Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
BLENDEDDAVE
WARRIORS 1NC
55
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 15:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
planetary response playing as good as ever gg fellas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGCyQ8oi-5U&feature=youtu.be |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 15:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Silly barbarian warrior, you don't use smartphone cameras to record TV's! Silly warrior.
Now seriously: Good job, do you want a cookie? |
IRuby Heart
DIOS EX.
422
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 15:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
I have to commend you for recording with whatever it is you're recording with. The quality was a little lower than a OVR of course but I enjoyed and had no issues watching it.
Now though, I don't know if your just trolling PRO or you really meant GG's, but c'mon that's a low blow. |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 15:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
IRuby Heart wrote:I have to commend you for recording with whatever it is you're recording with. The quality was a little lower than a OVR of course but I enjoyed and had no issues watching it. Now though, I don't know if your just trolling PRO or you really meant GG's, but c'mon that's a low blow. Oh and Lisa Michelle really needs to get sponsored as DUST 514 model, "Fat has never looked this beautiful!" To be honest, considering PRO is a corp that accepts everyone with a gun, its easier to run into the bad players. I looked at the list of players they played against, I haven't recognized a single one that was in the "good players" list in my mind. Recording a match playing against the worst/average of PRO doesn't say anything.
And the fact that he needs to strike low blows like these to make himself feel better shows how low his confidence is. Enjoy this win Warrior. |
BLENDEDDAVE
WARRIORS 1NC
58
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:IRuby Heart wrote:I have to commend you for recording with whatever it is you're recording with. The quality was a little lower than a OVR of course but I enjoyed and had no issues watching it. Now though, I don't know if your just trolling PRO or you really meant GG's, but c'mon that's a low blow. Oh and Lisa Michelle really needs to get sponsored as DUST 514 model, "Fat has never looked this beautiful!" To be honest, considering PRO is a corp that accepts everyone with a gun, its easier to run into the bad players. I looked at the list of players they played against, I haven't recognized a single one that was in the "good players" list in my mind. Recording a match playing against the worst/average of PRO doesn't say anything. And the fact that he needs to strike low blows like these to make himself feel better shows how low his confidence is about his corp. Enjoy this win Warrior.
you mad bro? ps say hello to jow for me will you and now more spam for a week RE are agreement |
|
GM Vegas
Game Masters C C P Alliance
399
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Moving this to the locker room. |
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
BLENDEDDAVE wrote:Cat Merc wrote:IRuby Heart wrote:I have to commend you for recording with whatever it is you're recording with. The quality was a little lower than a OVR of course but I enjoyed and had no issues watching it. Now though, I don't know if your just trolling PRO or you really meant GG's, but c'mon that's a low blow. Oh and Lisa Michelle really needs to get sponsored as DUST 514 model, "Fat has never looked this beautiful!" To be honest, considering PRO is a corp that accepts everyone with a gun, its easier to run into the bad players. I looked at the list of players they played against, I haven't recognized a single one that was in the "good players" list in my mind. Recording a match playing against the worst/average of PRO doesn't say anything. And the fact that he needs to strike low blows like these to make himself feel better shows how low his confidence is about his corp. Enjoy this win Warrior. you mad bro? ps say hello to jow for me will you and now more spam for a week RE are agreement Whatever floats your boat bro. Act like a Warrior instead of a sissy and respect your enemy. |
BLENDEDDAVE
WARRIORS 1NC
60
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:BLENDEDDAVE wrote:Cat Merc wrote:IRuby Heart wrote:I have to commend you for recording with whatever it is you're recording with. The quality was a little lower than a OVR of course but I enjoyed and had no issues watching it. Now though, I don't know if your just trolling PRO or you really meant GG's, but c'mon that's a low blow. Oh and Lisa Michelle really needs to get sponsored as DUST 514 model, "Fat has never looked this beautiful!" To be honest, considering PRO is a corp that accepts everyone with a gun, its easier to run into the bad players. I looked at the list of players they played against, I haven't recognized a single one that was in the "good players" list in my mind. Recording a match playing against the worst/average of PRO doesn't say anything. And the fact that he needs to strike low blows like these to make himself feel better shows how low his confidence is about his corp. Enjoy this win Warrior. you mad bro? ps say hello to jow for me will you and now more spam for a week RE are agreement Whatever floats your boat bro. Act like a Warrior instead of a sissy and respect your enemy. Only then will you be worthy of your name.
hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
62
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
BLENDEDDAVE wrote: hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying. |
BLENDEDDAVE
WARRIORS 1NC
60
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
no |
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
66
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 16:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
BLENDEDDAVE wrote:no I could do the same: Yes |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 04:32:00 -
[12] - Quote
a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
88
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. Should I remind you that these people were the newbies of the corp? It was like taking candy from a baby. With a gun. |
Kitten Commander
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:BLENDEDDAVE wrote: hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying.
I have to commend you. This is the first time that I have actually seen someone from PRO (other than MT) provide some honesty. There are definitely some good players within but they are overshadowed by the all-mighty ZERGness that is the corp as a whole.
There might be gold in that mountain of poo but everyone is just going to see the mountain.
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
99
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:BLENDEDDAVE wrote: hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying. I have to commend you. This is the first time that I have actually seen someone from PRO (other than MT) provide some honesty. There are definitely some good players within but they are overshadowed by the all-mighty ZERGness that is the corp as a whole. There might be gold in that mountain of poo but everyone is just going to see the mountain. Well, I saw plenty of others say that. But they are ignored. Always ignored. |
Kitten Commander
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:BLENDEDDAVE wrote: hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying. I have to commend you. This is the first time that I have actually seen someone from PRO (other than MT) provide some honesty. There are definitely some good players within but they are overshadowed by the all-mighty ZERGness that is the corp as a whole. There might be gold in that mountain of poo but everyone is just going to see the mountain. Well, I saw plenty of others say that. But they are ignored. Always ignored.
TBH, I havent. Usually, I just get the same ol same ol when it comes to the corp PR wagon of training the 'MERCs of tomorrow!"
Typical scenario: You see a squad of PRO on your side, you instantly cringe. At the end of the game, there might be one that puts up some decent numbers (even in the top 3). The rest of them are 2/4 with around 300 WP.
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
104
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:BLENDEDDAVE wrote: hey man you the one back peddling . oh nice to know your corps full of scrubs by the way you said it m8 . comeing on here and making excuses for your No1 corps losses funny bro
Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying. I have to commend you. This is the first time that I have actually seen someone from PRO (other than MT) provide some honesty. There are definitely some good players within but they are overshadowed by the all-mighty ZERGness that is the corp as a whole. There might be gold in that mountain of poo but everyone is just going to see the mountain. Well, I saw plenty of others say that. But they are ignored. Always ignored. TBH, I havent. Usually, I just get the same ol same ol when it comes to the corp PR wagon of training the 'MERCs of tomorrow!" Typical scenario: You see a squad of PRO on your side, you instantly cringe. At the end of the game, there might be one that puts up some decent numbers (even in the top 3). The rest of them are 2/4 with around 300 WP. Well, I'm usually in the top 3, and my squad is too. Even with the people that bash us on the other side. |
Kitten Commander
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote: Yes, I said we have a lot of scrubs. But I didn't say we lack good players. We are the biggest corp in the game, that means you have to sift through a lot of noise to find the good people. In fact, we might have more good players than your corp. BTW, would you kindly work on your English, my brain feels like its going to shut down reading what you're saying.
I have to commend you. This is the first time that I have actually seen someone from PRO (other than MT) provide some honesty. There are definitely some good players within but they are overshadowed by the all-mighty ZERGness that is the corp as a whole. There might be gold in that mountain of poo but everyone is just going to see the mountain. Well, I saw plenty of others say that. But they are ignored. Always ignored. TBH, I havent. Usually, I just get the same ol same ol when it comes to the corp PR wagon of training the 'MERCs of tomorrow!" Typical scenario: You see a squad of PRO on your side, you instantly cringe. At the end of the game, there might be one that puts up some decent numbers (even in the top 3). The rest of them are 2/4 with around 300 WP. Well, I'm usually in the top 3, and my squad is too. Even with the people that bash us on the other side.
4 > 3, Math has failed you. Sorry, you left that one wide open.
Besides, if you run in a squad of good PRO, then you account for a small percentage of the entire corp. Lets say you had 50 good to very good players in the corp. That would still be a 1 in 20 chance of running into them when you see PRO which would make it an anomaly.
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
106
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:03:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kitten Commander wrote: 4 > 3, Math has failed you. Sorry, you left that one wide open.
Besides, if you run in a squad of good PRO, then you account for a small percentage of the entire corp. Lets say you had 50 good to very good players in the corp. That would still be a 1 in 20 chance of running into them when you see PRO which would make it an anomaly.
I meant that if I have a squad we fill up all 4 places on the top. I thought you would figure it out by yourself -_-
I noticed that even the worst players get a decent score with good leadership. So I try to either get a good leader for the squad or be a leader myself and do my best to help the new berries. We are trying to help the new guys turn to great players, and that isn't going to happen without them going into the battlefield with us helping. |
Kitten Commander
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote: 4 > 3, Math has failed you. Sorry, you left that one wide open.
Besides, if you run in a squad of good PRO, then you account for a small percentage of the entire corp. Lets say you had 50 good to very good players in the corp. That would still be a 1 in 20 chance of running into them when you see PRO which would make it an anomaly.
I meant that if I have a squad we fill up all 4 places on the top. I thought you would figure it out by yourself -_- I noticed that even the worst players get a decent score with good leadership. So I try to either get a good leader for the squad or be a leader myself and do my best to help the new berries. We are trying to help the new guys turn to great players, and that isn't going to happen without them going into the battlefield with us helping.
Now you are venturing back to corp PR. |
|
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
114
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kitten Commander wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Kitten Commander wrote: 4 > 3, Math has failed you. Sorry, you left that one wide open.
Besides, if you run in a squad of good PRO, then you account for a small percentage of the entire corp. Lets say you had 50 good to very good players in the corp. That would still be a 1 in 20 chance of running into them when you see PRO which would make it an anomaly.
I meant that if I have a squad we fill up all 4 places on the top. I thought you would figure it out by yourself -_- I noticed that even the worst players get a decent score with good leadership. So I try to either get a good leader for the squad or be a leader myself and do my best to help the new berries. We are trying to help the new guys turn to great players, and that isn't going to happen without them going into the battlefield with us helping. Now you are venturing back to corp PR. I'm just saying what I noticed from personal experience. If I see a problem I will point it out, if I see something good I will also point it out, no matter the corp. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 07:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. Should I remind you that these people were the newbies of the corp? It was like taking candy from a baby. With a gun.
Your entire corp is newbies. The good ones are, what I think I've heard... 3 names? out of a supposed 1000-1600.
that means the maximum good players in your corp are .3 percent trickling down to .1875 percent of your population that means that there is a less than 1% chance of running into ANY good players from your corp. hell, those three aren't even a full squad. |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
116
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 11:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. Should I remind you that these people were the newbies of the corp? It was like taking candy from a baby. With a gun. Your entire corp is newbies. The good ones are, what I think I've heard... 3 names? out of a supposed 1000-1600. that means the maximum good players in your corp are .3 percent trickling down to .1875 percent of your population that means that there is a less than 1% chance of running into ANY good players from your corp. hell, those three aren't even a full squad. That's an assumption that has no basis. I could give you 8 players off the top of my head. If you ask nicely |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 15:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. Should I remind you that these people were the newbies of the corp? It was like taking candy from a baby. With a gun. Your entire corp is newbies. The good ones are, what I think I've heard... 3 names? out of a supposed 1000-1600. that means the maximum good players in your corp are .3 percent trickling down to .1875 percent of your population that means that there is a less than 1% chance of running into ANY good players from your corp. hell, those three aren't even a full squad. That's an assumption that has no basis. I could give you 8 players off the top of my head. If you ask nicely
Still less than 1% even at the minimum quoted number of players in your corp. Quality, not quantity my friend. |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
125
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 16:05:00 -
[25] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:a foe has to be worthy of respect, it is something earned from a hard fought victory, their mcc barely even had its shields down, and they lost fewer than 20 clones in the fighting. that was not hard fought. Should I remind you that these people were the newbies of the corp? It was like taking candy from a baby. With a gun. Your entire corp is newbies. The good ones are, what I think I've heard... 3 names? out of a supposed 1000-1600. that means the maximum good players in your corp are .3 percent trickling down to .1875 percent of your population that means that there is a less than 1% chance of running into ANY good players from your corp. hell, those three aren't even a full squad. That's an assumption that has no basis. I could give you 8 players off the top of my head. If you ask nicely Still less than 1% even at the minimum quoted number of players in your corp. Quality, not quantity my friend. First of all, I said off the top of my head, if I ask around in the corp chat I will get more. (In fact I KNOW we have more, I just forgot their names) Secondly, I could say your corp (Even though I'm pretty sure that's an NPC corp) has zero good players and what I said would be just as valid as what you said. It isn't. You can't know and I can't know. Instead of being a forum warrior, fight against our corp and ask for the better players. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 19:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
So you're falling back on the religious debate point now(you can't prove god exists, but you also can't conclusively prove he/she/it doesn't exist either) Is PRO just a cult then? |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
128
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 21:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:So you're falling back on the religious debate point now(you can't prove god exists, but you also can't conclusively prove he/she/it doesn't exist either) Is PRO just a cult then? So you're falling back on making me lol? I can prove, if you come to a corp match and ask for the good players. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 23:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:So you're falling back on the religious debate point now(you can't prove god exists, but you also can't conclusively prove he/she/it doesn't exist either) Is PRO just a cult then? So you're falling back on making me lol? I can prove, if you come to a corp match and ask for the good players.
And that's the difference, other corps don't need to call out their good players from the newbie masses, they recruited well and therefore have good players. you'll take anything that can figure out how to use the instant battle. |
Cat Merc
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
133
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 23:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:So you're falling back on the religious debate point now(you can't prove god exists, but you also can't conclusively prove he/she/it doesn't exist either) Is PRO just a cult then? So you're falling back on making me lol? I can prove, if you come to a corp match and ask for the good players. And that's the difference, other corps don't need to call out their good players from the newbie masses, they recruited well and therefore have good players. you'll take anything that can figure out how to use the instant battle. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. You are focusing on the disadvantages, but you're forgetting that since we're so big, we can win battles by just attrition even if our players suck. (I'm going into Planetary Conquest here, since corp matches are pointless really) So we send the good players where we need some place taken quick, and the rest will work on low priority planets. Plus we get a bunch of them to PvE, and considering corp taxes, we keep our operations afloat. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 23:46:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Cat Merc wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:So you're falling back on the religious debate point now(you can't prove god exists, but you also can't conclusively prove he/she/it doesn't exist either) Is PRO just a cult then? So you're falling back on making me lol? I can prove, if you come to a corp match and ask for the good players. And that's the difference, other corps don't need to call out their good players from the newbie masses, they recruited well and therefore have good players. you'll take anything that can figure out how to use the instant battle. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. You are focusing on the disadvantages, but you're forgetting that since we're so big, we can win battles by just attrition even if our players suck. So we send the good players where we need some place taken quick, and the rest will work on low priority planets. Plus we get a bunch of them to PvE, and considering corp taxes, we keep our operations afloat.
Attrition implies the other side will have enough losses for you to have the advantage. from my experience, you'll run out of cash LOOONG before you can even make a dent in any respectable corp's districts. every failure is another 20 million down the drain for you. they'll lose 5 clones, restock them by the next time you're allowed to attack, you'll lose another 20 mil.
Though you can attack multiple battlefields, you can only field 16 to any one field. any resistance at all and your newbies will falter, and any hard resistance and your best will hit a brick wall.
I judge your skill by your average player. your average players tend to perform worse than blueberries. I could care less that you have a squad or two of good players. Other corps have 5-6 that will match your best in gear, skill, and (judging by your zerg-esque mindset) their tactics will be exponentially better than yours. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |