DUST Search - The Fate Of This Game For The Next Couple Years Will Be Determined in Just 2 Weeks

Beast Beastlington wrote:

undeadsoldier90 wrote:

Funny thing is im sure most of us closed beta vets could care less if we pub stomp noobs.... I remember when we didnt even have squads...... I remember when every game I played was against the dust elite. I want those days back, I want to fight good people every single game. I want to face imps,pfbhz, not guilty, stb, hellstorm.... I want to have battles that have you sitting on the edge of your chair screaming at your TV.... I want to look at the scoreboard and smile because both teams are stacked and this battle is going to be a good one.

So I say if you dont like dust GTFO.
If you are crying about getting stomped by people who have 11m sp GTFO.
If your crying about the game being to complicated seriously GTFO.

I want that challenge back from closed beta... I want my adrenaline to pump as I shoot it out with good players....

So all you "noob friendly nerf proto" people need to leave. Im sure most of us could care less if all the noobs left and dust was full of vets again.

lol

So lacking in understanding. There is nothing complicated about Dust at all. Nothing more complicated than any other FPS out there right now. It's currently a third rate Battlefield knock off. In fact, Section 8:Prejudice has more complicated core game elements than Dust has. It's a lobby shooter with some ties to an MMO.

Dust has an enormously complicated skill tree system which players either love, or hate. A quick scan around the internet on any gaming forum will show you divisive this feature is.

There's a core of people here who seem to think that Dust belongs to them and only them because they were testing from the beginning. The bizarre logic of GTFO just doesn't wash. Many new people will download the client next month and like most console players, will give it about 1-2 hours of their time to make an impact. If they are continuously getting stomped by people because of a stat advantage and not because of a skill deficit they'll likely abandon it. Less players, less income.

How do you think the press will react to a disparity like this?

I'm sure if CCP don't do something to address the different you'll have those challenging matches with your hardcore buddies, no question. So don't worry, you'll be able to feel fantastic about telling guys like me who might get to play 1-2 hours a week to "GTFO".

I'm certain the future development costs will just pay for themselves. After all, what game needs a thriving playerbase?


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Unclaimed. 809	Posted - 2013.04.28 11:55:00 - [1] - Quote To OP Nerfing stuff for noobs is ridiculous!!!! It's an ONLINE game, there will ALWAYS be new players. There are still new players joining eve, still new player joining WOW, new players joining DCUO, new players still joining bf3. So what you're saying is that stuff should be nerfed every few months to cater for the new players? You don't deserve to be playing this game if that's what you think.
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Unclaimed. 809	Posted - 2013.04.28 12:58:00 - [2] - Quote Wicked Glory wrote: hooc roht wrote: Wicked Glory wrote: Moejoe dropping another logic bomb, only to get ignored by ccp and shitposted at by ccp dickriders. It's been well over a year since the first stages of beta for this game and the changes have been minimal. There's really no hope at this point. Open beta started in January. lets see: January February March April May 14th That is 5 months.... Really less then 4 months as it came out in late January and comes out of beta in mid May but i will give you those two months for calculation purposes. Since when is 5 months "well over a year"? First stages of the beta =/= open beta. This game has been in beta since at least December 2011. Yes it has, CLOSED beta. Are you a closed beta player or open beta? If you're open beta you have no right to complain. If you joined the closed beta then you did that by choice. You whiners complain about dust being in beta over a year, yet you FAIL to take into account that had ccp decided to do INTERNAL beta testing (not all games get a public beta) then it would be the same time frame. Referring to games that don't get public betas, how long do you think developers sit there internally testing their games before release? I guarantee at leaste 6 months to a year. Why do you think gta5 has been pushed back to September? For internal testing. We have been lucky enough that ccp launched a public beta, giving our input and helping towards the development, instead of having a situation that's 'here's the full game, this is what we put in it and this is how we want our game to be....thank you for your $60'
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Unclaimed. 812	Posted - 2013.04.28 22:08:00 - [3] - Quote Beast Beastlington wrote: undeadsoldier90 wrote: Funny thing is im sure most of us closed beta vets could care less if we pub stomp noobs.... I remember when we didnt even have squads...... I remember when every game I played was against the dust elite. I want those days back, I want to fight good people every single game. I want to face imps,pfbhz, not guilty, stb, hellstorm.... I want to have battles that have you sitting on the edge of your chair screaming at your TV.... I want to look at the scoreboard and smile because both teams are stacked and this battle is going to be a good one. So I say if you dont like dust GTFO. If you are crying about getting stomped by people who have 11m sp GTFO. If your crying about the game being to complicated seriously GTFO. I want that challenge back from closed beta... I want my adrenaline to pump as I shoot it out with good players.... So all you "noob friendly nerf proto" people need to leave. Im sure most of us could care less if all the noobs left and dust was full of vets again. lol So lacking in understanding. There is nothing complicated about Dust at all. Nothing more complicated than any other FPS out there right now. It's currently a third rate Battlefield knock off. In fact, Section 8:Prejudice has more complicated core game elements than Dust has. It's a lobby shooter with some ties to an MMO. Dust has an enormously complicated skill tree system which players either love, or hate. A quick scan around the internet on any gaming forum will show you divisive this feature is. There's a core of people here who seem to think that Dust belongs to them and only them because they were testing from the beginning. The bizarre logic of GTFO just doesn't wash. Many new people will download the client next month and like most console players, will give it about 1-2 hours of their time to make an impact. If they are continuously getting stomped by people because of a stat advantage and not because of a skill deficit they'll likely abandon it. Less players, less income. How do you think the press will react to a disparity like this? I'm sure if CCP don't do something to address the different you'll have those challenging matches with your hardcore buddies, no question. So don't worry, you'll be able to feel fantastic about telling guys like me who might get to play 1-2 hours a week to "GTFO". I'm certain the future development costs will just pay for themselves. After all, what game needs a thriving playerbase? 'Battlefield knock off'? If you statement is in reference to to similarities to bf 2142 ......you ARE aware that a % of the team who developed dust are in actual fact EX DICE DEVELOPERS right? I mean, surely you can't be that f***ing thick to now know that. Or if your statement is just purely aimed at the battlefield series altogether, has it not dawned on you that said ex dice employees have created dust in their vision of what battlefield should have been? Dust outshines BF in every sense of the word.