DUST Search - Unreal vs. PFBHz tonight at 10 PM EDT

Kreayshawn Coruscanti wrote:

Sontie wrote:

Jaiden Longshot wrote:

The replies to Sontie were because his assumption that we rely on gun game rather than tactics is silly. You don't win 95% of your matches (some against the better corps in beta) on gun game alone. You also can't watch one player without hearing comms and then know everything that went into the battle from a tactical or communication standpoint.

I wasn't trying to suggest that you didn't use tactics or that you relied solely on gun game. I was suggesting that while you guys have excellent gun game, your tactics could use work. And I wasn't suggesting that the tactics you did use were poor. The won and won well. It was more how individual players would assault enemy positions without support. Maybe I should have mentioned that. Does this explain the reaction? You thought I was criticizing your battlefield commander? I wasn't.

And what I wouldn't pay to hear those comms.

Also, Xeno. Eat a Mass Driver.

Yes that's great and all, but everyone (especially us) can see all the flaws in the video. It's a lot easier in hindsight. I can see a lot of cleaning up that can be done midmatch and after the match. That being said, I think individuals win games in these small 8v8s. If you have one guy ground commanding, you can't micromanage people the way it needs to be done to be effective in 8v8s. You need individuals who know what they need to do, can do it without being explicitly told, and can do it well. I'm not entirely sure what individual players and when you were talking about in the video, but the assaulting enemy positions alone part I can't agree as being one of the main flaws. Our main flaw being, the win should have been more faaabulous than it was.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 755	Posted - 2013.03.28 23:36:00 - [1] - Quote DarkPrometheus wrote: My money is this is going to be a epic battle. ISK says Unreal has "something" come up and "reschedule". That little voice in the back of your head Unreal... its called failure. I can hear the fear pumping through their hearts right now.
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 757	Posted - 2013.03.29 04:52:00 - [2] - Quote XeroTheBigBoss wrote: UNREAL #3 Idk... I think Hellstorm might have something to say about that.
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 762	Posted - 2013.03.29 18:03:00 - [3] - Quote NIKIA BETHUNE wrote: Damn from reading and listening I'm surprised pfbhz are not in negative feedback they are just as big of dicks. Just reading how much of an ******* these guys are... Wow I use to respect them they are just imperfects under another name anyone can see this. Thanks Nikia! So you don't respect us huh... You know just how to wound a fella.
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 763	Posted - 2013.03.30 00:54:00 - [4] - Quote Kreayshawn Coruscanti wrote: Sontie wrote: Jaiden Longshot wrote: The replies to Sontie were because his assumption that we rely on gun game rather than tactics is silly. You don't win 95% of your matches (some against the better corps in beta) on gun game alone. You also can't watch one player without hearing comms and then know everything that went into the battle from a tactical or communication standpoint. I wasn't trying to suggest that you didn't use tactics or that you relied solely on gun game. I was suggesting that while you guys have excellent gun game, your tactics could use work. And I wasn't suggesting that the tactics you did use were poor. The won and won well. It was more how individual players would assault enemy positions without support. Maybe I should have mentioned that. Does this explain the reaction? You thought I was criticizing your battlefield commander? I wasn't. And what I wouldn't pay to hear those comms. Also, Xeno. Eat a Mass Driver. Yes that's great and all, but everyone (especially us) can see all the flaws in the video. It's a lot easier in hindsight. I can see a lot of cleaning up that can be done midmatch and after the match. That being said, I think individuals win games in these small 8v8s. If you have one guy ground commanding, you can't micromanage people the way it needs to be done to be effective in 8v8s. You need individuals who know what they need to do, can do it without being explicitly told, and can do it well. I'm not entirely sure what individual players and when you were talking about in the video, but the assaulting enemy positions alone part I can't agree as being one of the main flaws. Our main flaw being, the win should have been more faaabulous than it was. They took positions and held them. It was a cohesive effort. You can see each person responding to what they need to do. We didn't have audio, but i'm sure when 4 reds pop up on screen rushing C, it doesn't take alot of call out to have reinforcements come help. They took B&C and held it the way they needed to, everyone did their job. Sontie, were you guys going to post up your next Corp. Battle so we can see the teamwork?