|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
278
   |
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Coleman Gray wrote:What differnce does it make? we're all in the same boat, the SP costs apply to us all. Now it just means you have to ACTUALLY play to EARN your top tier stuff. People are making the tactical error here in thinking CCP just wants a pure FPS game.
Too many people have become comfy with games like COD where the prospect of having to earn something is beyond people. In comparison to EVE, the game this game was made to support doesn't have active SP, so be happy you even get that.
So it's harder to get your toys, on other FPS games I don't beleive people kick off because they have to wait a bit longer to get their next gun.
But if the idea off earning your gear is too much I'm sure that copy of COD or KZ collecting Dust on your shelf will be happy to take you back.
so you support AFKing and why people AFK and feel like it should actually empower AFKing. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Martin0 Brancaleone wrote:I think it's good that proto stuff is harder to get. Proto suits are the best of the best on the market, it makes sense that you need a good amount of time and specialization to get it. You think that takes time? Start a new eve account and train for a titan. THAT requires time 
eve is not a FPS, when eve becomes a FPS this might hold water to this idea till then its means nothing. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote:ladwar wrote:Martin0 Brancaleone wrote:I think it's good that proto stuff is harder to get. Proto suits are the best of the best on the market, it makes sense that you need a good amount of time and specialization to get it. You think that takes time? Start a new eve account and train for a titan. THAT requires time eve is not a FPS, when eve becomes a FPS this might hold water to this idea till then its means nothing. I actually agree, considering they're both MMOs. I think you're forgetting that.
MMO is a general term meaning there's player interacting with each other and isn't a major mechanic in game play. FPS are totally different then RTS and should never have to the same core mechanic ruling both or else you run into terrible balancing problems like we have now, this SP sink is a band aid to the horrible passive mechanic. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Coleman Gray wrote:ladwar wrote:Coleman Gray wrote:What differnce does it make? we're all in the same boat, the SP costs apply to us all. Now it just means you have to ACTUALLY play to EARN your top tier stuff. People are making the tactical error here in thinking CCP just wants a pure FPS game.
Too many people have become comfy with games like COD where the prospect of having to earn something is beyond people. In comparison to EVE, the game this game was made to support doesn't have active SP, so be happy you even get that.
So it's harder to get your toys, on other FPS games I don't beleive people kick off because they have to wait a bit longer to get their next gun.
But if the idea off earning your gear is too much I'm sure that copy of COD or KZ collecting Dust on your shelf will be happy to take you back. so you support AFKing and why people AFK and feel like it should actually empower AFKing. I'd be up for CCP takin passive SP away and leaving only active, so you only get literally what you earn through play. AFK'ers are kicking over CCP's sandcastle as they build it
but you feel luck that we even get active sp... are you confused or do you just not understand what you said until someone point out how wrong of a statement it really was. which side are you on? |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 07:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
I like watching you flip flop over the issue... you would make a great senator. |
|
|
| |
|