DUST Search - [Request] Destructible minor environmental assets

Ulysses Knapse wrote:

Eris Ernaga wrote:

KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:

Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion.

Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable.

The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage.

I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now.

Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty.

The stupidity of that statement made me cry... on the inside, of course. I'm too manly to cry on the outside.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3369	Posted - 2013.04.09 03:24:00 - [1] - Quote Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks, boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now.
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 367	Posted - 2013.04.09 03:29:00 - [2] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks, boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. +1 This irks me quite often. However, it should be extended beyond the minor. If I can blow chunks of heavily reinforced armor off a tank, why can that concrete wall stand up to my attacks?
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3405	Posted - 2013.04.13 23:33:00 - [3] - Quote Would be nice
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 231	Posted - 2013.04.13 23:50:00 - [4] - Quote I would like this. However, one day I'm sure that environmental things like boxes and trucks will be removed and replaced with ACTUAL boxes and trucks, with an actual purpose. All is possible with an open-world environment.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:23:00 - [5] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty.
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 237	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:41:00 - [6] - Quote Eris Ernaga wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty. The stupidity of that statement made me cry... on the inside, of course. I'm too manly to cry on the outside.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:42:00 - [7] - Quote Ulysses Knapse wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Being able to destroy a tank, but not some weak civilian truck laying around the map really breaks immersion. Things like roadblocks (including the concrete ones), boxes, those large truck vehicles on the map, it would be nice if all these things could be destroyed. It would really help make the battlefield feel more believable. The civilian vehicles can blow up just like battle vehicles and installations, while other less explosive assets can have 3 versions with various levels of damage that they change between as they take more damage. I would ask for destructible surface infrastructure pieces including the outposts and stuff, but I know that its asking too much for now. Not needed or necessary this isn't battle field 3 if you like the destroyable objects in that game go play it or call of duty. The stupidity of that statement made me cry... on the inside, of course. I'm too manly to cry on the outside. Why because CCP doesn't implement destructible objects? Go play call of duty or battlefield once again if you want destructible objects.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 126	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:43:00 - [8] - Quote Lets be honest here destructible objects serve no purpose besides for a pretty little effect and is a waste of CCP's time.
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 237	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:46:00 - [9] - Quote Eris Ernaga wrote: Lets be honest here destructible objects serve no purpose besides for a pretty little effect and is a waste of CCP's time. I would very much like to clear my path of unneeded obstacles as a Tanker. Wouldn't you?
Jason Pearson Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 812	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:47:00 - [10] - Quote +1 Eris, you're making yourself seem like an idiot. Last time I checked COD didn't have destructible walls and ****, but it's been a while, and forgive us for wanting something that makes BF an amazing game to play (Imo). Also, telling someone like KAGEHOSHI to go play COD is pretty idiotic, considering 99% of his suggestions are brilliant additions to DUST. Actually, they serve a purpose. Destructible Environments allow gameplay to change and previously inaccessible routes become accessible, areas without cover now have cover, that sort of thing. You're a tanker right? when trees and fauna come you're going to wish you could destroy them so you could get through.

slypie11 Planetary Response Organisation 142	Posted - 2013.04.14 02:52:00 - [11] - Quote In addition, this could lead to intense breaching scenarios and a team thinking they are safe only to find enemies pouring in from a hole they blew through the wall. Destructive environments add strategy as well as realism
G Torq ALTA B2O 131	Posted - 2013.04.14 09:25:00 - [12] - Quote +1 to immersion and changing theater
Volgair The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION 270	Posted - 2013.04.14 22:55:00 - [13] - Quote Eris Ernaga wrote: Lets be honest here destructible objects serve no purpose besides for a pretty little effect and is a waste of CCP's time. You sir would be wrong, imagine being on line harvest and forge gunning a leg off of the table top then watching all the LAR guys humorously fall to their deaths at the hands of their former prey below. Or using a Remote explosive to punch a man size hole for a team to breach an inner portion of a structure. A HAV shooting through a Conex Box providing temporary shelter to a forge gunner. Destructible environmental's are hardly a novelty. It would be bad ass if the buildings were destructible but they self repaired over time so Dust would have a mixture of static (buildings/ large structures) and dynamic (Road blocks/ conex boxes) destructible environments. However the production cost of this would be quite high as this is type of map design is not normally done with the unreal engine.
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 886	Posted - 2013.04.14 23:10:00 - [14] - Quote Every Dropship pilot checklist would then follow as so: Destroy the following: Turret Installations Supply Depots Lamp Posts Deploy DS
Jax Thrife L.O.T.I.S. 7	Posted - 2013.04.14 23:28:00 - [15] - Quote would be nice instead of backing into a lamp post and going boom
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3505	Posted - 2013.04.20 08:48:00 - [16] - Quote Jax Thrife wrote: would be nice instead of backing into a lamp post and going boom Agreed
Aythadis Smith The Generals EoN. 2	Posted - 2013.04.20 10:39:00 - [17] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Jax Thrife wrote: would be nice instead of backing into a lamp post and going boom Agreed Oops, damn mail box blew me up again, shucks. (Maybe make these tanks/Lav/rolling caskets from these light posts?)


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page