|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2200
   |
Posted - 2013.03.29 15:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Nice to know I'm still running under the radar... |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2200
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 15:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote:Given that "Extremely Dangerous" seems to be defined as having a high KDR and low SP, so much so that a character with one of the highest WP ratings is only "Moderately Dangerous"...
Either CONCORD is smoking that Booster that Roden is freaking out about, or this is just bad intel.
I do have to question though... we only have numbers on total WP, not WP/death or WP/minute or WP/battle or anything that makes WP a measure of anything more than time spent in-game.
Some high-WP players aren't really all that dangerous when you look at how they got those high WP counts.
If I average 500 WP per Skirmish match, and another guy averages 1000 WP per Ambush, fighting for less time and with less hack opportunities and doubling my WP count, but I play for 8 hours a day and he only spends 1 hour in the game, I'm going to very quickly end up with a MASSSIVE lead in WP count.
We need more information than this "monitoring" can provide in its current form if we really want to judge who's "dangerous". |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2200
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 16:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alina Heart wrote:Quite disappointed with the "intel" all of this information is already public to everybody via the leaderboards. Just another highlight of Concord failing at doing something even somewhat relevant or meaningful yet again. If Concord knew what they were doing they would have a full panorama of Intel dedicated to only me.
Well whatever, the longer I go unnoticed the easier it is for me to secure my rightful place as the new God of new Eden.
I'd vote for you.
...
...maybe. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2209
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
The Medic Droid wrote:*Stares at the ground dejectedly*
My corporation isn't on any of the lists.
Neither are any of the Corps I run with, some of which are going to give a rude awakening to anyone trusting this information.
Be thankful that you've stayed out of their spotlight. You're not alone in doing so. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2228
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 10:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tenchu-13 wrote:Ok who snitched on our activities FFS.
I thought we wanted to appear as a peaceful corp, only drinking wine, eating baguettes and a Dust-cart race every now and then. Damn you spies 'de merde' :)
You still have "French" in your name.
That means a lot of people will assume you're going to surrender, because obviously, the French have never had experience fighting without surrender before.  |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2232
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 11:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tenchu-13 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:
That means a lot of people will assume you're going to surrender, because obviously, the French have never had experience fighting without surrender before.
'Ouch' touch+¬, though I could have seen that one coming from miles away :) But tbh I'm not french... I'm just a dutch person who infiltrated the french because he likes eating baguettes and drinking wine.
In case you couldn't tell, the eyeroll at the end was indicating that I was being sarcastic.
It's a predictable stereotype with very little basis in fact and no modern corroboration. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2300
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 01:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
Laheon wrote: Can't wait to see you try and shoot down a frigate with your AR.
Who'd ues an AR agaisnt a Frigate?
Everyone knows that's what Plasma Cannons are for. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2303
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 04:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:low genius wrote:concord cheats, and that's all there is to it. they're not to be trusted in any way.
i start sweating every time i see some stupid white cross in my space. who/what is concord? (I have never played eve)
CONCORD is basically EVE's NPC police force. They're the reason HighSec is HighSec. |
|
|
| |
|