|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
Orion Empire
472
   |
Posted - 2013.05.14 11:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Yes, please share with the public all your secretz  Harkon Vysarii wrote:Grenadez Rollack wrote:Im just wondering with the launch of planetary conquest what are corps major goals and plans. What is the ideal size for a sucessful corp in PC and are any of the big good corps gonna recruit new members? I dont know but i can say that size wont win you PC unless you can break down your corp into sub Corps and then have hem all reassemble later. May I ask why you say this?
Yeah, this tactic doesn't make sense anymore in any way you try to use it. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
Orion Empire
472
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 11:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Grenadez Rollack wrote:Judging by the current standing who do you think will be the top 3 corps in PC? More likely if the alliances hold then it'll be the top 3 alliances..Most likely Negative Feedback, Hellstorm and co., and EON.
Lol, are you forgetting about Orion and Cronos? They're 2 of the top 3 alliances. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
Orion Empire
472
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 11:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:Yes, please share with the public all your secretz Harkon Vysarii wrote:Grenadez Rollack wrote:Im just wondering with the launch of planetary conquest what are corps major goals and plans. What is the ideal size for a sucessful corp in PC and are any of the big good corps gonna recruit new members? I dont know but i can say that size wont win you PC unless you can break down your corp into sub Corps and then have hem all reassemble later. May I ask why you say this? My personal opinion is that while having large groups of soldiers in one place isnt necessarily a bad thing smaller co dependent groups can operate across multiple fronts. Creating buffer zones of districts initially whereby an alliance/ corp can expand into one specific region of space and make it secure would be my ideal goal, and if that can be effectively achieved quickly and with minimal chances of contact between larger groups right off off the bat more the better.
There's no point in splitting into smaller corps from a big corp to do this - a big corp can just stay a single entity and achieve the exact same thing. One big corp can claim multiple districts across the region from day one, so they wouldn't be restricted to all being in the same place. There is literally zero advantage to splitting into smaller corps for the purposes of expansion. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
Orion Empire
473
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 12:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Harkon Vysarii wrote:But you can only ever deploy X number of men in PC and once per day in offensive utility and x number of times in defense utility. Splitting up a large corps of skilled players to take and establish multiple districts as well as run their neighbours out of their districts they can then reform at anytime with essentially a monopoly over a single planet.
Edit- Things is districts as I understand them are only vulnerable for a certain time period a day, when you have lots of districts you need more people ina single corp to hold them all, but when we are starting out capturing districts is the name of the game. Proxy corps of the main alliance can take and hold terrain then lock down eachothers vulneratble hours and syphon through clones and ISK to the main corp.
Like I said, you don't need to split up to do this. One big corp can just take an entire planet on it's own. You can field 16 players in every battle and every district can have a battle once a day. Say if your big corp has 6 districts, that's 6 battles for 96 players. You could also send out as many attacks as you like everyday too.
There's no need to split into smaller corps at all. A smaller corp also can not just reform into a larger corp with their land and clones too; they'd have to sacrifice themselves and all the money and clones that they've put into the district(s) they were holding. |
|
|
| |
|