|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
   |
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:What about a system where each individual player can submit a report to their contractor for that match. Every report against a player would require them to get 50 WP or they don't get payed. So, assuming a squad of 4 AFKs and 12 other players, that would require each of them to earn 600 WP or they don't payed during that match.
Reporting someone would be as easy as going to the scoreboard and selecting them like if you wanted to check their info or add them to your contacts.
*i put on my wizard robe and hat.
*i throw a nano hive and droplink inside the MCC scoring 250 |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Rifter7 wrote:so.. lets say i don't like this sloth guy because i hear hes one of those dark souls kids and me and my squad decide to report you afk at the very end of the round..
yeah.. there goes your isk. 200 WP? In a match? That's easy. The WP requirements would be for the entire match, not just after I'm reported. But who could ever hate me?  Buster Friently wrote:Kinda complex. Converting Dust to all passive SP would be simpler and more effective. I dislike that because then I have no incentive to actually play, I would just put it on passive and come back in a month/year.
kinda like now
|
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Well almost any system I could think of could be exploited or abused, so yeah, Idk what the hell CCP could possibly do to fix this.
easy..
1sp per second, 5sp per warpoint.
fixed.
their experimental system has fail all over it, trying to morally bind players to some unwritten code of ethics and a few players supporting this with their so called boycotting of the AFKers has totally failed on so many levels. |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 16:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sloth9230 wrote:Buster Friently wrote:
This is why going all passive is better. New players would earn sp on an equal footing with veterans, and afking would be eliminated.
It would also remove any satisfaction from personally training my skills. Why play Dust when I can play Pokemon for year and then comeback to find a nice pool of SP? Why play Dust at all? It might work for EVE, but Dust isn't EVE.
he's an eve player bro he just doesn't gat it |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 22:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
sharted pantaloon wrote:Baal Omniscient wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Buster Friently wrote:
This is why going all passive is better. New players would earn sp on an equal footing with veterans, and afking would be eliminated.
It would also remove any satisfaction from personally training my skills. Why play Dust when I can play Pokemon for year and then comeback to find a nice pool of SP? Why play Dust at all? It might work for EVE, but Dust isn't EVE. Theoretically, you should be playing dust because it is fun. Extrinsic lures are a form of psychological addiction. If dust isn't fun to play, sp aside, you should move on. That is the same logic AFK farmers are using. Except they are still doing it so that when/if Dust ever meets their standards, they can jump in with a SP pool close to what it would be if they had never left. OH, WAIT! That's exactly what would happen if it WAS all passive SP! No to removing active SP. So, explain to me how going all passive hurts the rest of the community. It would let those that don't find the game entertaining but are still hopeful for the next build go elsewhere and bank SP. They'd quit clogging up our uberserious pubmatches with their darn farming, so only the tryhards and the newbies would be in match. The joke will be on them when they come back with their pool of 5 million SP and realize those that were playing 23.5/7 while they were gone got a little bit better from all the practicing. Edited to repair the longest runon sentence I've ever seen.
see the problem is, the game being on console, it requires it to be sold to console FPS players, no console FPS player is going to go for PC style passive SP. console FPS players require reward for their actions in game. It's juvenile, yes, it's stupid yes, but it is what it is- console FPS players require reward for their actions in game, and if the game is going to thrive on console then passive sp is not appealing to the console gamer.
seriously i know we all bag on cod players but the fact is they are our future audience if dust wants to stay afloat, it needs the population. u dont go to school or work and here about people raving about dust514 it's all COD and maybe an occasional battlefield 3er.. if we ever hope to convert these people it's embarassing to say to them "oh yea dust is so awesome, you get all passive sp and none for in game actions" yea like any normal console gamer is going to be sold on that note.. |
Sobriety Denied
FIREFLY ATLANTIS ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
TACNET
509
|
Posted - 2013.03.26 22:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
i was affronted for going 9/1 in a game and then when i went 0/0 the next game i earned more SP than i did for 9/1, they actually gave me a 2k sp bonus when i AFKed..??? |
|
|
| |
|