| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Galen Gaia
DUST University
Ivy League
48
   |
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
What is the point of splash damage on swarm homing missiles? That would be useful if you could "dumb" fire the missiles, but you can't. |
Mr Pwnykins
Arrogance.
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
To get my splashy mess all over those Imperfect baddies surrounding their tanks. |
DJINN Marauder
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
373
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
They use to be dumb fire hence that's why there was splash dmg. CCP removed dumb fire but forgot to remove splash dmg stat |
Necrodermis
GunFall Mobilization
Covert Intervention
472
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
to make it seem like when you level it up it makes it feel like it does something good when it doesn't do anything at all |
XANDER KAG
Crimson Wings Brigade
38
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 21:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
I almost wish they would remove mandatory lock-ons. Doesn't make much sense why you have to lock onto the tank 10m from you. Meanwhile he sees you and kills you. But then there would be a crap load of player just running around with swarms shooting at people's feet. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Has anybody ever tested if that "splash damage" is now a blast radius sort of thing and they never changed the text for it? I know in EVE blast radius means a lot when talking about missiles. A bigger blast radius equates to more damage to a target in motion. If it did change to blast radius that could be a factor in why higher tier swarms are better than a nonskilled militia swarm. I have no idea if theres truth to this though, its only theory. |
Skipper Jones
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
In the weapons video a while ago they said they were making a dumb fire rocket launcher. The plasma launcher I think but I'm not sure. |
Lasarte Ioni
Noob Gaming
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
XANDER KAG wrote:I almost wish they would remove mandatory lock-ons. Doesn't make much sense why you have to lock onto the tank 10m from you. Meanwhile he sees you and kills you. But then there would be a crap load of players just running around with swarms shooting at people's feet.
There was a time when ppl did that, so they nerfed the SL dmg against infantry to a point where you could take a volley to the head and lose less than half your shield, but ppl kept complaining and they removed the dumb fire, making CQC AV a "risky" business. (Ok, you can nade spam da tanks, but it's not the same) |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
896
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:In the weapons video a while ago they said they were making a dumb fire rocket launcher. The plasma launcher I think but I'm not sure.
Plasma Canon https://dust514.com/media/wallpapers/testers-tournament-unlock-5-5/ |
Skipper Jones
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 22:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:
So close, got the plasma part right.
|
|
|
Philipp Achtel
Immobile Infantry
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 23:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lasarte Ioni wrote:There was a time when ppl did that, so they nerfed the SL dmg against infantry to a point where you could take a volley to the head and lose less than half your shield, but ppl kept complaining and they removed the dumb fire, making CQC AV a "risky" business. (Ok, you can nade spam da tanks, but it's not the same)
People on these forums appeal for game rule changes way too much, and unfortunately CCP just rewards their behavior. |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
940
|
Posted - 2013.03.22 00:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
DJINN Marauder wrote:They use to be dumb fire hence that's why there was splash dmg. CCP removed dumb fire but forgot to remove splash dmg stat
dmb fire is still in, people are just dense |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |