|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3671
   |
Posted - 2013.05.04 02:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
*sighs* I hate it when someone brings up a good point, but presents it like moron in all caps in the wrong section.
An AV weapon should not be available if a tank of the same meta level isn't also available. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3671
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 02:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:*sighs* I hate it when someone brings up a good point, but presents it like moron in all caps in the wrong section.
An AV weapon should not be available if a tank of the same meta level isn't also available. So should we remove officer weapons till all weapons have one of the same meta level.
I personally don't care if they do it for officer gear, but would make sense actually.
You make a terrible comparison anyway. One anti-infantry weapon vs another anti-infantry weapon is not analogous to AV against tank. AV vs tank is more like offense vs defense, where the offense is designed to destroy the defense; making the lack of meta level symmetry even more of a balance problem. A better analogy would be to compare shield extenders vs scrambler rifles (which does high shield damage).
Would you want prototype scrambler rifles available when only standard shield extenders available. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3671
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 03:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mortedeamor wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:*sighs* I hate it when someone brings up a good point, but presents it like moron in all caps in the wrong section.
An AV weapon should not be available if a tank of the same meta level isn't also available. why post it in feedback and requests ...the number one thing bitched about past few months..redlin sniping . so what does ccp do the give all rail tanks a scope and a zoom fidelity they nurf they hell out of there hp. take away the adv hav for tune up. and force every tanker to snipe. if i go on feedback and ***** about av they are linkely to give yall foot troops some we hav that giant gun that has infinite range and like 3 rounds and does like 4 k dmg...oh wait we have that already hello mr forge gun
There are tons of examples of CCP actually listening to feedback/requests, and you just cherry pick one example of them not listening to justify posting this all caps titled ellipse-ridden misspelled mess here.
You may be interested to know that [CCP]Nothin mentioned in the IRC that they're thinking about removing SP for anything done within the redline, not exactly guarantee but it shows that they do pay attention. Even if they don't listen, posting in the wrong section doesn't change anything. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3671
|
Posted - 2013.05.04 03:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Medic 1879 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:*sighs* I hate it when someone brings up a good point, but presents it like moron in all caps in the wrong section.
An AV weapon should not be available if a tank of the same meta level isn't also available. So should we remove officer weapons till all weapons have one of the same meta level. I personally don't care if they do it for officer gear, but would make sense actually. You make a terrible comparison anyway. One anti-infantry weapon vs another anti-infantry weapon is not analogous to AV against tank. AV vs tank is more like offense vs defense, where the offense is designed to destroy the defense; making the lack of meta level symmetry even more of a balance problem. A better analogy would be to compare shield extenders vs scrambler rifles (which does high shield damage). Would you want prototype scrambler rifles available when only standard shield extenders available. Except the tank can kill an AV unit in less than a second, so that argument falls apart. Besides, I'll be damned if I'm giving up my Boundless REs and Flux nades just because tankers are QQing. And I'm sure Forge heavies aren't going to be willing to give up their protos just because of tanker tears(they're already crying about their "nerf" as it is)
Your fits and stuff costs almost nothing compared to a well built tank, the fact that they can kill you fast is pretty unimportant considering you can keep using up fits with only a fraction of the tank's costs.
If it was the other way around with the addition of proto tanks, and no proto AV, you would be the one here QQing. |
|
|
| |
|