|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1331
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 19:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Hey guys, I'm still recovering from flying for 25 hours (I don't know how Grideris and the other Aussies are still alive) and getting my bearings. I'm pretty much always going to be available through kain_spero on Skype, so feel free to shoot me question an let's have a conversation. I don't have any illusions about knowing everything and it think it's vital for the CPM to consult field experts in regard to everything from specific weapons, suits, and vehicles to types of gameplay. I think the most valuable feedback will always come from the players. You can also send me a mail in game at Kane Spero (although this gets cluttered pretty fast) and email me at [email protected]. I look forward to hearing from you.
What are you going to be a bridge between said experts and CCP decision makers? What steps is CPM taking to ensure they don't become a filter with personal agendas? |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1334
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 20:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Noc Tempre wrote: What are you going to be a bridge between said experts and CCP decision makers? What steps is CPM taking to ensure they don't become a filter with personal agendas? Serving as that bridge starts right here. I've already had a few people reach out to me on Skype as well. Come to me respectfully with your concerns and input and I'll be happy to listen and convey those concerns. If I see things that I will hurt the health of the game in the long run I will do everything in my power to stop it. Non of the meta game or all of the hard work all the us as testers have put into the game matters if Dust fails.
But that is relying on the CPM members being responsibly actors. What checks and balances are you considering? |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1339
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Noc Tempre wrote: But that is relying on the CPM members being responsibly actors. What checks and balances are you considering? I think the Single Transferable Vote system as used in electing CSM 8 is one way to mitigate dead weight candidates. I think the CPM will need to watch how CSM 8 develops and see how STV and merit -based travel impact the quality of the council. in the end I feel that the community and players should have their voices heard and any processes put into place ensure that everyone's vote counts and isn't tossed out on a whim.
You are going to put the entire system of checks and balances on a single annual vote? That strikes me as incredibly naive, at best. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1341
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Noc Tempre wrote: But that is relying on the CPM members being responsibly actors. What checks and balances are you considering? I think the Single Transferable Vote system as used in electing CSM 8 is one way to mitigate dead weight candidates. I think the CPM will need to watch how CSM 8 develops and see how STV and merit -based travel impact the quality of the council. in the end I feel that the community and players should have their voices heard and any processes put into place ensure that everyone's vote counts and isn't tossed out on a whim. You are going to put the entire system of checks and balances on a single annual vote? That strikes me as incredibly naive, at best.
Are you addressing this concern? What rules of conduct will we judge the CPM by if the only accountability is a yearly vote? |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1349
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
How do you feel about CCP monetizing SP instead of the "time, convenience, and cosmetic" only promise?
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71470&find=unread
And don't you dare use the "player trading" excuse because the game is launching this month and even if it is in the next patch, that's 6 more months away. |
|
|
|