DUST Search - up pc battle count

All Channels

General Discussions

up pc battle count

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 13	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:16:00 - [1] - Quote ccp you should up the number of players on each side from 16 to 18 with the addition of 6 man squads so we can have a full 3 squads instead of 2 6 man squads and 1 four man squad
Vethosis BetaMax Beta CRONOS. 39	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:19:00 - [2] - Quote BRILLIANT CAN'T BELIEVE NO ONE ELSE THOUGHT OF THIS.. PURE BRILLIANT. +1
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 16	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:40:00 - [3] - Quote Vethosis wrote: BRILLIANT CAN'T BELIEVE NO ONE ELSE THOUGHT OF THIS.. PURE BRILLIANT. +1 i am amazed i had to suggest this. seems t me it should have been a given when they upped the six man squads
Rolf The Viking Ill Omens EoN. 12	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:45:00 - [4] - Quote More lag sounds delightful.

CCP Nullarbor C C P C C P Alliance 1178	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:46:00 - [5] - Quote CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on.

ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 17	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:49:00 - [6] - Quote well you should def think about it its really irritating running in pc with 2 full squads and 1 2/3 squad lolz ..good work on fixing tank aiming gracie
crazy space 1 Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 1171	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:52:00 - [7] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. Listen then you need to make squads 4 man again untill you make up your mind Or do the smart thing, make 8 man squads dooooooo iiiiiiiiiiiiittttttt
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 17	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:53:00 - [8] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. goood work dev nullharbor i like ya your the only one ive seen who actively answer my question xD makes me have hope in dust and that it may be a truly balanceed and epic game. maybe dust will fullfill the potential i saw in it over a year ago YAY
Maken Tosch DUST University Ivy League 2312	Posted - 2013.05.17 00:55:00 - [9] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math Oh my god. Are you actually serious? Quick, how many hamsters are running your servers?
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 17	Posted - 2013.05.17 01:00:00 - [10] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math Oh my god. Are you actually serious? Quick, how many hamsters are running your server? lol

The dark cloud Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 1434	Posted - 2013.05.17 01:33:00 - [11] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math Oh my god. Are you actually serious? Quick, how many hamsters are running your server? Appearently not enough otherwise people wouldnt have issues to log in, download new patches or other stuff that prevents them from playing.
Jayquan18 The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 76	Posted - 2013.05.17 02:00:00 - [12] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. What happen to the 48 players at launch?
BASSMEANT ZionTCD Unclaimed. 241	Posted - 2013.05.17 02:04:00 - [13] - Quote fix the laaaag first. Peace B
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy 982	Posted - 2013.05.17 02:15:00 - [14] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. There is not enough +1 for the win of this idea. A verity of district/team sizes would be quite a fun additional aspect to the match play and the macro tactics of PC. 0.02 ISK Cross
OgTheEnigma Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 118	Posted - 2013.05.17 02:53:00 - [15] - Quote I'm definitely interested in seeing variable district sizes in the future. Low value micro districts of 8vs8, or even 6vs6, would go a long way to making PC more accessible to smaller corps. On the flip side there would be extra large districts of 24vs24 or more for the big corporations to battle it out over. At a base level I imagine district value and rewards would be dictated by clone generation; larger battle districts would naturally produce more clones and therefore ISK. Other district bonuses would of course scale as well, such as the EVE side PI bonuses.
Talruum Tezztarozza Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS. 124	Posted - 2013.05.17 02:59:00 - [16] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC CCP Nullarbor wrote: Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. Damn we should come up with new abbreviation for Planetary Conquest. Everytime I read sentence like these I go what? what? Dust for PC ??
Mobius Wyvern BetaMax. CRONOS. 1557	Posted - 2013.05.17 03:13:00 - [17] - Quote Talruum Tezztarozza wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC CCP Nullarbor wrote: Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. Damn we should come up with new abbreviation for Planetary Conquest. Everytime I read sentence like these I go what? what? Dust for PC ?? >Suggesting Dust on PC wouldn't kill the PS community completely.
Deluxe Edition TeamPlayers EoN. 195	Posted - 2013.05.17 03:22:00 - [18] - Quote The frame rate is terrible with 16 players... if anything lower the count to 12 v 12
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 64	Posted - 2013.05.24 11:46:00 - [19] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. sounds like a plan ...would push smaller corps to taking smaller districts and the larger corps will most likely bicker over the planets that offer more epic battles
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 64	Posted - 2013.05.24 11:46:00 - [20] - Quote Deluxe Edition wrote: The frame rate is terrible with 16 players... if anything lower the count to 12 v 12 maybe ur frame rate not mine.

Joseph Ridgeson WarRavens 174	Posted - 2013.05.24 12:15:00 - [21] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. Listen then you need to make squads 4 man again untill you make up your mind Wait, why do Squads have to be smaller because 16 is not evenly divisible by 6? Would be like saying "My truck's back seats are uncomfortable so we end up taking more cars when the whole gang goes out to eat. Please rip out my seats."
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries 1307	Posted - 2013.05.24 12:49:00 - [22] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. 15 likes and no suggestion of when we will be getting 24v24 battles? What is "may increase this in the future"?? You guys declaresd 24v24 battles @ launch at the minimum!! Plus, smaller corps will be fine since you've implemented a mechanic to use/abuse ringer. A 5 man corp can grab a district if they have friends.
EnIgMa99 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 355	Posted - 2013.05.24 12:51:00 - [23] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. dude everyone needs to be visible at all times, and frame rate needs to come first. i could care less about more players or shadows or light flares. junk needs to be stable and IT NEEDS TO RENDER EVERYONE!
ImpureMort Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic 64	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:00:00 - [24] - Quote EnIgMa99 wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. dude everyone needs to be visible at all times, and frame rate needs to come first. i could care less about more players or shadows or light flares. junk needs to be stable and IT NEEDS TO RENDER EVERYONE! i love how you cant tell if that proto is your enemy or friend until they are shooting you though lol

CCP FoxFour C C P C C P Alliance 4023	Posted - 2013.05.24 13:29:00 - [25] - Quote NULLARBOR! Stop making us look bad. We are perfectly capable of doing food math. :/

Infine Sentinel Better Hide R Die D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 47	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:03:00 - [26] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: NULLARBOR! Stop making us look bad. We are perfectly capable of doing food math. :/ You will have you're true name Sox.
Zatara Rought Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz 157	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:03:00 - [27] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. This would mitigate some of the chore of pc if you knew you only needed 8 guys to be on.
m621 zma Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 28	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:20:00 - [28] - Quote Ugh, for those suggesting we go back to 8 vs 8 just FOAD!
Maximus Stryker Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 484	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:32:00 - [29] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. Listen then you need to make squads 4 man again untill you make up your mind Or do the smart thing, make 8 man squads dooooooo iiiiiiiiiiiiittttttt 16/4=4 You can have four 4man squads if you want to...I do not believe you are limited to only squad 0, squad 1 and squad 2...
Delirium Inferno Edoras Corporation 406	Posted - 2013.05.24 14:36:00 - [30] - Quote CCP Nullarbor wrote: CCP = bad at math 16 is currently our maximum player limit per team for all battles. We may increase this in the future however specifically for PC this increases the minimum requirements for smaller corporations which is an important consideration. We have also been discussing the idea of different sized districts that pay out different amounts but then have corresponding team sizes. Would be a cool expansion for PC later on. This is how it should be. Also with an increase in player count it doesn't necessarily raise the minimum requirements for smaller corps. Just work on implementing a better "Mercenary for hire" system so they can fill those extra slots. This would actually work even better since you'd let people who may not have a corporation at all get a chance to experience PC.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.