So....why the hell did you guys suddenly thought tankers need cpu reduction on pg upgrades. We need PG.
I have vehicle engineering on level 5, 621k sp in total. Level 5 was completely unnecessary....

Please stop changing the damn descriptions of stuff without giving us a refund. This is the second time i got punished by YOUR errors CCP. First with the shield extenders and now with the PG.

Please change the skill so it gives +5% pg for every level. We tankers need the PG.

I am a dropship pilot. please please for the love of CCP and all that is dusty also give dropships some hp! 1,491,420 isk to get shot down by 1 shot from a tank?! and forges can 2 shot us. either that or make the dropships more maneuverable because i dont think i can keep up with this....

Exploit?!?!?! If PG was an issue, you should have pulled the pack from the market long ago and reissued it with a different version. The original versions would have been lost via attrition. This bait and switch is not cool, CCP. I bought at least 5 of those Armor Packs over a month ago that are now worthless... Light repper, seriously?!?!?! The AUR tanks are better then the Armor ones... And I can get 66 AUR tanks for what I paid for 40 of the Armor Pack ones.

How long would it take you all to program in 25 WP per spawn on MCRU with some kind of cooldown (like remote reps have) or just straight 10 points per spawn with no cooldown? It's been over a year, and you sit here saying you want more engaging vehicle combat, yet you continuously leave us dropship pilots in the dark.

I love that you're addressing this and being forthcoming with us, but it's getting pretty ridiculous that you just continuously ignore us when even such a tiny simple change like this would help us tremendously.

Oh...and no added survivability to dropships?

O.o

You guys freaking hate us, don't you? That has to be it.

yea i hate that.... sometimes i activate my first hardener just to deactivate it a second later while trying to activate my second one... then i die... thx ccp....

Whoever designed these ships....

Sitting in IRC listening to people tell me dropships are fine is actually infinitely more infuriating than the current state of dropships. I've never rage quit a chat, but I just did. It's always about personal gain with people. "Oh, you knew dropships weren't good, so you're stupid for speccing them". And that is a completely acceptable answer to them, they look at that, and nothing wrong jumps out to them. I went support to SUPPORT, and while I personally can do this thanks to having a large pool of SP and ISK to pull from, new pilots cannot. Basically if you want to be a pilot you have to max out your infantry build first, so that way when you're spending > 50% of the time on ground making ISK to fly your ships, you can actually do descent.

And they want to add Pilot suits? This game is a ******* joke.

CCP Blam, can you at least remove the auto centering of the camera, so you don't have to constantly fight with the ADS to line up a shot?

Assault dropship lol.

<---- He so kitten mad

I thought i saw people using 'ADS' in a non DS context.

that camera is going to give me carpel tunnel.

Free LAVs make the sky a VERY dangerous place to be.

The moment I start shooting at infantry they start spamming LAVs and the sky fills with RDVs. Five or six of those and I am forced to leave the area. They are just too good a form of free AV. The user doesn't have to spend a single SP or ISK, or sacrifice a single CPU or PG point or suit slot to field the most effective anti-DS weapon in the game.

Charge for them and the players may think twice before calling in a half dozen.

Basic you gave standard/MLT Tanks 25% HP bonus but then you took it away by removing the 25% shield and armor bonus. So really this is a net loss. Tanks are still super nerfed, with the incredible low amount of PG Tanks now have.

NTM Turrets still cannot do damage to anything no on the same level as them.

Why was railgun damage nerfd so hard? An Ishukone forge gun has higher DPS than the prototype railguns.

I understand attempting to balance HAV vs HAV combat, but a handheld weapon should not be able to out DPS a large railgun on a HAV. You nerfd HAV's survivability, you nerfd HAV damage, and you just gave forge guns a buff.


edit: can the devs hurry up with the respec requests? I have no reason to play this game anymore. At least let me spec into something useful that won't get **** on every build/patch so I have some incentive to reinstall Dust and come back.

There's not going to be a new FPS coming out until the PS4. There is a good chance you might be able to get people to try this game again if you can fix stuff first. Why are you listening to people who enjoy the game instead of those who do not? If you're happy with the current number of players that would be reasonable, but if you'd like to get some of those people who deleted this game after downloading it, stuff has to change, and fast.