly restrictive unlike developing for PC. They had/have unrealistic goals and needed to tone stuff down so it would work on the hardware. |
Shady IceCream Truck
Silent Stalkerz
Hephaestus Forge Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 02:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:Shady IceCream Truck wrote:beginning of the end imo when eve first came out alot of ppl said the same thing eve has grown into the largest mmo experiance ever,when eve was first out there were 3 types of ships and now there r undreds ccp dont stop adding stuf all of what ccp is today started by them making a boardgame to earn enough to start making eve
isnt Eve in SPACE?
doesnt seem hard to balance a couple space ships Pew pewing each other.. |
|
|
David Spd
Isuuaya Tactical
Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.05.20 02:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
Draxus Prime wrote:Shady IceCream Truck wrote:beginning of the end imo when eve first came out alot of ppl said the same thing eve has grown into the largest mmo experiance ever,when eve was first out there were 3 types of ships and now there r undreds ccp dont stop adding stuf all of what ccp is today started by them making a boardgame to earn enough to start making eve
Eve is on a platform that can grow as much as it needs to. PC hardware is always improving and new tech allows them to do more.
PS3 is dated hardware that is only going to improve with a new console. CCP has to develope within thelimitations of PS3' hardware. That's all there is to it. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |