|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
302
   |
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Man Dust is exciting lately - Planetary Conquest and now War Council! O boy o boy, I get so buzzed when things really start happening! |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
305
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:
Well good luck with it then
Expect a backlash if the wrong ppl get picked tho
There'll always be some people unhappy with some of the choices - some simply because they weren't picked and others because their friends weren't picked and others again if their enemies are picked. You can't please everybody. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
306
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:How will we know who is on it? How could we put in a recommendation to be picked?
CCP devs and GMs have already made their nominations to CCP Nolan. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
306
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
PT SD wrote:Vaerana Myshtana wrote:Parson Atreides wrote:Congratulations Iron Wolf Saber. I had the same thought.  Nope, I vote for Cerebral Wolf or dent308. The rest of these people were doing this first with questionable motives. I really don't trust anybody else, and you shouldn't either. Remember, these people tried to do this themselves to get free trips to Iceland.
Fortunately it's not a community vote because we'd soon see the leaders of the big corps and the mouthiest forum posters take up all the positions if it was! |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
311
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 11:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think people need to stop getting so riled up about who gets picked and how voting might work.
CCP have hand selected their candidates who have been vetted and will then be interviewed - trust that CCP will pick non-trolls/relatively impartial/sensible and moderate players instead of the lying cheating scumbags some seem to envisage will somehow get in.
On the voting side of things, chances are there won't be any community voting at all, ever. It certainly won't be on a per player/account/MAC address basis. How about we just stop debating this entirely and let CCP and whoever's picked for WC figure out how they think things should be done, instead of senselessly arguing amongst ourselves. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
313
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 12:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sir Meode wrote:I am uneasy with CCP picking the people to represent the player base. Whats to stop them picking people who have agrred with everything they have done and just using them as puppets?
Having CCP pick the war council may look good on paper but its a bad idea.
Why would CCP want player representatives for a council to help critique they're ideas if all they did was say everything's great? That makes no sense and serves no purpose. How would they be used as puppets? They have no actual power; they're just advisors.
The War Council is like a smaller, condensed and more helpful version of the forums - CCP can use them to help analyse plans or get ideas or some well thought through community feedback. Just look at the feedback/requests sections of the forums to see how CCP wan't sensible critique and not just to be agreed with on everything. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
318
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 15:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote:CCP Eterne wrote:
Luckily, we already have access to the posting history of all our internal candidates. We have vetted a number of candidates that were suggested to us and we have reviewed their forum posting history along with a number of other qualifications in order to be sure they live up to the standards we are setting for the beta War Council.
In other words, if any of your posts ever contained "HTFU", "scrub", "newberry", or "QQ", you are not WC material. 
I imagine what they meant was that they checked through for people trolling or breaking the forum rules rather than using really quite common terminology. |
|
|
| |
|