|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 19:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Is it a pistol? No
Will it probably be more than 200%? Yes Will it be 450%? No, because it's not a pistol.
Pistols = Best headshot weapons = video game logic |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 19:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Is it a pistol? No
Will it probably be more than 200%? Yes Will it be 450%? No, because it's not a pistol.
Pistols = Best headshot weapons = video game logic so now having a super special pistol percentage is ok? In every game I can think of pistols have a higher headshot modifier than your average gun. 450 is the result of those two stacking, maybe 450 is a bit high, idk. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 19:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:theres absolutely no question its too high. a pistol bonus the craziest utter madness.......no other weapon get a bonus simply for being a specific type of gun. Ughh... you mentioned snipers right? They get a 200% bonus. The average bonus is 150%.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 23:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Prius Vecht wrote:pretty sure thats the effect of a railgun round powered by powerful magnets firing into your skull at faster then the speed of sound. has nothing to do with it being a rifle. its called physics.
so now ur about to tell me scramblers pistols do that eh?
Scramblers fry your brain. Thus the headshot bonus. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 23:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kushmir Nadian wrote:why would it need anything higher than the 150% headshot we see already? Do I really need a reason other than "that's what CCP wants"? Obviously they didn't just pull the number out their ass, it's pretty clear they want SP headshots to 1HKOs
Just like they decided to gimp HMGs in the name of "balance"data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b56/50b56096c194f7139d5172dbae6cc60966b382c6" alt="Roll" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
767
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.06 23:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
This thread is just full of butthurt snipers who are mad that they don't have the best headshot bonus in the game.
Well my HMG has less range than an AR, so you guys can suck it too. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3673/f3673f30d15d6f49b6419b07145a69ea5c55b0d0" alt="Sloth9230 Sloth9230"
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
771
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2013.04.07 04:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kushmir Nadian wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Kushmir Nadian wrote:why would it need anything higher than the 150% headshot we see already? Do I really need a reason other than "that's what CCP wants"? Obviously they didn't just pull the number out their ass, it's pretty clear they want SP headshots to 1HKOs Just like they decided to gimp HMGs in the name of "balance" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b56/50b56096c194f7139d5172dbae6cc60966b382c6" alt="Roll" Ahhh...BAD EXAMPLE. CCP not infallible if you haven't noticed. Do you remember the early swarm launchers? missiles? repair farming? full auto tacticals? did they want that too? And how many would be playing this game with horrible gameplay like that? NOT MANY. They need testers to tell them..."this is horrible and inconsistent, rethink this." HMGs are fine. I use one about 60% of the time...Its a weapon with a bit too much range if you ask me. There's a difference between changing something because it's actually broken, and changing something because enough people complained. The skill/luck required in landing a headshot is what makes it okay, at least in my book. |
|
|
|