| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
13
   |
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:23:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:I am glad your idea will not work, stop ruining the skirmish matches and creating a larger SP gap.
CCP remove the soft cap already. How would removing the soft cap fix the SP gap? No soft cap means we all have a more reasonable chance of reaching the cap each week without rewarding 24/7 gameplay, which isnt possible without this afk nonsense. What do you think the soft cap is that it would result in hitting the cap each week with greater ease?
If you have no soft cap, you reach the overall cap (which would just be the hard cap) easier, because after reaching the hard cap there would be nowhere to go.
|
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:25:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sergeant Wiznowski wrote:There is simple thing that would reduce AFK - increase SP gains like it was in former weekly SP system.
I don't mind that someone will make weekly cap in one day instead one and half and spend time grinding sp. Good for them. Normal people just can't play in average for 2 hours every day just to get the SP cap. (2 skirmish match per hour / 7K SP per match)
If ever SP rollover will came, AFK will be even bigger thing than now.
I would rather this than the current system. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
745
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
Fellsinner wrote:If you have no soft cap, you reach the overall cap (which would just be the hard cap) easier, because after reaching the hard cap there would be nowhere to go.
Do you think that the removal of the soft cap would result in SP gains increasing or that changing post-cap behaviour would somehow otherwise affect pre-cap gains?
I don't understand why you think the 190k cap would be easier to reach. |
dust badger
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
I think another way to reduce this is by having a multiplier for winning and loosing if you hardly get anything for losing then it wont be as beneficial, this may also reduce the red line sniper tanks that sit in places that are un reachable places (in skirmish )
|
trollsroyce
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
277
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:36:00 -
[35] - Quote
Good idea, I'm in. Probability says overnight you land in half empty, finishing games (especially on Oceania server) so you get the loot. The idea is based on SL activity.
To get even more out of it, squad leaders should make PSN accounts all in Oceania. Then join there from all timezones. This makes the chance of getting quick closing fights very high, and SLs take turns by their timezone for the afk. |
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:If you have no soft cap, you reach the overall cap (which would just be the hard cap) easier, because after reaching the hard cap there would be nowhere to go. Do you think that the removal of the soft cap would result in SP gains increasing or that changing post-cap behaviour would somehow otherwise affect pre-cap gains? I don't understand why you think the 190k cap would be easier to reach.
Really? I didnt say it would be faster or that it changes pre cap gains. All I said was that if you have no soft cap you help combat AFK because everyone can reach the cap easier, whether they afked or not.
Last post on the afk, bored of the responses I feel like a detective at a news conference with dumb reporters |
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:42:00 -
[37] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:
join a corp and we will set up a 1v1 corp battle. I would love for someone to whoop Gunners butt here. Your forum pvp is strong
Ok, I will do that and let you guys know the plan. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
745
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
Fellsinner wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:If you have no soft cap, you reach the overall cap (which would just be the hard cap) easier, because after reaching the hard cap there would be nowhere to go. Do you think that the removal of the soft cap would result in SP gains increasing or that changing post-cap behaviour would somehow otherwise affect pre-cap gains? I don't understand why you think the 190k cap would be easier to reach. if you have no soft cap... everyone can reach the cap easier
The cap is reached equally as easily.
|
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Fellsinner wrote:If you have no soft cap, you reach the overall cap (which would just be the hard cap) easier, because after reaching the hard cap there would be nowhere to go. Do you think that the removal of the soft cap would result in SP gains increasing or that changing post-cap behaviour would somehow otherwise affect pre-cap gains? I don't understand why you think the 190k cap would be easier to reach. if you have no soft cap... everyone can reach the cap easier The cap is reached equally as easily.
With a soft cap, there is no cap. So I hardly see how you reach a hard cap, and a soft cap which never ends, in the same ease. |
Stexn byd
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:46:00 -
[40] - Quote
Fellsinner wrote:Free Beers wrote:
join a corp and we will set up a 1v1 corp battle. I would love for someone to whoop Gunners butt here. Your forum pvp is strong
Ok, I will do that and let you guys know the plan.
now that's bringing the lulz.... |
|
|
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 09:49:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fellsinner wrote:Fellsinner wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:
The cap is reached equally as easily.
With a soft cap, there is no cap. So I hardly see how you reach a hard cap, and have a soft cap which never ends, and reach both with the same ease.
sorry for double post..time for bed |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
745
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
Okay, I get where you're coming from.
Unfortunately everyone would advance at the same pace, then, maintaining the current SP gap... except that a bunch of players would stop playing after the first couple days, which I'm pretty sure CCP doesn't want. |
Fellsinner
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 10:16:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Okay, I get where you're coming from.
Unfortunately everyone would advance at the same pace, then, maintaining the current SP gap... except that a bunch of players would stop playing after the first couple days, which I'm pretty sure CCP doesn't want.
oh, ya the gap itself cant really get smaller from that, just sort of maintain it or keep it from growing. Im sure uprising will keep people around enough.
Sorry I thought you were just trying to bug me lol |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
458
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 11:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:Fellsinner wrote:
I said I was here from EVE Beta, not that I still play it..Sold my character Felsin years ago.
Why dont you just add me to contacts ingame, meet me in a match and then see if you have any more **** to talk.
join a corp and we will set up a 1v1 corp battle. I would love for someone to whoop Gunners butt here. Your forum pvp is strong
Please you barely even put up a fight in our weekly 1v1 duels, what will this lil pup do to me? |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
418
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
Fellsinner wrote:Free Beers wrote:
join a corp and we will set up a 1v1 corp battle. I would love for someone to whoop Gunners butt here. Your forum pvp is strong
Ok, I will do that and let you guys know the plan.
Pro tip: Gunner runs a Mass Driver Logi, get a Laser/SMG combo to rough him up... |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
146
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Bunch of fools, I fear not even bacon would show you how foolish you've been. Thats because its Canadian.
damn Canadians always messing it up! just want some good ole thick sliced bacon dammit!
if when you cook it, it doesn't shrink to about 1/3 its original size, its just isn't acceptable ;) |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |