|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
800
   |
Posted - 2013.05.13 07:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Like EVE Online Dust 514 is team based game. HTFU! |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
800
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 07:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Otoky wrote:XiBravo wrote:I agree and support a "lone wolf" battle select option as mentioned in other threads. Its supported, you just have to pick a lonewolfe "role" (as I did) like sniper, shotgun, remote explosivs, ninja hack... etc. Edit: sniper hunter ^^
^This!
Though Dust is geared for squads, soloing isn't the absolute option. But, like everything in this game, you have to be fitted for it. You can't just run and gun, you need to dictate the terms on your engagements and find targets that will play to your advantage. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
803
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 07:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
So, let's review OP:
You wrote a QQ dissertation suggesting that tactics should be nerfed. You wrote a sequel suggesting that an important game mechanic to be removed from ambush because you're too lazy to use its effective counter. You made another topic claiming that CCP is catering to M/KB users that got debunked by a dev quote saying the contrary and now you're back to QQing about squads in a game based on teamwork because you refuse to change your tactics accordingly. Keep going, I think you still have a bit more credibility to spare... |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
806
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 08:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Otoky wrote:Maby he just loooove likes 
Catering to the lowest common denominator is the reason why Dust 514 has been ****ed up for the past 2 years. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
813
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 11:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Hmm, seems like I have a little stalker.  It is a compliment you think I am important enough to waste time putting this together and favoriting all my threads  Keep it up 
It's not stalking. Your post history is on display for all to see as is ours. I work as an archivist so it's my nature to cite data. Don't flatter yourself.
As far as your threads go, I disprove of your logic towards watering everything down. You contradicted yourself on several occasions. When your post is devalued, you try to use new players as a crutch to try to win your selfish argument. The latter of which doesn't give new players credit. Devs have mentioned before that they're working on matchmaking for high security systems for rookies, so you can stop using that argument. I think you want this game to be a CoD clone with a placebo spread sheet, and I'll argue to the death on why it shouldn't.
Plus, I. just. don't. like. you. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
814
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 11:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Snaps Tremor wrote:Dengru wrote:anytime someone complains about gameplay people just flood them with a bunch of random scenarios and tactics, 7 out of 10 threads follow this pattern You get why this is such a common cycle though, right? Every time I get one of those kills where you know the other guy is going to be raging about it (LOL SURPRISE SHOTGUN), I imagine them running to the forums and posting a QQ thread about how, because their personal fit did not effectively counter the fit I used to roll them, the game is broken and must be changed to better suit the way they play, no matter how stupidly they play. (And then usually I jump on the forums and find the thread because they really did post it.)
And this is the problem with the game. People like the OP, raging about a core game mechanic that they don't find to their liking and they run crying to the forums. The other "cryhards" QQ in a circlejerk and spam the forums with threads about it until CCP rides in on Sepnir, swinging their Nerf Mjolnir while the people using that game mechanic were only playing the game as intended and specialized in their effective counter, or the said "cryhard" didn't care about things like balance, counter play, or effective counter and wants to be the best at everything without being one of the best in a game of rock paper scissors.
This is why we can't have nice things! |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
814
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 12:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Snaps Tremor wrote:Cosgar wrote:This is why we can't have nice things! After ten years of Eve, CCP are probably quite experienced at ignoring forum tantrums. The real problem is it makes it very difficult to come to any kind of community consensus when valid points are being drowned in a constant stream of people furthering their own half-baked opinion on how the game should play for them.
Seen any cruisers that can beat a battleship lately? |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
815
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 12:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
EnIgMa99 wrote:XiBravo wrote:I agree and support a "lone wolf" battle select option as mentioned in other threads. I wouldn't mind a free for all fire fight game mode
This, I could get behind. Too bad OP wasn't smart enough to come up with it first and was busy being butthurt about being outnumbered in a team based game. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
819
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 12:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Snaps Tremor wrote:Cosgar wrote:Snaps Tremor wrote:Cosgar wrote:This is why we can't have nice things! After ten years of Eve, CCP are probably quite experienced at ignoring forum tantrums. The real problem is it makes it very difficult to come to any kind of community consensus when valid points are being drowned in a constant stream of people furthering their own half-baked opinion on how the game should play for them. Seen any cruisers that can beat a battleship lately? ...yeah! (I don't play Eve and have no idea what that means.)
Flashback to chromosome and replace battleship with heavy and cruiser with assault. |
|
|
| |
|