Gotta have a glass vehicle with a giant cannon on top.

Tankers are already cowardly noobs, how much worse could it get?

Oh wait, forgot about tanks being the easy buttons of EVE. Nvm, forget I said anything... Forgive me you awesome king tankers, who can ruin every match I join by bringing in your noob plate of very thick steel.

loltankers, noobs of EVE is more like it. Exmaple had the balls to use an AR tonight, did pretty good too. How about the rest of you tanking turkeys?

Get out of your steel shell and fight like real men, bring in your tanks ONLY to fight other tanks. Using tanks vs infantry is cowards play. And you suck for doing it, period.

LOL FYI, haven't played COD since BO. Try again tank noob (or tank noob affiliate, either way a tanking patsy).

BTW, I am speced into AV proto swarms with prof at lvl 3.

And no matter how you sugar-coat it, somebody bringing in a tank in ambush (with no enemy tankers on field), is a coward POS. You suck and should be ashamed. Bring your gun-game to a FPS first, then whip out your iWin button when you feel inadequate enough to handle the situation

As I let the other clueless person know, I don't play COD, haven't for many years. Must be some general stereotype euros apply to Americans. Sure love the enhanced euro liberal tolerance...LOLOLOLOL!!!

Haha, oh how miss all this. The fact so many disagree and disregard logic, means I am onto something

"Noobs want to keep what is easiest for them, the experienced want what is best for everybody" - leukoplast.

Oh you kiddies.

:') That was beautiful. Did you get my invite to our channel?

Hi all. I've been reading through and we appreciate your feedback.

You're right about the vehicle engineering skill. For the other posters, I'm assuming you mean the vehicle core upgrades skill?

The reason for lowering the overall bonus was to allow us to create a more varied difference in between our different vehicle roles within the same class. This will become more apparent in the future when we release even more roles with different slot layouts. We also want to make sure that new players have a fighting chance against more skill point rich players who can enjoy the benefit of compounding premium module bonuses in the same fitting. We'll be keeping a close eye on how this nets out in vehicle combat, and ensure that we still afford you the ability to create interesting and unique fits to compliment your combat experience.

Best regards,
- CCP Blam!

Was about to bump this myself.

Coming across Pegasis was funny ****, we've encountered each other twice so far, one occasion we just passed each other, aimed at each other sort of like a "Sup" and continued going past, and I do believe my squadmates were quite pissed I continued letting him go loose.

we're nerfed into the ground. Truce is off when tanks stop complaining about being UP.

Hi guys,

Thanks for all your input. Here are some quick points:
- I'm looking at adjusting PG and CPU values, however this is a bit of a big effort so keep that in mind since this will also include re-evaluating PG/CPU costs of all vehicle modules as well and this of course will require an extensive amount of testing.
- we are aware of the issues with turrets. this is going to require some code support and some further feature development to get that out there for you. We're looking at what would be a reasonable deployment plan for you on our end since streaming content (meshes, value changes) is a completely different thing than uploading code changes.
- The Gallente HAVs are intentionally quicker and nimbler than the Caldari HAVs as this is a racial characteristic between the two races. Initially, this was the wrong way around because of an optimization to the physics wheel configuration on these HAVs. Don't forget, at the end of the day that armor tanking is going to reduce the propulsion of an HAV, something which the Gallente HAV is more aligned to.