DUST Search - DUST514 6/10 Desctructiod review

All Channels

General Discussions

DUST514 6/10 Desctructiod review

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
xprotoman23 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1487	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:29:00 - [1] - Quote http://www.destructoid.com/review-dust-514-253697.phtml Some of the review is BS but they make some fairly valid points.
Polish Hammer Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy 431	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:34:00 - [2] - Quote Okay.
Nstomper The Sangheli 419	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:36:00 - [3] - Quote Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews
Vallud Eadesso Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 153	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:37:00 - [4] - Quote xprotoman23 wrote: http://www.destructoid.com/review-dust-514-253697.phtml Some of the review is BS but they make some fairly valid points. Before I say anything else, Destructoid PRIDE themselves on a true 1 to 10 scale. That means they have 5 as an average, not a 7 like most websites. It's a mostly fair review except I don't understand his beef with the marketplace. From what I can tell, it's obvious the Aurum items only reduce wait time, and offer to advantage. I'm not sure where his P2W thing comes from but I agree with the rest of it. Score seems about right too.
Beta Dust Fish Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 31	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:37:00 - [5] - Quote only valid point they should make is that Dust514 is really still in Beta with poor organization from CCP themselves
slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation 281	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:38:00 - [6] - Quote while some points were valid, the whole Aurum pay to win and "over saturation" thing were complete BS. Maybe if he played it longer...
Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens 150	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:38:00 - [7] - Quote My favorite movie is A Clockwork Orange. I don't care if everyone else hates that movie; I adore it. I did not like Firefly. I don't think anyone feels slighted by that. Be well.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1375	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:38:00 - [8] - Quote Nstomper wrote: Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews Le problem is the percentage that isn't here who might read said review i.e. new players. Though I hope they're at least smart enough to try the game out for themselves and not just take the word of some reviewer
Malkai Inos The Vanguardians Orion Empire 74	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:44:00 - [9] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: Nstomper wrote: Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews Le problem is the percentage that isn't here who might read said review i.e. new players. Though I hope they're at least smart enough to try the game out for themselves and not just take the word of some reviewer Meh reviews or not, people keep dripping into the game as we speak. I'm just curious how many of them will stay.
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 2340	Posted - 2013.05.17 23:56:00 - [10] - Quote Not a bad review. Although I think the author needs to do a little more research on the aurum items before he passes judgment on them.

Natu Nobilis BetaMax Beta CRONOS. 288	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:18:00 - [11] - Quote "Dust 514 has promises of greatness. It reaches high and attempts to accomplish something not many games have even tried to this day, which should be commended. But right now, it needs a few more major updates before it gets there." That-¦s the spirit.
Green Living Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 228	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:19:00 - [12] - Quote LOL DIDN"T WATCH
Vrain Matari ZionTCD Unclaimed. 527	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:23:00 - [13] - Quote I thought it was pretty fair. For a guy who says he plays EVE he seems to have a lot of trouble understanding the market, though.
Jason Pearson Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 1154	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:34:00 - [14] - Quote Joseph Ridgeson wrote: I did not like Firefly. I don't think anyone feels slighted by that. I hope you get kicked into its engine.
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 2340	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:40:00 - [15] - Quote Vrain Matari wrote: I thought it was pretty fair. For a guy who says he plays EVE he seems to have a lot of trouble understanding the market, though. Now that you mention it, it does have me a little irked that he doesn't seem to grasp the market in Eve, which will obviously translate into DUST in the future.
copy left SyNergy Gaming EoN. 186	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:41:00 - [16] - Quote I hope this post lights a fire in CCP's hind-quarters. This game needs a bit more to make it feel like a true AAA contender. Right now its at AA status. Its addicting to those who put the work in, and the game as a whole is fun. Now it just needs more polish and features to make it shine. A tutorial for new players wouldnt hurt at all.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3901	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:44:00 - [17] - Quote The game modes right now are generic, simple, boring, and lacking variety. Essentially only TDM, and point-capture; the rest is just variations of those 2. It's inexcusable to launch a multiplayer only shooter with only 2 boring modes (bring back Skirmish 1.0 ASAP), and its inexcusable to launch an MMO without PVE.
Icy Xenosmilus Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 276	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:48:00 - [18] - Quote Exactly, Game Modes make or break a game, with the **** generic ones we have now, it's funner just messing around in corp chat than playing the game.
crazy space 1 Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 1194	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:49:00 - [19] - Quote Bingo score, unfinished game, but not a bad game. Thank god it didn't get the score eve online did at release.... 3/10 >.> Come on dust , grow up. also skirmish 1.0 make the clone cost the cost for an MCC, that can be the battle for when you invade with a clone pack. BINGO BRILLIANT. That's why the attackers have a disavtage, it doesn't need to be balanced, the defender gets an unfair advantage ON PURPOSE> bring it back ccp ;_;
Jason Pearson Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 1155	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:50:00 - [20] - Quote Actually read it and the guy seems like a mug, Complains about single use vehicles, complains about Aurum stuff being p2w. He had a few points but completely dropped the ball in the last bit. Then I checked the comments, the guys who are like "Waaah Micro transactions and having to pay for each item repeatedly is a non-starter for me". Do we really need them? Scrubs like that aren't worth having around, I mean, I never understood reviews on a F2P game and people reading it and never bothering to try the f2p game itself. It's completely free to try, why take the word of someone who's played it a bit and probably doesn't understand most of it? Sighs

Icy Xenosmilus Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 281	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:52:00 - [21] - Quote Jason Pearson wrote: Actually read it and the guy seems like a mug, Complains about single use vehicles, complains about Aurum stuff being p2w. He had a few points but completely dropped the ball in the last bit. Then I checked the comments, the guys who are like "Waaah Micro transactions and having to pay for each item repeatedly is a non-starter for me". Do we really need them? Scrubs like that aren't worth having around, I mean, I never understood reviews on a F2P game and people reading it and never bothering to try the f2p game itself. It's completely free to try, why take the word of someone who's played it a bit and probably doesn't understand most of it? Sighs Comments are just stupid, reviewer just seems clueless.
Cody Sietz The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION 116	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:58:00 - [22] - Quote Nstomper wrote: Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews I do. If people don't play, sony could drop support for the game.
Moejoe Omnipotent Imperfects Negative-Feedback 393	Posted - 2013.05.18 02:05:00 - [23] - Quote Icy Xenosmilus wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Actually read it and the guy seems like a mug, Complains about single use vehicles, complains about Aurum stuff being p2w. He had a few points but completely dropped the ball in the last bit. Then I checked the comments, the guys who are like "Waaah Micro transactions and having to pay for each item repeatedly is a non-starter for me". Do we really need them? Scrubs like that aren't worth having around, I mean, I never understood reviews on a F2P game and people reading it and never bothering to try the f2p game itself. It's completely free to try, why take the word of someone who's played it a bit and probably doesn't understand most of it? Sighs Comments are just stupid, reviewer just seems clueless. Denial "The problem isn't the game, it's the player!" Denial
Icy Xenosmilus Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 284	Posted - 2013.05.18 02:25:00 - [24] - Quote Moejoe Omnipotent wrote: Icy Xenosmilus wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Actually read it and the guy seems like a mug, Complains about single use vehicles, complains about Aurum stuff being p2w. He had a few points but completely dropped the ball in the last bit. Then I checked the comments, the guys who are like "Waaah Micro transactions and having to pay for each item repeatedly is a non-starter for me". Do we really need them? Scrubs like that aren't worth having around, I mean, I never understood reviews on a F2P game and people reading it and never bothering to try the f2p game itself. It's completely free to try, why take the word of someone who's played it a bit and probably doesn't understand most of it? Sighs Comments are just stupid, reviewer just seems clueless. Denial "The problem isn't the game, it's the player!" Denial You realize I recognize that the game is bad right now? Doesn't change the fact that the reviewer is clueless as are the comments.
Bungholio Cornholio Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State 14	Posted - 2013.05.18 02:53:00 - [25] - Quote Nstomper wrote: Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews I'm sure a large percentage of the Fanboys say exactly this because of the average reviews from every site.
bolsh lee Ahrendee Mercenaries 151	Posted - 2013.05.18 03:44:00 - [26] - Quote I find it funny and deserving how reviewers are calling CCP out on their bullshit and they dont even know it... CCP promised so much with Uprising and provided very little, because the massive amounts of server/game stability issues, etc... I could list them but the majority of us fanboys that stalk the forum are awaiting fixes for the majority of stuff that wasn't broken pre-uprising.. Being that the majority of console players have a few months attention span lets hope the free2play and free updates brings players in or keeps them coming back because these reviewers are tearing it up...
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. CRONOS. 1561	Posted - 2013.05.18 03:47:00 - [27] - Quote xprotoman23 wrote: http://www.destructoid.com/review-dust-514-253697.phtml Some of the review is BS but they make some fairly valid points. So, I'm curious what the point of these threads is? I mean, if you're doing this to make sure we know about reviews when they happen, then that's fine, I guess. I mean, most of us are perfectly capable of Googling Dust 514 now and then to check for new reviews.
Moejoe Omnipotent Imperfects Negative-Feedback 402	Posted - 2013.05.18 04:03:00 - [28] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: xprotoman23 wrote: http://www.destructoid.com/review-dust-514-253697.phtml Some of the review is BS but they make some fairly valid points. So, I'm curious what the point of these threads is? I mean, if you're doing this to make sure we know about reviews when they happen, then that's fine, I guess. I mean, most of us are perfectly capable of Googling Dust 514 now and then to check for new reviews. You would say the same thing if this was a 10/10 review, right?
Chunky Munkey Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 463	Posted - 2013.05.18 07:41:00 - [29] - Quote Nstomper wrote: Im sure only a small percentage here including you care about reviews We should all care about reviews. The future of this game depends on it being populated. So while our own day-to-day impression of the game isn't going to change just because IGN said this, or Kotaku said that, their reviews hold a large influence over how many new players this game can attract.
Llan Heindell One-Armed Bandits Unclaimed. 129	Posted - 2013.05.18 07:49:00 - [30] - Quote Vallud Eadesso wrote: xprotoman23 wrote: http://www.destructoid.com/review-dust-514-253697.phtml Some of the review is BS but they make some fairly valid points. Before I say anything else, Destructoid PRIDE themselves on a true 1 to 10 scale. That means they have 5 as an average, not a 7 like most websites. It's a mostly fair review except I don't understand his beef with the marketplace. From what I can tell, it's obvious the Aurum items only reduce wait time, and offer no advantage. I'm not sure where his P2W thing comes from but I agree with the rest of it. Score seems about right too. I suppose they made their Review through IGN. lol Llan Heindell.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.